"Would you . . . ?" Part Two: Scum and Stammerer. (Presidential Debate Thread)

Status
Not open for further replies.
But that is only because Trump’s talking points put a lighter cognitive load on him in that they don’t need any logical connection.
He's better at playing the game.

Biden tried harder, he thought harder, so what? That's not the point.

Two beer commercials : one stating 57% of beer drinkers prefer our beer over the control group in a study of 10,532 Americans carriesdout in Michigan last year..
... 😴😴😴

Second one : dorky guy drinks the beer and his grubby clothes spin and magically change to classy ones, he walks down the street as the birds sing along to the theme music and a pretty girl walks past and gives him the eye. :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:

Two minutes to talk is an advertisement, not a lecture, keep it snappy Joe
 
That's not the point.
Yes it is the point.

Trump won the debate--for the reasons you give. The debate revealed that Biden would be a more able president than Trump.

What was the purpose of the debate?

Your earlier metaphors are apt. If two people are playing chess in a park, and a third guy comes with a bowling ball and knocks down all the pieces, he wins. At bowling. It's an empty victory. It's the people standing around the chessboard who need to be clear on the matter.

Let's imagine a voter who does care about the size of the debt. Which of the two candidates gave an answer that indicated how he would reduce it?
 
a flower pot in place of Bidon will get the same amount of votes . Here in 2023 it was a single WC room slipper as long as everybody voted against the PM . PM's defeat would have saved the country and averted financial crisis , end the grounds for seperatist stuff , clear out those types who were turning people into atheists , make Democracy far stronger . As every ill of New Turkey somehow relates to PM being the single decision maker ; his people are always adamant that he would fix anything wrong if he was aware of it and so on , since they will not risk their positions with taking initiative . As such people who think should rather search for stuff that will break the hold of the system . Which is designed to serve big money by giving false hopes to might-have-been-Leftists-if-pushed-too-hard Middle Income Center . You are falling off the cliff . Who cares if Bidon is smarter than Trump when the latter becomes President for Life and assigns his crown prince or princess ?

off the cliff , if you people didn't get it in the first time .
 
I'm so glad election debates are being compared to beer adverts. I feel like that's a really strong comparison.
I think regardless of the debate format, the candidates are still going to steer to the blipvert. I don’t think it’s due to shortening attention spans, but media coverage tending to be heavy on short clips.

I’m not sure how you would get around that.
 
I think regardless of the debate format, the candidates are still going to steer to the blipvert. I don’t think it’s due to shortening attention spans, but media coverage tending to be heavy on short clips.

I’m not sure how you would get around that.
That's fair, but I'd still watch a beer advert over any debate (longer than the span of a commercial advert). Admittedly, mainly because I'm too lazy to use adblockers. Even political adverts don't come across the same way as "hey, here's something you can consume". Nevermind debates.
 
Hi! We're all ****ed.

See signature.
 
Gori, answer honestly. It Biden were your pops would you be comfortable with him managing his own medications?
 
Biden does not act alone at all. He has smart people around him for advice and counsel. Trump is the kind of person who does act alone on his gut feelings without advice.
 
You think Trump manages his own ****? :lol:

They're all pathetic specialist manchildren.
 
Let's imagine a voter who does care about the size of the debt. Which of the two candidates gave an answer that indicated how he would reduce it?
Biden can give a more articulate bunch of bull about he he would reduce it, Trump will give will give a more entertaining one. Will either of them do it? Unlikely.

One acknowledges radical reform is necessary. He's right about that. He's bats*** crazy and he makes a mockery of these silly debates and promises that won't be kept but people let him do it because these debates are already a joke and have been for my lifetime at least.
 
No, Narz. It's a sign that Trump plays chess the way a pigeon does.

In an unhurried context--one of his rallies, say--he would speak the same way. It arises from a specific limitation in his cognitive abilities. It is one to which we have long become accustomed/numbed. Samson gets at it when he says Trump's mind works with "tokens." But if the question is cognitive ability, then this limitation of his should be brought back into full focus, not just ceded him as "oh that's just Trump."

Elections have been Chess: Pigeon Rules edition though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom