Well, one has to suppose that 40% Brexit party needs only 10% other pro-brexit parties/votes to be at 50% of the voters. Somehow it doesn't look like those for brexit are less than the 52% which set this procedure going.
And keep in mind that the Brexit Party single issue is not just being pro-brexit. It is being
pro-brexit without any deal: just leave.
(with anti-Brexit (and pro-Labour !) slowly growing, mainly because of demographical reasons: younger people have other opinions than older people)
That is absolutely, totally, provably false, you just have to look back at howw this adgument has been used time and again. "Euroskepticism" has
risen in the UK, which did had two referendums on furthering the process of "integration" that passed. If it were true that younger people would be "europhiles" and the "euroskeptics" would die out, they would be dead already. Instead their vote share
grew. Perhaps, have you considered, as people grow older some grow wiser about how their community words or
fails to work?
This talk of new voters, of the leavers dying out, is bullcrap. It is delaying tactics by the remainers, self-deluded and egged on by their
rivals within the EU. They fight they are putting up against brexit is wrecking the UK. It does not help them at all because their position cannot win, in the end they will lose, the UK will leave. But due to their constant obstructionism the UK is failing to fight the EU properly, and
it is a fight. Just ask the Swiss how the EU wields its power around when it thinks it has an advantage. The UK needs to be united to this fight,
everyone there loses from these divisions.
The UK must leave in order to move forward out of this political deadlock. And it must leave without a deal. And it should have prepared for that from the beginning.
Heve people there learned nothing from the greek trainwreck? When negotiating with the EU, the EU is your enemy and you cannot expect any favors of help from it. You must be prepared to walk out.
The Remainers, and other Pro EU posters, seem to assume that Jeremy Corbyn should lead his party on a long term anti-brexit campaign.
Me, I think he should have led on a pro-brexit campaign. The UK needs more honesty about the EU in its political discussion.
Corbyn could do it. If he wasn't constrained by some compromise not to split the party. I don't know if it was the right or wrong choice. But I do know that he is no beginner in politics, was always principled, and so I'm waiting out to see where his strategy leads. He's still the best possible hope for a competent PM to handle the rough times ahead for the UK, divided and left unprepared by the current incompetent government.
Brexit party + ukip + tories = 44% or something.
