Patine
Deity
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 12,053
I know but for the most part they fought a conventional war.
Makes surrendering easier espicially if your whole unit surrenders. Guerilla warfare tends to get very dirty. They don't fight conventionally so soldiers aren't that inclined to take prisoners.
But sovereign, recognized nations use guerilla warfare today. This is one of the biggest reason that, despite the huge, overbloated military budgets and high-tech equipment, nations like the U.S., UK, France, Israel, the Soviet Union/Russia, and China have such pitiful victory records in terms of wars won in the post-WW2 era (only a tiny minority of those wars fought by any of those nations in the post-WW2 can credibly or sanely be called victories). The use of guerilla warfare today, and the general lack of it's use in the U.S. Civil War has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the "legitimacy," of nationhood or whether their armed forces were considered militaries or insurgencies, but ENTIRELY to do with the changes in the general nature of warfare across the board between then and today. Your point there is utterly trounced.