Bug Reports and Technical Issues

It would be good to have one, even if not available by default.

 

noticed this one while rolling up a 1700AD-start for Argentina:



PS: Russia's research rate is just crazy in that scenario, in 1900 they are the no1 in science and get a tech every 3-4 turns Oo

EDIT:

- despite not having Corporations, Argentina starts with Free Market
- I switched to Mexico on my 2nd turn, they start with no civics (or rather the top ones, that require nothing) preselected. Is that intentional? Those 3 turns of Anarchy are quite mean.

 

Playing as the Romans, a Norse Galley appeared at 240 BC around Britain. That is perhaps a tiny bit too early.

 

These specific names for barbarian units are harmful to immersion more often than not, I am afraid.

 

Reason unknown, game hangs after end of turn.

 

thanks for fixing those. Python-exception at Mexican switch could have been, didn't see one but wasn't really paying attention anyway.

But this one could use some intervention as well:



sometime around 1930 Colombia collapsed and their cities became native - filled with warriors (independent cities get riflemen), I get that natives should be a bit behind, but warriors?^^

Also: I noticed many civs switching to guilds later on in the game after having discovered Corporations (thus unlocking Free Market). I feel like you might want to nudge the AI to prefer Free Market over Guilds when it has both of these options.

 

Tried a mayan game. I like the new goal more.
Could you make the 3rd goal to fail earlier, to avoid continuing a UHV game if it is already failed?
And if Mayas manage to discover Euros instead of vice versa, maybe they should be saved from plague and conquerors. And inverse conqueror event would be welcome too

 

Conquerors are a little implausible, but aversion to the plague is biologically impossible. I watched a National Geographic documentary about this, and the reason that the Europeans spread diseases to the Natives was because they (Europeans) had lived their lives around animals like cows, pigs, sheep, etc., thus immunizing them to the diseases those animals carried, such as smallpox and the swine flu. The natives had no immunity to such diseases, diseases which ran rampant around but which attracted little attention from the immunized Old Worlders. The reason that the Europeans didn't catch a "llama flu" is that no matter how close the Incas were with their llamas, they never ate their llamas. They were more like the donkey in Europe.

 

Peru in general is just weird. Are there plans to make it a rebirth?

 

Tamil start text mentions you are close to both China and Rome. I assume Rome should be India or something else instead (India is already mentioned earlier, but quite sure it's not supposed to be Rome).

Also, a congress was announced and I was told I wasn't important enough to be a part of it, however I got to pick a city and vote on all the decisions anyway. Is there a special rule for the human player, meaning you always get to participate?

 

In general, what's at fault for turn-specific CTDs? (It's my own WB scenario; crashes after 936 AD.)

 

not an expert on it, but the last one Leoreth mentioned were invalid unit movements by the AI. Usually uploading a save will get you some help. Or trying out which units might be problematic via world-builder-testing.

 

I'm not sure unit movements are the problem. I started another game with England and crashed on the same year.

Here: View attachment Kammu AD-0936 Turn 633.CivBeyondSwordSave

 

oh, I figured the Congress-message bug wasn't yet adressed, else I would have pointed it out as well, that it still is the same old "you're not important enough" message even though you are indeed a full participant (on the most recent SVNs)

will try to get you a save, but honestly, it is just like the last time I reported it^^

edit: just switched from Argentina to Colombia and this time I got control over them in 1817 (as opposed to the usual 1820) but again with no civics selected.

hope this save helps