To clarify what I meant, "bread and circus" is shorthand for stuff provided by the state for free at point of delivery. I think the implications are the same here as when the phrase was coined:Capitalism with low bread and low circus(shorthand for **** people want) is just despotism(or I suppose war or famine). But let's resurrect the demons of the 20th to fight the nightmares.
That definition sounds designed to posit more regulated forms of market economy as not capitalist.
don't make me tap the sign.
Spoiler :
![]()
The instruction to the toddler to put the veggies in a pot rather than the latrine is presumably one part of a broader lesson in how to prepare veggies, rather than an exercise of arbitrary authority. If the toddler did not come to adulthood understanding why the veggies go in the pot rather than the latrine, then the community has salvaged some vegetables at the cost of a functioning member; not a great trade, you'll agree.So when a little hunter gatherer toddler is directed to place the veggies in a pot instead of the latrine, is that a good thing or a bad thing?
Kinda funny, 'progressive' groups immobilized because they're afraid to use 'language of the right' to critique nonsense within their organizations.
Whether its external infiltration from the right or these groups are really that incompetent and self-obsessed either way it's pretty embarrassing.
It's a perfect way to sew disorder and inability to function, maybe people feel they must all be perfect and internally 'comfortable' w each other @ all times to get anything done.
Well then, is there some point for some people when "the broader lesson" is no longer understood in which they could be functional? The world is filled with Boxers.The instruction to the toddler to put the veggies in a pot rather than the latrine is presumably one part of a broader lesson in how to prepare veggies, rather than an exercise of arbitrary authority. If the toddler did not come to adulthood understanding why the veggies go in the pot rather than the latrine, then the community has salvaged some vegetables at the cost of a functioning member; not a great trade, you'll agree.
wokism is not conducive to open and honest discussion
Prioritizing the end goal?Because it looks a little like how the US 90s-10s religious right, low tax lobby, gun lobby etc were able to disagree with each other and yet never threatened each other.
What is this relationship?
Well then, is there some point for some people when "the broader lesson" is no longer understood in which they could be functional? The world is filled with Boxers.
You say this, but I notice that you don't discuss your pet subjects with each other. And I wonder if theres something in that.
Because it looks a little like how the US 90s-10s religious right, low tax lobby, gun lobby etc were able to disagree with each other and yet never threatened each other.
What is this relationship? Reciprocal blindspots? Single issue cooperation? Just good discipline and cohesion?
The instruction to the toddler to put the veggies in a pot rather than the latrine is presumably one part of a broader lesson in how to prepare veggies, rather than an exercise of arbitrary authority. If the toddler did not come to adulthood understanding why the veggies go in the pot rather than the latrine, then the community has salvaged some vegetables at the cost of a functioning member; not a great trade, you'll agree.
Not at all. However, both you and @Traitorfish seem to be ascribing some negative connotation to taking direction (aka learning) and TF seems to be making some bold claims regarding human nature and psychology.This is quite an insight into the conservative mind. "People are like children who need a parent to tell them what to do 'because I say so'. Also I believe in freedom and I hate the Democrats for wanting to take care of people with a nanny state"
taking direction (aka learning)
Did they teach (coerce/instuct/indoctrinate... insert your preferred subjective narrative) to pick cotton improperly?I mean, not really at all, but I too am capable of stripping something someone else said out of context and pretending it has a totally different meaning. Quick question for you: were the overseers just teaching the slaves how to pick cotton properly? (see, literally anyone can do that trick!)
Did they teach (coerce/instuct/indoctrinate... insert your preferred subjective narrative) to pick cotton improperly?