- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 19,059
Were the Shawnee not present earlier in the game to potentially have lost the city?
Definitely looking forward to some mods to clean up civs' city lists...as usual...On top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.![]()
Possibly, I can go back and have a look.Were the Shawnee not present earlier in the game to potentially have lost the city?
That actually makes perfect sense: as any Bavarian will tell you, a Prussian Munich would NOT be the same city as a Bavarian Munich in any way that's important . . .On top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.![]()
That actually makes perfect sense: as any Bavarian will tell you, a Prussian Munich would NOT be the same city as a Bavarian Munich in any way that's important . . .

This is somewhat an immersion break. It would be better to leave Munich out of the Prussian cities entirely. That would even open up the possibility of a Bavaria civ later on. It’s strange because the way they designed Prussia, it’s definitely a unified German civ.Yeah IP's are interesting in this game. It's a Modern IP, but the Shawnee themselves exist an age earlier.
On top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.![]()
It's Germany except in nameThis is somewhat an immersion break. It would be better to leave Munich out of the Prussian cities entirely. That would even open up the possibility of a Bavaria civ later on. It’s strange because the way they designed Prussia, it’s definitely a unified German civ.
Wait, was it an IP all this time and they just happened to conquer it?


Same thing happens in Exploration with Abbasid's Dimasq (I think it's literally written that way in the English loc.) and the IP Umayyad's DamascusOn top of that Munich was just discovered as a Modern IP for Bavaria, yet München is also a city for Prussia.![]()
Didn't this happen in Civ6, too, where Damascus was on three different city lists under three different names?Same thing happens in Exploration with Abbasid's Dimasq (I think it's literally written that way in the English loc.) and the IP Umayyad's Damascus

Maori, please!Of the currently named IPs
Which ones do you want to be playable

I noticed Medina was an IP too in Exploration, but I haven't seen that city show up yet. You think it would due to its importance.Same thing happens in Exploration with Abbasid's Dimasq (I think it's literally written that way in the English loc.) and the IP Umayyad's Damascus
I know Aleppo was on Arabia's twice, one as Aleppo and the other Halab. Not sure about Damascus.Didn't this happen in Civ6, too, where Damascus was on three different city lists under three different names?![]()
You're right, it was Aleppo. And I think maybe it was on Rome's city list, as well.I know Aleppo was on Arabia's twice, one as Aleppo and the other Halab. Not sure about Damascus.
Hanseong, the name of Seoul in Joseon period.View attachment 717849
This is Seoul I think.
No, but they did have Palmyra.You're right, it was Aleppo. And I think maybe it was on Rome's city list, as well.
