Possible, but I think that one would limit the chances of the other, both being more Militaristic ME civs. Personally I think the Hittites have more chance, as we already have Babylon and Sumer for Mesopotamia.To those saying Hittites or Assyria: ¿Por qué no los dos?
Possible, but I think that one would limit the chances of the other, both being more Militaristic ME civs. Personally I think the Hittites have more chance, as we already have Babylon and Sumer for Mesopotamia.
Or all three of those combined.I hear you but truly nearly any civ can fill nearly any niche. Hittites could just as easily be a Religion or Production or Science based civ, right?
Virtually all the other Odawa chiefs and the other chiefs involved in Pontiac's Rebellion agreed that Pontiac was a reckless glory-hound. I think he'd be a poor choice.- Anishinaabe: Pontiac (need more indigenous North Americans imo, Anishinaabe would be novel)
There's plenty of room for a cultural/builder Assyria.Possible, but I think that one would limit the chances of the other, both being more Militaristic ME civs.
And we already have Byzantium and the Ottomans in northwestern Anatolia so from a TSL perspective (which I don't think is very relevant) it works out about the same.Personally I think the Hittites have more chance, as we already have Babylon and Sumer for Mesopotamia.
Somewhat nerding out: These are just lists of what we would want from a hypothetical second pass.Did they announce another season pass is likely, or are y'all just nerdin' out?
Somewhat nerding out: These are just lists of what we would want from a hypothetical second pass.
And tbh it's good but not "I'm going to sacrifice two cities good"...I just can't get past it being so absurdly expensive when I could just build more cities...
Finland