Daily Mail posits terrifying new European war

I think the scenario is pretty ridiculous and makes little sense. However, I aplaud its admitting a dirty little secret few like to talk about: In a UK vs France matchup the UK will lose.
 
I think the scenario is pretty ridiculous and makes little sense. However, I aplaud its admitting a dirty little secret few like to talk about: In a UK vs France matchup the UK will lose.

Thats not much of a secret.
 
Now I see what the new carriers are for. I think the UK would still lose, though, if those are tied up with bombing their poorer suburbs back home.
 
I have to say, this article is patenty ridiculous, and Merkel's comments were scaremongering, but her basic point is true. Europe does not have some ingrained right to peace.
 
I think the scenario is pretty ridiculous and makes little sense. However, I aplaud its admitting a dirty little secret few like to talk about: In a UK vs France matchup the UK will lose.

How does that work out? Britain and France are pretty much twins economically and militarily, surely it would be a stalemate?
 
How long until someone makes a Civilization scenario out of this?
 
How does that work out? Britain and France are pretty much twins economically and militarily, surely it would be a stalemate?

Their military spending is not the same though. France doesn't have to rely on the sea for energy, and since both Gibralter is within range of their land based aircraft and currently the UK has no serious carrier force to speak of making the Med a French lake only vulerable to a an outnumberd British sub force is a real possiblity.

At the same time a good portion of UK sea lanes are will within French air attack range.

The idea of Britian landing a land force able to create and hen hold a continental foothold is not really a serious position. Since Britian has let is navy degrade so badly, it literally has no advantage of France at all, and France has the natrual advantage of not being an island. You bottle up the UK as best as you can, and wait them out.
 
How long until someone makes a Civilization scenario out of this?
Challenge accepted.
 
Their military spending is not the same though. France doesn't have to rely on the sea for energy, and since both Gibralter is within range of their land based aircraft and currently the UK has no serious carrier force to speak of making the Med a French lake only vulerable to a an outnumberd British sub force is a real possiblity.

At the same time a good portion of UK sea lanes are will within French air attack range.

The idea of Britian landing a land force able to create and hen hold a continental foothold is not really a serious position. Since Britian has let is navy degrade so badly, it literally has no advantage of France at all, and France has the natrual advantage of not being an island. You bottle up the UK as best as you can, and wait them out.

Could France really starve the UK out with its present navy?
 
This seems to be akin to those apocalyptic war scenarios I see mentioned but never quoted in detail during the buildup to WW1.

Also, lolwut?
 
Before Daily Mail opinion writers became journalists, I guess.
 
Bah, when the EU goes to hell whichever country had a government crazy enough to send "peacekeepers" into another would find itself at war against more than it could handle, with a revolution simultaneously brewing at home and only fed by the war - it wouldn't be like WW1, with idiots enlisting for the "glory" of it and forgetting the troubles at home; it would be a hated war.

I mentioned that Sarkozy wouldn't be stupid enough. On second though, he's the type which might be stupid enough. He - and the french fifth republic - would last about two weeks. And then... well, if any opposing blocks again truly form in Europe, they'll be opposed across the Rhine. As usual. And britain would be on the french side, again.
 
If I was Sarkozy I'd be looking forward to retirement with his new baby and his hot wife, myself.

EDIT: The Daily Mail probably just annoyed that Merkel is mildly more attractive than Thatcher, and Carla Bruni is far hotter than "gorse face" Samantha Cameron. Even Gordon Brown's wife is hotter than Mrs. Cameron ;)

EDIT2: I meant "horse face" btw.
 
Back
Top Bottom