timtofly
One Day
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2009
- Messages
- 9,445
A major thought here is what is order to say nature brings it?
How do we define Order?
It is predictable?
A major thought here is what is order to say nature brings it?
How do we define Order?
A major thought here is what is order to say nature brings it?
How do we define Order?
So something disorderly is unpredictable and anything with order can be predicted?It is predictable?
Mathematics? I don't think Chaos theory deals with order and disorder, but with chaotic systems (System that heavily depend on their exact starting conditions).Mathematically. I think Chaos Theory deals with all these issues, but I'm not too familiar with the details.
Because religion and religious people constantly attempt to control my life and put religious laws in them. Oh and attempt to stop Scientific advancement in health and technology etc... They also want me in jail for being gay.Question from an apatheist.
Why bother?
It's not necessarily directed to the OP or the people answering in this thread, but some "active" atheists really leave me baffled.
I find apatheism a much more rational stance about the gods or religion in general. I mean, why go out of one's way to prove something completely irrational is... irrational.
No one feels the need to prove the sea isn't pink or tomorrow isn't going to rain faeces from the sky. It's simply not going to happen.
A "real" atheist, in my opinion, shouldn't even have an opinion about the topic.
If someone comes claiming his pen is going to fall upward when he drops it, I don't start a debate. I simply dismiss him as drunk, on drugs, mentally challenged or very ignorant.
Free will is almost certainly a false construct of our brains. But this doesn't mean that our brains can't make choices.
There's a really good summary of the current state of understanding here:
http://blog.case.edu/singham/free_will/index
It's in reverse chronological order, so start reading from the bottom.
Mathematics? I don't think Chaos theory deals with order and disorder, but with chaotic systems (System that heavily depend on their exact starting conditions).
You got any popular reading material about scientific definitions for Order?
The only one I know of comes from Entropy - disorder is defined as Entropy. And as entropy grows disorder grows -> and of course entropy growing is the basic thing behind nature. So technically we get less and less order.
A "real" atheist, in my opinion, shouldn't even have an opinion about the topic.
If someone comes claiming his pen is going to fall upward when he drops it, I don't start a debate. I simply dismiss him as drunk, on drugs, mentally challenged or very ignorant.
They're all interlinked topics and ideas, imo.
I don't think so. I have never heard of any connection between Entropy and Chaos theory. One is a mathematical subject for systems that depend greatly on starting conditions, and the other is a statistic way of managing the direction to which chemical and some physical system will move to.
BTW claiming we have more order now than when the universe begin would not be correct according to entropy laws. But that's mostly because there is no actually simple definition of order, only a mathematical one.
I really doubt chaos theory deals with order and complexity. I have found nothing to indicate it does.Both deal with order/disorder and the complexity of systems.
That's not exactly true. Entropy is a closed system trait. Cities aren't a closed system and so we cannot consider cities as pockets of order. And a city, as complex as it might get, is still far less orderly (in entropy measures) than the universe at the age of say, 5 million.We have localised pockets of order, such as the cities we build on this planet, etc. As a whole, entropy is increasing throughout the Universe though.
I really doubt chaos theory deals with order and complexity. I have found nothing to indicate it does.
That's not exactly true. Entropy is a closed system trait. Cities aren't a closed system and so we cannot consider cities as pockets of order. And a city, as complex as it might get, is still far less orderly (in entropy measures) than the universe at the age of say, 5 million.
Do you have a source for that?Chaos Theory in some cases deals with the emergency of complexity.
Nothing (except for the entire Universe) is a fully closed system though. If you want to talk about the entropy of systems that aren't the universe (or multiverse or whatever), then you've got to consider non-closed systems.
Do you have a source for that?
Chaos theory has investigated the sensitivity of systems to variations in initial conditions as one cause of complex behaviour.
True. I was going too far. But at least try something somewhat closed. A city is far far from a closed system. A factory is closer to it. But in both we only see an apparent rise in order because somewhere else there are huge drops in order...
sure
That's what my example meant to illustrate - while entropy increases as a whole, small pockets in the universe increase in order, the example being a city, or a factory, or whatever.
I heard you like analogiesHow can the universe be predictable (for the most part), but yet random at it's "core"?
That doesn't mean it's not predictable, merely that we missed a spot or variable...