Ray, please don't make a false oath

You are right, I was
really wrong.

(
Improvement Effects are
not included in the Yield calculation of the
existing Mouse Over - which should be changed though.)
Then my question is simply:
Why not
simply include the information of the Improvement into the
existing "Mouse Over Help".

(It is personal taste, but I do not like to
add additional places to explain such thing if there
already is a place where such things are explained.)
Thus I suggest simply the following:
(By improving the existing "Mouse Over".)
- Flat Base Yield
- Flat Bonus Increase
- Flat River Increase
- Flat Improvement Increase (For all its aspects)
- Expert Percentage Modifier
- Rebel Sentiment Percentage Modifier
- City Health Percentage Modifier
Then we have
all that information cleanly in one place.

(And we will also explain to the player
how the Total Yields are calculated.)
----
This is the place where the info for the
Improvement belongs to my opinion.
(As I said, it is the existing Mouse Over.)
----
See, I do
not ask my questions to
annoy, judge or criticise.

(Even if it may sometimes sound like it.)
I ask them to suggest an idea that
may be a cleaner or better solution.
(But of course, it is
all my personal taste but I simply
like things cleaned up in the place where it belongs for me ...)
----
@inaiwae
Sorry I did really
simply not understand what you did.
- My brain simply did not understand why you did not use the existing Mouse Over Help and improve it and added a new one instead ...
- And my brain also did not understand how the Player should know that there are 2 different Mouse Over Help if we would not give it a visible icon ...
---
I added it to DLL as part of widget enhancement
Great, that is something I wanted to hear.

(Since I simply did not understand why you created a new Widget I was confused about that.)
I am not sure why you picked it as a major theme of your post
Simply because I did not understand
how the player should know that there are
2 Mouse Over Helps on almost he same place if there was
no visible icon to tell him.
Thus I thought that you had created
some visualization for it.
---
I really only ask such questions
to understand and maybe find the
best solution for WTP ...
And no,
you really did
not start asking for integration,
but others did, so
we had to discuss.
---
If
nobody would have
asked about integration, I swear
I would not have opened my mouth ...
I really
do not care what other modders do, but I
do care what
people want us to integrate in WTP ...
---
Sorry if you felt that I attacked your work - which was
not my intention.

I
fully understand that and often feel the same, when somebody asks such questions.
We are
simply modders by heart.

"Question my concept and implementaion again and I will bite off your head and eat it !!!!"

(If you read our threads you should have seen me react like that a couple of times as well.)
But again,
once discussion start about integration into WTP I will ask such things - no matter who starts that discussion.
Because I really only want to have the best possible solution integrated in the mod ... (And thus we may have to
discuss what was really done or different ideas.)