It certainly translates as "that is a really idiotic reason", because that's why I said it. Besides, isn't jumping on stupid bandwagons also a scum sign?
Let's review my options:
A) vote for Cuthilius, because I always think he's scum, but that would be lazy, wouldn't it?
B) Vote for Lassie, because I don't like her game-style or because she has this really weird fetish for protecting Glossy, but no, Visorslash, pillar of the community (even when he's a serial killer), is never wrong, right?
C) Keep my vote on KM, because of his flinch and because there's well over 24 hours left to make a "proper" vote.
D) Any number of votes which would be perceived as OMGUS most likely.
I think A or B is fine. If you think someone is scum, vote for them. Frankly, I find your hesitance to do so because of some strange fear of being taken the wrong way is a much more common feeling for mafia to have than town. The sentiment in B is strange, seeing as Visor has been eviscerated for his play in this game.
You now say your vote stays on KingMorgan because he flinched, but I recall you repeatedly insisting that it was random without any further justification. Maybe I missed where you gave a legitimate reason for your vote, in which case can you link it?
Zack brings up one game (in which I was scum) where I was cautious in voting, yes. Suddenly that guarantees that I'm now scum? Carry on winning the game like that, by all means.
I brought up two recent games that ran simultaneously, one where you were mafia and the other where you were town, and noted the significant differences in your early game behavior. Kennigit also brings up a good point with NSP3, another game around the same time in which you were similarly non-committal as scum.
I never guaranteed anything or said it was certain. I don't know if you're just trying to get people to react to you the same way they did Lassie ("frustrated with attention, ergo town"), but you're being melodramatic. Is your suggestion that we all roll a dice to make our votes with no further discussion, would carrying on like that win us the game? How do you suggest we go about winning the game, then? "Not lynching me" isn't a meaningful answer.
How come you didn't make such a big deal about any other case that gained traction? Do you think they were all legitimate claims with a solid foundation? You're made that people are voting for you, but why should they instead vote for someone else?
Instead of lashing out at people voting you, make a convincing argument that there's someone better to vote for. Because right now, the case against you seems a lot stronger than anything else out there.
And remember, it's not personal. It's business.
