Cuthillius
King
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2015
- Messages
- 695
Killing Sips will probably not leave us with much of any clues of who his fellow scum would be if he is. And it's even more of a wasted lynch if he's town.
Yeah, what about no?
You're gunning incredibly hard for my right now, I can't really understand why.
Yes, but compare it to Sips. If he's town--and I really don't see why he couldn't be per se, the evidence is very weak-- what do we gain from the lynch, particularly when most players are ducking in, leaving a vote, and exiting again right away? If someone like Edse, Mat, Sushi, or even I is lynched, there's more info regardless of alignment.Sushi has a lot of potential as an asset if he's left alive and town. Edse is a cunning player, but he's not going to be giving the same amount of information alive as an early investment. That makes him a fine lynch for data because there's less utility sacrifice early on if we're wrong.
I'm watching where the votes go and who's getting mentioned.How do you know where most people are looking? Maybe I'm mistaken, but the town isn't really a mob mentality now. It's more like a dozen overlapping dinner parties.
Fair enough, though FTR that post was more about pushing Legato to explain his reads/WTL than it was about giving generalities about town strategy. He drew my attention in an earlier post, I ISO'd him and wasn't a fan of him sheeping Murska onto Choxorn (questioned that in the post before the one you're quoting), and then he mentioned he'd be willing to switch to Jarema for 'reasons' that he declined to give for a reason I found suspicious. I want his thoughts explained.Also, whoops, forgot to refresh the page before I posted. There's something else I want to speak on.
FTR I very often make this kind of statement (i.e. generalities about town strategy) when I'm a wolf. Easier to fake being helpful with this kind of stuff than it is with reads. Don't know if that's alignment indicative for Cass or not, but it's something to keep in mind.
I really like this post.I don't understand why one of LL/Zack has to be scum. It's more likely landlubber than Zack, but as visor said, I can see town and town tunneling going on here.
What does this mean? Why King Morgan?
Question.... Why is Visor still on the top of your list, and why aren't you willing to vote Arakhor atm, even if he's on your top three scum list?
Murska's actually been slightly town for me, but there are a few things about vote timing, lynch preference, and vote reasoning that I don't quite like.
Why not yet? Why wait? What are your scum reads? Even better, could you give a want to lynch list for today?
Soooo. Do you want to lynch edse today, or are you just trying to redirect attention from you?
1. Okay, what's your WTL for today?
2. Very mixed, I'll address all of my reads in a later post, but right now I want to talk about you, Cass.
Spoiler :
1)Your tone seems very friendly. You're posting like you're lock town (as I recall from every game I've been wolf in and you've been town in, which is every game that we've played together...).
2)But... There's something I'm wary about. I usually doubt that you're town when you actually are. The way you phrase things and the way you interact with other people -- I look at them and I go... Wow, that's really scummy. But you balance that with hunting and paranoia.
3)Your first few posts here were calmer than I've ever seen. That's not a good sign. Your tone is amazing. Your interactions have nothing questionable except for that opening joke with Visor, who I'm now convinced is town. The way you've been giving your reads and leans create a world in which you can hide behind them, and not give something super precise and clear. For instance, in your last town game, you stated your reads list... A lot. You stated your WTL list.... A lot.
Another minor thing to consider, but it may be a major tell. We'll see post game.
4)Where are your emoticons? Town Cass always uses emoticons. Too many, iirc. Can't even quote them without breaking Dragonmount. You also seem to use them on PerC. This site has no lack of emoticons. This may seem super nitpicky, but I am bothered that you seem more controlled with your thought process here, and have been doing a lot less buddying, which is a common practice for you as town.
I think that you're scum, Cass. Something's wrong, and whatever you say doesn't fix it.
WIFOM
Defending of Cass, multiple examples in the thread. PIS. My thoughts similar to Glossy's:
Multiple cases made on multiple people, but yet this post:
Refusing to actually attempt to lynch people until you know the thoughts of multiple people first. Wanting to follow consenus, not wanting to go out on a limb yourself. So you can defend with 'I wasn't the only one who found him scummy and wanting to lynch him'. Further PIS
Also very strong OMGUS. I haven't even been voted (so far), and edse has suspicion, but is unlikely to be lynched today without someone championing it. Both however have voted for you.
I'm extremely interested in why Cuth has objections to Al Sips as a lynch. Made almost no posts about him (IIRC), but he is one of the main lynch candidates right now, and going up. Alternative bandwagon to defend scum buddy? If Cuth flips, Al Sips is my #1 suspect.
Has some evidence that Glossy will support his lynch (not concrete, but that Glossy could be persuaded). Only after this does he go for it.
Meta read on him also.
Shorter version: WIFOM, PIS, OMGUS, and not starting an attempt to lynch someone without having other people's views on the candidate first. Gut feeling, and very strong gut feeling on Al Sips/Cuth being scum team. If Cuth flips, will be unwilling to not vote for Al Sips.
I am defending Cass because last game I played with her nobody else had much experience with her and she got lynched later on as a PR after I'd died, while I could pretty strongly clear her based on playing completely differently but hadn't mentioned it. I will note that Mat/Cass is possible based off this.
that post was making sure glossy did not agree strongly with an edse lynch
how is that OMGUS? i agree my main justification for voting him is that he voted me, but not because of that. because of the way he said it and presented it. it's horrible
I feel like most of the justification on him is "mostly inactive, and that's a little funny". He's not anywhere near the scummiest of people.
That's the opposite of what I was doing. I'm proposing a lynch that might be more popular than my main target, but if my strongest scumread was actually okay with the lynch then I would stay miles away from it right now.
It's not a very good meta read, because she hasn't even said why it's similar; and it isn't at all.
I'm not sure what "PIS" is, but I'm not polling to see if it's a viable lynch, but rather to try and convince other people that I am correct. Which is the point.
Jarema is to me the iconic town slacker. When he's town he has a tendency to show up promptly twice a day and gives you nothing to go on. Eh, here's a vote, maybe a comment. Kay thanks see ya. He's not JTH (or Phantom from the Playground) unreadable, but he's clearly not here to give you consideration just for a convenient read. Here he looks like he's struggling to put in an effort. That's a bit of scum tell for him at times. But, the other explanation is he's floundering in the flood of posts.
Consensus among those who have played more with you seem to be that you're scummy.
If it's valid then it's by definition not an omgus.Is an OMGUS an OMGUS if it's valid? If so, is applying the label misrepresenting what it is?
If it's valid then it's by definition not an omgus.
I should clarify that the reasoning is what makes a vote an OMGUS, not the target's alignment. You can omgus a scumbag.If it's valid then it's by definition not an omgus.
i agree my main justification for voting him is that he voted me, but not because of that. because of the way he said it and presented it.
Yes obviously.are you talking about this?
/snip
Hmm. You might have one of those voices. Your style is very recognizable to me. It stands out in relief to the thread. It reminds me of two people I knew when I went under the handle 'Rift'.
See below.
1) Jarema is to me the iconic town slacker. When he's town he has a tendency to show up promptly twice a day and gives you nothing to go on. Eh, here's a vote, maybe a comment. Kay thanks see ya. He's not JTH (or Phantom from the Playground) unreadable, but he's clearly not here to give you consideration just for a convenient read. Here he looks like he's struggling to put in an effort. That's a bit of scum tell for him at times. But, the other explanation is he's floundering in the flood of posts.
2) I disagree a bit on leaving things out. Sometimes information abnegation is a town tool, it's just a precise one you have to think about. Same as lying. Same as voting for yourself, which I've done thrice, two of which to good effect. It's why Lassie's concessional argument rubs me wrong. My third game as town I saw Pizza come in and destroy 3 major preconceptions of how the game is played. It's influenced me in mafia ever since.
3) Regarding Murska: Apparently I combined two distinct posts in my mind when arrived at this conclusion. <_<;
Murska's town list resonated with me, especially as the other notable person in the thread who was against Cuth being lynched. I also am just biased against lynching Sushi now regardless of my read. Admittedly not much to go along. I'm not particularly inclined to seeing Visor go yet though. There's too many assumptions I see being made, and my read on Visor as a general player is a bit different, There's a bit of good tactics but perhaps not ideal strategy going along with his early death. This is not something I will elaborate on, as it.
I will admit though, Visor is acting very different. I'm just not sure what it means.
4) Earlier he said this, which conflated in my mind to be a more ringing endorsement of Choxorn's need to die. Need here being, eh, that sounds decent for day 1. Grah, I have to figure out someone new to change to.
*I make a general exception to people who simply aren't compositionally inclined, atypical neurology and the like, as they can be otherwise insightful. But anyone else brooks no such consideration.
I'm interested to know who the "We're" are, and if this phase is so important then perhaps it is worth a wolf defending his rep, the way this is phased makes me think LL has been having private conversations discussing game progress.Landlubber said:No one was implying that you were stupid. We're saying that this D1 is a lot more meaningful than you seem to be giving it credit for...
This reasoning could be read as; excuse my vote; hes a lurker, pressure him!!!, cast aspersions on potential town leader, i don't want my voting record to be informative in the future.Landlubber said:There are a few reasons why my vote on Al Sips doesn't have as much argument behind it. First, he's barely posted. Second, my vote is in large part a pressure vote. Third, a lot of the cases on the more complicated players, like sushi, have already been discussed. I chose to go for an alternative instead of beating a dead horse.
I'm interested to know who the "We're" are, and if this phase is so important then perhaps it is worth a wolf defending his rep, the way this is phased makes me think LL has been having private conversations discussing game progress.