Terxpahseyton
Nobody
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2006
- Messages
- 10,759
HITLER
oh, not this time.
But it could have been Hitler.
oh, not this time.
But it could have been Hitler.
I thought Magna Carta meant that no one is above the law.Georgie, of course. III to be precise. Well, I suppose not above the law so much as being the law.
Police Culture as described by Thomas Nolan (27 years in Boston PD, Massachusetts, USA): http://met-research.bu.edu/met-ert/Site Pages/ExtLinked/CJMET/Nolan Men and Masculinities.pdf
Reading that makes me wonder if all human activity isn't merely the result of repressed sexual energy.
But if your job is to be men dominating other men, I suppose it had to go there.
Didn't know cops who call for help too often get labeled #@*%$^&.
The guy is a 27 year police veteran, so it must be true.
Actually, American reformers repeatedly appealed to George III to rise above the law and neutralise parliament's authority over them, arguing with distinctly absolutist undertones that Britain and the colonies were bound only by the person of the monarch, from who all political authority flowed, and not through the institution of parliament. It was his scrupulous constitutionalism, his consistent affirmation of parliament's right in the colonies, that lead to the reformers' break with the Crown.Georgie, of course. III to be precise. Well, I suppose not above the law so much as being the law.
Hush, you! That narrative doesn't sound as patriotic as declaring our independence from a man who did blah blah blah on his own!
It's amazing how much the lessons of history change when actual history is taught.There's danger there. If it became common knowledge that the revolution wasn't against a king, but against an unresponsive and irresponsible legislature, a lot of people may well say "hey, we have one of those right here and right now!"
You must have missed almost every line that begins with "He has..." Regardless of parliament being the real issue or not, Ol' Tommy Boy was brilliant in building it all up around a single man our horribly oppressed ancestors could rally against.
(disclaimer: Had I been born in the 1740s or so with the same mentality as I have now, I say with almost certainty that I'd have been a loyalist. Thank The Maker I was born in the 1960s so I could grow up into a well-rounded Reaganite!)
Thank The Maker I was born in the 1960s so I could grow up into a well-rounded Reaganite!)
The guy is a 27 year police veteran, so it must be true.
Jesus, an 8 reasons/10 reasons article that can't decide if it's 8 or 10 reasons. Am I supposed to think it worth reading?