(APRIL FOOLS) Apolyton & CivFanatics Merging!

Status
Not open for further replies.
also, as CFC is the flagship Civ fan site, merging it with Poly would only bring us down and up you guys to a higher level, since we have more mods, better OT, and more active site in general.

Be careful what you say in the presence of famous Apolytoners ;).

Seriously, while I recognize that CFC is currently the better Civ site, especially for modding, and I like the CFC OT better (which is subjecive and most on Poly would differ), I think many people here are also underrating Apolyton - it's not just "that other ugly site" :).
 
(btw, on the off chance this merger is real, I join the Insurgency/Resistance/whatever it's called)

We prefer to call ourselves the "United Civvers", though you may use any term you wish. The resistance / insurgency is the armed wing of our revolution. :crazyeye:
 
Well, if it is true, TF, write a Wikipedia entry for it. If it is not done by the time this thread reaches 25 pages (I know, not very long) I will begin my permabanning. :joke:
Or, you could just write a stub (an article baisically saying that something exists and 15 words about it. For example, "Civjunction is a forum that combines the services of two previous Civilization forum fansites Civfanatics and Apolyton.) Again, :joke:
And I don't think it's a joke. If it were a joke, it would be called Civaton or Apolyciv.
Okay, enough with the April Fool's discussion. :deadhorse:
 
ok, April 1st is officially over here since 7+ hours, so now you can announce that this was all a joke and let the spam stop, thanks :D
 
Oh, and I hope that civjunction is more civfanatics-y than apolyton-y. The way I see it, Civfanatics is to PC as Apolyton is to Mac (if you couldn't tell, I'm a PC user). I'm saying that about the site itself, not the commutiny. I'm sure that Apolytonners are just the same as us.
And I have two ideas why there are more civfanaticsers that apolytonners: civfanatics looks better and doesn't require a first and last name. It is fun to have people only know you by a nickname.
 
No entry yet.
Another thing to add to the new site is my idea to show how many new posts there are in a thread form your My Account. And, for god's sake, please put it back to User CP.
And get rid of the ten character limit.
 
Well, if it is true, TF, write a Wikipedia entry for it. If it is not done by the time this thread reaches 25 pages (I know, not very long) I will begin my permabanning. :joke:
Or, you could just write a stub (an article baisically saying that something exists and 15 words about it. For example, "Civjunction is a forum that combines the services of two previous Civilization forum fansites Civfanatics and Apolyton.) Again, :joke:
And I don't think it's a joke. If it were a joke, it would be called Civaton or Apolyciv.
Okay, enough with the April Fool's discussion. :deadhorse:
I've just found this: http://www.aboutus.org/Civjunction.com

:(
 
And I have two ideas why there are more civfanaticsers that apolytonners: civfanatics looks better and doesn't require a first and last name. It is fun to have people only know you by a nickname.
:hmm: I've been on 'Poly for more than 5 years, and there are only two people there who know me by name.
 
Well, if it is true, TF, write a Wikipedia entry for it. If it is not done by the time this thread reaches 25 pages (I know, not very long) I will begin my permabanning. :joke:
Or, you could just write a stub (an article baisically saying that something exists and 15 words about it. For example, "Civjunction is a forum that combines the services of two previous Civilization forum fansites Civfanatics and Apolyton.) Again, :joke:
And I don't think it's a joke. If it were a joke, it would be called Civaton or Apolyciv.
Okay, enough with the April Fool's discussion. :deadhorse:

Can't do such a thing. Wikipedia requires reliable sources - no reliable source on the merge outside of the pages itself.
 
:hmm: I've been on 'Poly for more than 5 years, and there are only two people there who know me by name.
I tried to register, but is asked me for my first and last name. I then decided not to.
EDIT: IIRC
 
If it is a hoax, then the folks at CPC are going to very extraordinary lenghts. Their original forum structure had two NES sites: one in Civ 4 and one in Civ 3. When I mentioned that NESing was not related to either, they set up a separate forum and removed the ones under Civ. That seems a bit much for a hoax that would be exposed wihtin a few hours.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom