Ask a person who identifies as femmekin

You know, the world is truly an amazing place already, without just making stuff up.
Well, the claim like this is not impossible considering that over billion of people believes in guy who was killed and then, they say, ressurected by a Supreme Being (being this being at the same time). But it would be nice to hear more developed theology (or should I say -- otherology?) besides the bold claim of otherkinness.
 
You know, the world is truly an amazing place already, without just making stuff up.

I think OP needs to clarify whether she thinks that she's an alien from another planet in a human body, or what.

Cause if not, then this all seems mostly sort of reasonable. If so, then it just seems plain crazy.
 
I'm fine with this:

apart, maybe from the hint of other worlds.

Then I read this:


You know, the world is truly an amazing place already, without just making stuff up.

But, of course, maybe this is all 100% true, and I'm simply a crazy old cynic.

Perhaps the weary truth is I've come across too much nutty stuff in the past to swallow just any old tale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Martindale

Ooh. Dominatrix!

So this lunatic is teaching children?
 
I don't think she's ever been a teacher of children. All her "pupils" in her "school" have been adult, as far as I know.

http://www.wildfireclub.co.uk/

Do note I post this link in good faith:
This site is dedicated to the discipline of females by females. It is not a sex site.

But if it contravenes CFC site rules, please delete it.
 
I think OP needs to clarify whether she thinks that she's an alien from another planet in a human body, or what.

Cause if not, then this all seems mostly sort of reasonable. If so, then it just seems plain crazy.
Agreed, because we already had this discussion (minus the female/male material) in the still-unresolved Ask an Atlanteologist thread (which that OP has apparently abandoned).

Dusters, if you're claiming aliens really exist, please provide links to peer-reviewed articles from reputable scientific journals where the objective evidence is shown. You are making an extraordinary claim. That requires extraordinary evidence.
 
To be fair our visiting Atlanteologist did maintain that Atlantis was simply allegorical.

It could be the case that claiming to be an alien inhabiting a human body is also a metaphor for a sense of alienation(!).

Generally feeling out of place in the world?

Who hasn't experienced this? Someone incredibly lucky, perhaps.


Link to video.
(Yay! Toyah Wilcox!)

This stuff is really weird. I don't think I've ever come across anything quite like it.

edit: but perhaps it's only unfamiliarity that makes it seem weird.
 
To be fair our visiting Atlanteologist did maintain that Atlantis was simply allegorical.
He also talked about artifacts in secret museums and posted a bunch of videos that claimed to be true regarding the movements and locations of the planets. The videos were pure drivel, and I'm not required to believe anyone when they talk about artifacts that "prove" his case but can't be shown because they're "secret."
 
I agree. You can't claim something is allegorical and then proceed as if it's literally true too.

Er... or can you? Don't we do that all the time? When we wax lyrical about a sunset, or something.
 
It's plainly bizarre.

It takes a lot to astonish me (I hope). But I'm frankly astonished.


Spoiler :
The Poet W.B.Yeats coined the phrase “Science is the opium of the suburbs”.

It was, of course, a parody of the phrase “Religion is the opium of the masses”, usually attributed to Marx (actually Marx stole it from Charles Kingsley), and far truer than the original ever was.

This week we have seen, in this very weblog, a fascinating example of just how that opium works. It was provided by a correspondent named Don Knotts who came in cursing and swearing and left like a gentleman. We have no wish to prolong the debate with Mr Knotts, or to criticise him personally; but he says he will no longer visit these pages (which are, after all, intended for femmekin), so we think it is reasonable to use his comments as an example of a tendency that extends far beyond Mr Knotts himself and gives us interesting food for reflection.

The essence of Mr Knotts’s argument [read it here], once he had stopped behaving like a drunk, was to paint a (very creditable) word-picture of the vastness of space and time, as indicated by astro-physics; the catastrophic (in earthly terms) nature of long-term cosmic events and the insignificance of our current earthly life when compared to the endless vistas of light years, the death of suns, the clash of galaxies and so forth.

His challenge was that if [we] were to take a telescope and look at the distant heavens the scales would fall from our eyes (to use a Biblical term that Mr Knotts would likely deprecate) and we should see the terrible folly of believing ourselves to be femmekin, or anything other than good suburban late-West-Tellurian cits.

The psychology of this assumption is remarkable. It is something like the way a Christian might expect worldly delusions to vanish in the face of the contemplation of Death, Heaven and Hell; but Mr Knotts, we gather, is an agnostic wedded to the “religion of science” and the comfortable, if rather anthropomorphic, idea that “science is on the side of everyday reality”.

He seems to frequent sites that spend much of their time tut-tutting (well, actually cuss-cussing) about how terrible and crazy are people who believe anything outside the cosy, suburban world of mundane materialism and vulgar cynicism, and how worrying it all is. Why it should worry them we don’t know, but it seems to be a sort of transposition of religious sentiment; a displacement of the heresy-hunting instinct, only this time not in the Name of God, but in the name of suburban dullness.

And somehow they believe (at least Mr Knotts does, and we are sure he is not alone) that they can call the very Heavens as witness to this religion of nothing-in-particular. Not the Heavens of traditional faith, of course (Darwin forbid!) but the Heavens of Professor Hawking.

He is perfectly sure that if we were really to look at those Heavens with a telescope, and ponder the mysteries of astro-physics, our belief that we are femmekin would vanish and we would see the Saving Light of Suburbia. We might even learn to use four-letter words like “real people”.

The idea simply cannot occur to such people that those same Heavens, whether or not we believe they are what the astro-physicists tell us they are (and we suspect that – on one level at least – they are, though we wouldn’t exactly bet the farm on it), dwarf the comfortable, cussing “realism” of the late-West-Telluri suburbs just as much as they dwarf anything else.

Oh no, the West-Telluri Suburbs are Reality, and Daddy Science is “on their side”.

Quite a touching faith, really.
http://otherkin.wordpress.com/2007/07/17/the-opium-of-the-suburbs/

Wut? I can almost see what the writer means.
 
Art nowadays typically refers to skillful activities that have aesthetic purposes. Martial arts typically focus more on combat/sport/self-defense effectiveness then aesthetic virtues.

Of course, there can be things of aesthetic value within martial arts, but as a discipline effectiveness is the primary motivation.

I am of the opinion that there can be aesthetic value in anything a human being might choose to do. To quote Christopher Walken in the movie 'Man on Fire': "A man can be an artist in anything".
 
So you were born as a boy? When did you start realizing you didn't feel comfortable in a traditional gender role identity?
 
@ Perf

I like symmetry in bodies. I like nice, beautiful bodies. I like to draw them. I like to paint them. I like that people pose for me nude. That's about it.

I wouldn't say i'm different. I like long dresses. I like skirts. I'm very natural when it comes to clothing, like linen and wool are my favourite materials.

I found the website after i meditated and tried to understand what's wrong with me.

@Nova

It is on my records. It's just atypical hermaphroditism, so to say.

@ Warpus

Human body is a new experience, i like it :)

Femmekin is not a diagnosis. Femmekin is a label. In ordinary daily life i just say i like to be called as Emilie. And if someone asks why, i try to explain that i feel like that name fits me.

@Snorrius

I claim to remember a past lifetime when I lived on a different planet. That's about it.


@Narz

I do have a penis. When i went to kindergarden i naturally tried to approach girls and play with them, but they didn't accept me. Boys didn't either. So i was totally alone. I spent my time in kindergarden crying, drinking water with sugar and doing math problems.
 
I heard about otherkins around the same time as the whole genderqueer zi/zho nonsense. It'll the next thing the left parades around.
 
@Rashiminos The answer is in the link, in OP.

@Perf

"I" lived as a human in USA. Years 1899 - 1983. "I" was in airforce. "I" had a wife and a daughter. I attended church. "My" wife was a journalist and cooked great pancakes. "I" spent most of my life in service, neglecting my family. "I" was trying to invent/engineer some upgrades. "I" flew F-10 and other types of aircraft. "My" grave is located in Nevada. "I" had a good friend of mine from military training in Switzerland. "I" really liked biplanes and parachuting.

a lot of other little things.
 
"I" lived as a human in USA. Years 1899 - 1983. "I" was in airforce. "I" flew F-10 and other types of aircraft. "My" grave is located in Nevada. "I" had a good friend of mine from military training in Switzerland. "I" really liked biplanes and parachuting.

and no , you didn't ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_F3D_Skyknight

for you would have to be some spectacularly influential Blue Belly to get into a USN jet after 1962 . You would be more like retired .
 
Back
Top Bottom