Little Faith
Warlord
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 183
No, the map is stupid for a couple of reasons.
It is true that the indigenous people inhabiting Greenland, northern Canada, northern Alaska and the northeastern corner of Asia belong to the same ethnic group, namely the Inuits.
But then the map puts Lapland, Svalbard and a couple of Russian arctic isles into the mix as well.
The Saami of Lapland have no relation to the Inuit, neither linguistically, genetically nor culturally. Any shared identity would solely rest in both being indigenous groups inhabiting grim arctic wastelands. I don't think Svalbard had any indigenous population before Norwegian whalers and Russian miners made it their base of operations.
And the various Russian isles, if they had any indigenous population it would probably be of some central Asian ethnicity.
It is true that the indigenous people inhabiting Greenland, northern Canada, northern Alaska and the northeastern corner of Asia belong to the same ethnic group, namely the Inuits.
But then the map puts Lapland, Svalbard and a couple of Russian arctic isles into the mix as well.
The Saami of Lapland have no relation to the Inuit, neither linguistically, genetically nor culturally. Any shared identity would solely rest in both being indigenous groups inhabiting grim arctic wastelands. I don't think Svalbard had any indigenous population before Norwegian whalers and Russian miners made it their base of operations.
And the various Russian isles, if they had any indigenous population it would probably be of some central Asian ethnicity.