Criminal huggers

[aelf]

I never know quite what to make of you, Mr E. Some of your opinions are off the range nasty, but you express them with such candor and lack of ill-feeling.

He's either a troll or someone with very low intelligence. I can't quite decide which and it's confusing me so... I'll go and hug a beautiful criminal instead.

 

[Oruc]

Nope!

 

[Borachio]

He's either a troll or someone with very low intelligence. I can't quite decide which and it's confusing me so... I'll go and hug a beautiful criminal instead.

I don't think Mr E is either a troll or of low intelligence.

Find me a beautiful criminal as well, will you?

 

[Bugfatty300]

What do you mean you people?

Assaulting someone is quite serious I don't see how you can argue against it? Do you often assault other men? Is freedom to assault in the USofA's Constitution? You'll have to clue me in I'm not American.

Edit: Law and order type? I suppose that makes it easier for you to dismiss my questions but I wouldn't say I am.

Police and prosecutors often make distinctions between punching someone randomly for no reason versus punching someone who is asking for it.

 

[Lone Wolf]

I thought that thread is about criminals who do some sinister hugging.

 

[NedimNapoleon]

I've hugged a criminal.

 

[aelf]

I don't think Mr E is either a troll or of low intelligence.

Then maybe he's a genius that sees beyond what all of us can see.

I've hugged a criminal.

And you think you liked it?

 

[NedimNapoleon]

Well I like hugging myself.

 

[AlpsStranger]

You will notice I never said either of these, you appear to be talking to someone else.

I was responding to "the table" through you. Apologies.

You assumed that, I was asking a question and wondering why you were handwaving assault away with the attitude "they're men they should be able to handle it".

Not at all. If a man wants to mind his own business and another man just picks a fight he deserves to get a little time. I'm talking about a situation where a fight happens, mutually, and is taken way, way too seriously by the police/prosecutor.

Keep in mind, BOTH HE AND I were more or less run over by the system. I'm not simply bitter that I got in trouble and he didn't.

 

[Leoreth]

I thought that thread is about criminals who do some sinister hugging.

I associated people who hug you to steal your wallet. Which would have been a better subject to talk about.

 

[Oruc]

Nope!

 

[Ailedhoo]

I question the purpose of this thread. Even for the Tavern its purpose is... not fit even for the Tavern.

 

[Zack]

Is it me or are some people here "Criminal huggers" and want to defend them when they do something wrong?

I agree with you. Anyone who drives even .01 mph over the speed limit deserves a slow, tortuous death funded by the federal government and nationally televised on Disney Channel.

 

[Bugfatty300]

I agree with you. Anyone who drives even .01 mph over the speed limit deserves a slow, tortuous death funded by the federal government and nationally televised on Disney Channel.

Sheesh. Not another one of you bleeding heart .01ers.

Death to speeders who exceed .000001 mph over the speed limit. You give em 2 decimal points they'll take 4.

 

[El_Machinae]

Nope. You the criminal hugger. He deserves to go to jail.

Maybe. But it would be a bit of a waste of taxpayer dollars. There's a balance to be had.

 

[JollyRoger]

Why do they even have to go over the speed limit? Being in possession of a vehicle capable of going over the speed limit should be enough to justify hugging them to death.

 

[Mr. Dictator]

Criminal hugger? No...I just don't support further alienating people who've fallen into anti-social behavior.

 

[PlutonianEmpire]

Funny thread, really.

"On topic", I don't know if I ever hugged a criminal, but I know two of my brothers are going to prison for very long times.

 

[Ailedhoo]

I support the ending of this thread, just since its purpose is for ELITE to pass labels around without much cause. I question this "criminal huggers" label and why one has to make a thread around it. Considerative the insultaive nature of the thread it seems the "don't be a jerk" rule has been broken. That rule is the rule the Tavern maintains. ELITE has demonstration a clear case of why you attack the argument as oppose to the arguer by showing that those that attack the arguer are... of weak notion of cause as demonstration clear by ELITE. Special note to the comments on Alp by ELITE which shows a lack of empathy and consideration on ELITE's part. Hence more I suggest this thread is useless even for the Tavern and as such it locking, with ELITE getting a lecture on the forum rules, is a need that must be upholded.

If you wish to talk about attitudes to the law then I suggest the Chamber, a place for CIVILIZED talks, as a place of talk. It might encourage ELITE to learn how to debate instead of making immature commentry.

 

[rugbyLEAGUEfan]

I never realized until now how annoying ALLCAPS user names are