Two people? Me and who else? Clearly white privelege either dosen't exist, or also exist for other races. Post me an example of this famous "white priveldge" and i'll give you counter examples.
"Two" as in "You and Domination". As for "examples", that would be oversimplifying it; white privilege is not to be understood as a series of personal privileges, but as a collective privileged, which is to say the institutionalised social and economic primacy of a particular group, in this case European-Americans or "whites". Of course, that itself is a simplification, as the realities of ethnicity colour the fiction of race, leading to sub-racial hierarchies, although many of those are becoming less prominent (while a Lebanese-American may still be discriminated against, an Irish-American will rarely be). It is also simplistic in that it is overly Eurocentric (ironically, this is a symptom of the system), and ignores the broader racial hierarchy that places East Asians-Americans above South Asian-Americans, South Asians above African-Americans, etc. As such, it can indeed be argued that certain "races" are privileged over others, but within a hierarchy, rather than independently.
There's always something missing in our hearts. A void that only the belief of God existence could fill. People always fantasize on some very omnipotent and creator-of-all Elohim, mainly because we perceive things as they're already there.
I would strongly disagree. Most primitive religions are shamanistic, animistic and/or pantheistic in nature, gradually evolving into a form of polytheism that does not necessarily invoke a particular creator-deity. Some religions have retained this, such as Shinto and Taoism, while others, such as Hinduism, differ drastically in their interpretation of "god". Take Gaelic mythology- that includes a string of divine races, none including a particular creator god, and all subservient to a greater universal essence; in one story, the Gaels actually earn their place in Ireland by calling upon the land herself to aid them in their struggle against the Gods, who has themselves seized it from several earlier god-tribes who had
themselves once been conquerors. Needless to say, this rather contradicts the idea of spirituality as the inevitable veneration of a single, all-powerful creator-patriarch.
IMO, there would be little to no religion on Earth if we are already scientifically advance enough, probably 10,000 years ago, to know that we are made up of cells and that we can consider bacteria as our forefathers. If that was the case, then Thor wouldn't be the God of Thunder, but rather a brand of technosuits, energy weapons, and defense mechanisms. Also, Helena would probably be the new name for Uranium.
I think this represents a fairly fundamental misunderstanding of pagan and animistic belief; gods are not fictional characters, at least first and foremost, but personifications of concepts, objects or phenomena. Thor is the thunder god because he is thunder personified (among other things), he is not simply the Power Ranger that got assigned that particular zord. The later characterisation, which you seem to be reflecting, represents a monotheistic world view, in which gods are grand, definite things, and not simply a particular power or significant rank of animistic being; pagans had no such clear cut distinction- as reflected by historical records, myths, and surviving pagan or pagan-derived faiths- instead treating a local river spirit and the God of the Seas as the same basic breed of entity (and, in a broader sense, all living things, tangible and intangible, as related).
(Which is, among other things, why I, personally, consider paganism/animism entirely compatible and relevant to the modern world. It isn't, at it's heart, about formally explaining the world, but about understanding and expressing the experience of it. We may know that Thor has never actually rode across the sky, that Manannán mac Lir has never stirred up a storm or that Amaterasu has never made the sun rise, but that does not diminish them as poetic expressions of such phenomena.)
