River_Ghost
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2022
- Messages
- 34
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...orever-chemicals-in-drinking-water-180980270/
Beyond this. I rest my case.
Beyond this. I rest my case.
No, I am NOT of the belief that coal produces less carbon dioxide per unit energy.
Good catch! You caught my question, despite the fact that I typed it poorly. Sorry about that
Like I said, we are 25 years into the conversation. I wonder how this belief has been retained. Is this an outlier belief in your social group?
Not going to speculate on what others in England believe here on that, as that is a deviation from the thread topic.
It is a difficult question, that depends on leakage rate and the timescale we care about. I think the critical unknown is where the tipping points are. If what really matters is whether we get to 2 C over pre-industrial levels in the next 20 years to avoid methane hydrates breaking down then leaky Saudi LNG could well be worse. If what matters is the change over the next 200 years coal will be worse.Moved from Russia thread
I truly find this fascinating. I've been working on AGW advocacy for 25+ years now, enough time to see cycles in the counter-memes.
How can your belief have gotten into your head? You'd be doing me a big favor, because I've never seen someone (who I consider basically reasonable) hold that belief before.
Like, if I hold AGW as important, the something as simple as "LNG or coal?" is a very important question to both ask and then answer. And then, whoever is actually correct, should have that information spread into policy. Or, at least, get factored into the other ways those two sources are beneficial or damaging.
We lived in NC (outside of Chapel Hill) from the mid 60s until 1990. We had many cold winters with lots of snow and ice followed by ice storms in the spring. NM and OK are about the same latitude as NC and winters in the 90s in NM were similar to those in NC with significant snow and cold (snow on Halloween and in mid April) but with less rain. No more. By 2000 winters were warmer and shorter and the rain not happening. The trend has continued for the last 20 years.All that being said, I'm in my 20's, so I never really got to experience a pre-global warming world. My dad once mentioned that he remembered the winters in North Carolina being colder when he was a kid, and the stats back that up.
Buy stock in companies that make ice cream!It's been over 90 degrees in northwest Pennsylvania for at least 10 of the last 14 days. This is easily the most prolonged heat wave I've ever lived through here. The forecast for the coming week is saying we're going to get some relief, but this entire summer has been miserable.
britain used to have many more grape fields for wine in the bronze age afaik and the moors afaik are a result of deforestation followed by climate change, even at a slow paceMany civilizations in History were wiped out, without apparent reason.. Environmental Change increasingly seems to be the previously unidentified a driver. That was at a "natural" pace of many generations/centuries. We're going to experience it in the next 10 years.
‘Eight arms pulling you down’: octopus boom prompts joy and unease in Cornwall
I had heard we expected jellyfish to do better than bony fish in a warming world, which was a problem because jellyfish are not very tasty, but octopuses are really good, so I do not see this as such an issue.It appears that, allegedly as a consequence of global warming, octopuses are massing off the shores of Britain getting ready to invade:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...octopus-boom-prompts-joy-and-concern-cornwall
I am undecided as to whether to blame Macron or Putin?
I reckon they should put them in a blender, freeze them and sent them up North to feed farmed Alex Salmond.
Eating octopus is like eating whales and dolphins.I had heard we expected jellyfish to do better than bony fish in a warming world, which was a problem because jellyfish are not very tasty, but octopuses are really good, so I do not see this as such an issue.
Why? Because they are similarly intelligent, or similarly rare?Eating octopus is like eating whales and dolphins.![]()
They are highly intelligent and we should start somewhere in in thinking about consuming intelligent life. Endangered should not be the only criteria for not eating.Why? Because they are similarly intelligent, or similarly rare?
They are intelligent, and have recently been acknowledged as worthy of animal welfare protections equivalent to vertebrates in the UK. I do not think there is any evidence they are as intelligent as pigs, let alone dolphins and whales.They are highly intelligent and we should start somewhere in in thinking about consuming intelligent life. Endangered should not be the only criteria for not eating.
Interesting.Unlike Europe and Canada, the USA has only really felt the Global Warming starting around 2016 since we are at lower latitudes I'd say.
Cooking every year, it is slowly starting to sink in now.