And Hillary's team was the sharpest ever assembled in the history of Man. Sharpness is over-rated, hence Trump.
Sometimes her handlers made mistakes.
And Hillary's team was the sharpest ever assembled in the history of Man. Sharpness is over-rated, hence Trump.
Yeah man. During the Obamacare debate there was a lot of people I worked with at restaurants and other unskilled labor jobs that were really turned off by the heavy-handed messaging of the right and a few that began to tentatively embrace socialism in name (and situationally) if not in reality. Same when it came to the way Missouri disgracefully repealed minimum wage increases because 'socialism'. The harder and harder the right pushes, the more they are going to get pushback from people that normally wouldn't pay attention.
I'm not predicting anything with certainty, just noting that the over the top rhetoric and extreme tactics of the right against 'socialism' can have an opposite effect as to what's intended. Hell, the way they obsess over AOC and Bernie on Fox has provided a lot of people with at least an idea of what socialism is that they wouldn't have otherwise gotten.
Look how quickly Trump has flipped the script on embracing open and virulent racism in normal political discourse. It's probably fair to argue that the undercurrents of racism were always there in a way that socialist undercurrents were not but we're only a couple of generations removed from very big, socialist projects like the New Deal and the Great Society (I think that's what LBJ called it). Point being that these things can turn on a dime in ways that are hard to predict. The extreme push against AOC et al is destabilizing the system and the shakeup could go either way even if it's not likely to go in the direction of socialism at the moment.The key to your comment was your use of "FEW". Few doesn't win elections.
Maybe someday Socialism won't be the bogie man but that day is not here yet.
People who complain about socialism, well most of them, we taught in the public education system. A damning indictment of socialism, i think.
Note the use of terms that don't include socialism. There was a reason for that.socialist projects like the New Deal and the Great Society (I think that's what LBJ called it).
Did not stop the right from calling it that. Let's not act like people were ignorant of what the programs were even if they weren't marketed as such. And I know I'm repeating it but the way everything has been called socialism now means nothing is and it both gives cover to people like Bernie and AOC and emboldens them. I can't imagine another major politician full-on embracing open socialism before Bernie and he's no longer the only one out there.Note the use of terms that don't include socialism. There was a reason for that.
But they were and still are. That's how we got Trump.Let's not act like people were ignorant
Let's not act like people were ignorant of what the programs were even if they weren't marketed as such.
@rah That's fair. I would point to the fact that he won in a fluke and didn't get a majority of the popular vote but point taken.
@Timsup2nothin - they did call it social security! But yeah, your point is taken too.
We're too busy trying to out-virtue signal and out-woke each other that we don't have time to take anything for granted!My fear is that dems will take it for granted again and the same result will occur.
love it or leave it is not a racist sentiment, it was the refrain of hypocritical uberpatriots to anti-war protesters during Vietnam
Yep, no denying that. The only problem is Hillary's team did not take Trump seriously. They thought he'd be beat based on Trump's poor character. They also seemed to have a blind spot for Hillary's own flaws. She had a lot of money but she was a terrible candidate.And Hillary's team was the sharpest ever assembled in the history of Man. Sharpness is over-rated, hence Trump.
but she was a terrible candidate
When it is specifically targeted at people who "look like they are from somewhere else" it becomes clearly a racist sentiment. Context man, context.
Aw, crap.
Fell for it again.
Berzerker comes wildly out of left field and says some rando thing, and the thread turns on its head.
My apologies.
Except at that point the US had three political parties that were socialist. One was even a communist party. The New Deal was a concession to the rising socialist movement in the US.If they had called it "socialism security" even right in the middle of the depression USians would have opted to starve first.