ales_
Heir
Leoreth, will you update them? Because as I understand these are not you plans now.
Dawn of Civilization - an RFC modmod by Leoreth
- Thread starter Leoreth
- Start date
- Status
Edit the CNM and upload it here, that's the easiest way to get me to apply it to the modAgain, these are just nitpicks of mine, but I think it can never hurt to expand and revise the city name maps.
Sure they are. "Future" is a conveniently vague word.
ales_
Heir
So you are planning to merge in K-mod in 1.11?
At least partially, yes. It was the AI stuff which was creating problems, which admittedly is the most important aspect of K-Mod but speed improvements, its new features and the BUG interface will be in at some point.
SheaferDaDawg
Intelligent Canine
AI can never be added for all I care, as long as I get the speed improvements
Edit the CNM and upload it here, that's the easiest way to get me to apply it to the mod
I'll see what I can do.
AlistairMac
Chieftain
quick (3) question why do i loose a heck of alot of stability from normalization?
and what is normalization?
and how do i go about reducing it?
any help would be good
and what is normalization?
and how do i go about reducing it?
any help would be good
Two things are displayed as normalization:
- your stability also depends on the overall stability of all civs. If everyone is stable, normalization results in stability hits and vice versa, so that there are always some slightly stable and some slightly unstable civs, at least. You can think of it as a mechanism that makes sure that the average stability of all civs is roughly zero.
- very stable (over 40) and very unstable (-40) civs get stability bonuses/penalties to bring them down a bit or give them some chance over time, respectively.
Both are more or less "internal" changes you can't really influence. I chose to display them anyway so the overall values make more sense.
- your stability also depends on the overall stability of all civs. If everyone is stable, normalization results in stability hits and vice versa, so that there are always some slightly stable and some slightly unstable civs, at least. You can think of it as a mechanism that makes sure that the average stability of all civs is roughly zero.
- very stable (over 40) and very unstable (-40) civs get stability bonuses/penalties to bring them down a bit or give them some chance over time, respectively.
Both are more or less "internal" changes you can't really influence. I chose to display them anyway so the overall values make more sense.
I'm having a bit of trouble with the city names map, since I can't quite visualize how each of the entries matches up with the tiles in-game. Do the tile spots in the file ignore ocean/water tiles?
Open it in excel and make all the cells a standard square dimension, it is easier to visualise that way.
Welcome to the tedium that is editing the CNM. Civ_king's advice is good though, keep the game open and use already labeled tiles like Constantinople as a starting point.
strijder20
Wallowing in irony
I'm not sure if this is just coincidence or not, but when the Reformation started the Contrareformation civs all declared on me before I decided whether to stay catholic or go become protestant.
SheaferDaDawg
Intelligent Canine
If I build the Opera House in a city, and draft troops from it, I have noticed that the unhappiness has no effect on the city. Does it affect overall stability? Otherwise, one can build the Opera house in a high growth city and spam the draft button to make armies overnight.
strijder20
Wallowing in irony
EDIT: Ah, my fault. I didn't realise my Aztec vassal had already adopted Catholicism and joined the Reformation.
I think it still affects stability.
Well, the question is if that's desirable. On one hand, I guess it's appropriate that vassals can choose differently from their masters, but pulling them into wars against their own brothers of faith seems too much.
could you make it so that you can either join the reformation like normal or join the counterreformation, cutting off your ties with your (now ex) vassal? and vice versa if your vassal joins the counterreformation against you
That's rather complicated to implement because the AI choices and their repercussions are handled one turn before the player gets to make his choice.
It's probably easier to exclude vassals from declarations of war completely and leave this decision to their masters. Since you cannot play as a vassal this can't be exploited.
Edit: doing that was easier than expected, because vassals were already unable to join the counter-reformation. Now I've made them unable to become the target of a counter-reforming civ when they've chosen to embrace the Reformation as well.
It's probably easier to exclude vassals from declarations of war completely and leave this decision to their masters. Since you cannot play as a vassal this can't be exploited.
Edit: doing that was easier than expected, because vassals were already unable to join the counter-reformation. Now I've made them unable to become the target of a counter-reforming civ when they've chosen to embrace the Reformation as well.
Airrifle48942
Warlord
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 175
I'm just wondering what kind of computer is needed to run this mod, what details so I can keep them in mind? I have a very slow computer so it freezes during the 1500's.
- Status
