Absolute Capitalism

Nazism is left wing economically, fascism is right wing, that is the difference

Concerning the bolded part, I hope you're trying to speak objectively here (as in, Mussolini said the Jews, etc. were ruining Italy) and not what you think. Correct?

correct

No. Read up on Mussoloni's manifesto. It opposed laissez-faire economic policy before the Great Depression, and fascists promoted their ideology as a third way between capitalism and communism. It's not as centrally planned as communism, either in theory or practice, but either way still more economically interventionalist than your average western capitalist democracy today.

Than y is fascism Right wing, if that is correct it should be center
 
Than y is fascism Right wing, if that is correct it should be center

Because whether or not something is right wing does not depend on how economically interventionist it is; that is modern revisionism. That has never been the case - Bismarck isn't somehow a centrist just because he had an interventionist economic policy.
 
Tru, guess i should stop calling myself a fascist then...
but militaristic capitalism takes 2 long 2 say

Try "Asian." May I suggest a name change to Il Lee Kuan Yew 349?
 
k, an interesting bit of history, but y him?
Im nothing like him, I lack courage and he lacks brains. China is probably the closest modern day example of the capitalist system i dream about, it is run by a dictator, and is very capitalist. no min wage, high disparity between classes (a sign that the system is almost perfect), low taxes, low government interference in business (In the late 90s/early00s china decided to let american companies control a bulk of the Chinese economy, as a result, they have no control over the business)
 
48 of the 50 largest companies in China are owned by the Chinese government (don't ask me to source that, I read it here at CFC last year). That is definitely government control of business.
 
He was the guy that stood in front of the tank at Tienanmen Square, and in exile rose to become the CEO of the Bank of Taiwan (the free China.)

:lmao:

Is there something in the sushi ?
 
48 of the 50 largest companies in China are owned by the Chinese government (don't ask me to source that, I read it here at CFC last year). That is definitely government control of business.

Really? according to Wikipedia, 52 of the 100 largest are state owned. I doubt it would be that much of a difference. Also according to a different Wikipedia article, china since the early 90s has been slowly privatizing big buisnesses
 
Since the 70s, China has started becoming more and more right wing, economically they currently have something in between corporatism and capitalism. Politically they r authoritarian. In the political spectrum they would probably be considered fascist. Give them a few more years, 30 years from now they will be an absolute capitalist, but 40 years from now they will be communist. 2048 is when China runs out of coal, considering their entire economy runs on coal power, they will loose 85% of their energy, the developed nation will probably collapse as a result, and the communist regime of moa, where everybody is poor except him will be reborn. either that or the price of energy skyrockets as the energy companies start using wind, hydro and Nuclear. Nuclear would work well in china, just a realization. It takes more then 3 times the time to build a Nuclear Power Plant then a coal plant, but other then that, nuclear is superior in every way (and in china the length of time to build something is less then a 10th of the time here, the second largest airport in the world took 20 years to build, the largest built by the Chinese for the Beijing Olympics took under a year to build). Cheaper (the price of Nuclear energy is 2.6c vs 2.7c for coal, then 3c for hydro, 7c for wind, and 16c for solar) cleaner (considered to be as clean as solar energy, but wind and hydro are cleaner) more available (at the current rate we use them Coal is gone by the late 2040s early 2050s while we still have hundreds or thousands of years left 4 our Uranium). It take 2 weeks for china to build a coal plant, and should take 2 or 3 months to build a nuclear plant. They should get 2 it, as it could save them an energy crisis in a few years time
 
With what, a bump? And nothing to add to the discussion? How can you expect the discussion to resume when you've given us nothing else to discuss?
 
Free market is not entirely free. Monopolies emerge, dominate the market, and it's no longer free.

Any intervention against monopoly, plays a role of governmental intervention, is interventionist economy policy.
 
Back
Top Bottom