pre-release info Civilization VII - Content Spreadsheet Thread - Civ overview!

[Boris Gudenuf]

View attachment 717835

I think this could be an IP.

Very interesting if it is. The only 'Prophet's Town' I know of was established in 1808 by Tecumseh and his brother as the capital of their confederacy of native tribes. That would seem to associate it historically pretty thoroughly with Tecumseh, yet Leaders don't seem to be associated with any city lists in any other form.

Be a nice touch if they were, though . . .

 

[Alexander's Hetaroi]

Very interesting if it is. The only 'Prophet's Town' I know of was established in 1808 by Tecumseh and his brother as the capital of their confederacy of native tribes. That would seem to associate it historically pretty thoroughly with Tecumseh, yet Leaders don't seem to be associated with any city lists in any other form.

Be a nice touch if they were, though . . .

Yeah IP's are interesting in this game. It's a Modern IP, but the Shawnee themselves exist an age earlier.

On top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.

 

[Eagle Pursuit]

Were the Shawnee not present earlier in the game to potentially have lost the city?

 

[Zaarin]

On top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.

Definitely looking forward to some mods to clean up civs' city lists...as usual...

 

[Giskler]

Partially obscured for Laktoas is Paha Sapa.

 

[Giskler]

Were the Shawnee not present earlier in the game to potentially have lost the city?

Possibly, I can go back and have a look.

Edit: Yes, Shawnee were in Exploration so likely founded by them.

 

[Boris Gudenuf]

On top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.

That actually makes perfect sense: as any Bavarian will tell you, a Prussian Munich would NOT be the same city as a Bavarian Munich in any way that's important . . .

 

[Giskler]

That actually makes perfect sense: as any Bavarian will tell you, a Prussian Munich would NOT be the same city as a Bavarian Munich in any way that's important . . .

Well....

 

[Xandinho]

Yeah IP's are interesting in this game. It's a Modern IP, but the Shawnee themselves exist an age earlier.

On top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.

This is somewhat an immersion break. It would be better to leave Munich out of the Prussian cities entirely. That would even open up the possibility of a Bavaria civ later on. It’s strange because the way they designed Prussia, it’s definitely a unified German civ.

 

[Eagle Pursuit]

This is somewhat an immersion break. It would be better to leave Munich out of the Prussian cities entirely. That would even open up the possibility of a Bavaria civ later on. It’s strange because the way they designed Prussia, it’s definitely a unified German civ.

It's Germany except in name

 

[Alexander's Hetaroi]

View attachment 717845

Well....

Wait, was it an IP all this time and they just happened to conquer it?

Or maybe not because it's in the German language.

 

[Rac]

On top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.

Same thing happens in Exploration with Abbasid's Dimasq (I think it's literally written that way in the English loc.) and the IP Umayyad's Damascus

 

[Zaarin]

Same thing happens in Exploration with Abbasid's Dimasq (I think it's literally written that way in the English loc.) and the IP Umayyad's Damascus

Didn't this happen in Civ6, too, where Damascus was on three different city lists under three different names?

 

[Giskler]

This is Seoul I think.

 

[TheGhostEnthusiast]

Of the currently named IPs
Which ones do you want to be playable

Maori, please!

 

[Alexander's Hetaroi]

Same thing happens in Exploration with Abbasid's Dimasq (I think it's literally written that way in the English loc.) and the IP Umayyad's Damascus

I noticed Medina was an IP too in Exploration, but I haven't seen that city show up yet. You think it would due to its importance.

Didn't this happen in Civ6, too, where Damascus was on three different city lists under three different names?

I know Aleppo was on Arabia's twice, one as Aleppo and the other Halab. Not sure about Damascus.

Just checked that Halep (Aleppo) showed up for the Ottomans as well.

 

[Ryansinbela]

What type of IP are the Guarani

 

[Zaarin]

I know Aleppo was on Arabia's twice, one as Aleppo and the other Halab. Not sure about Damascus.

You're right, it was Aleppo. And I think maybe it was on Rome's city list, as well.

 

[ggmoyang]

View attachment 717849
This is Seoul I think.

Hanseong, the name of Seoul in Joseon period.

 

[Alexander's Hetaroi]

You're right, it was Aleppo. And I think maybe it was on Rome's city list, as well.

No, but they did have Palmyra.