yung.carl.jung
Hey Bird! I'm Morose & Lugubrious
these posts are getting so layered they're like my midnight sandwiches..
these posts are getting so layered they're like my midnight sandwiches..
Bread, peanut butter, small marshmellows, American cheese, PB, marshmellows, bread, PB, marshmellows, cheese, PB, marshmellows, bread.
DANISH SANDWICHES ARE KNOWN FOR BEING OPEN AND NOT HAVING ANY REAL LAYERS
/national localist particularism joke
/altho seriously danish restaurants sometimes pride themselves over these things https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smørrebrød
/i just tried being funny seeing that tim is much more funnier than me I HAVE TO TRY DENMARK #1 SO MUCH IMPORTANT COUNTRY
That looks delish!!DANISH SANDWICHES ARE KNOWN FOR BEING OPEN AND NOT HAVING ANY REAL LAYERS
/national localist particularism joke
/altho seriously danish restaurants sometimes pride themselves over these things https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smørrebrød
/i just tried being funny seeing that tim is much more funnier than me I HAVE TO TRY DENMARK #1 SO MUCH IMPORTANT COUNTRY
It's actually extremely tasty stuff. If you ever visit, make sure you pass by a smørrebrøds-maker.That looks delish!!![]()
The English word "history" itself reflects male dominance.HIStory guys not RUSSIANTSARstory.
Ok but as long as it's ourparliament.The English word "history" itself reflects male dominance.
I propose to use hertory instead.
If I ever pass by LA I promise I'll stop by.
(I'm vegetarian tho so it's been a while since I've eaten them with meat, and so it'll be tough. But I'll promise to try.)
I actually had to have this argument with someone earlier this year.The English word "history" itself reflects male dominance.
I propose to use hertory instead.
I mean, if I was going to find something to object to in the dominant way of public history education in the English speaking, it would be the uncritical adherence a narrowly Protestant-Whiggish triumphal narrative, rather than, like, "insufficiently Ottoman". Challenge this stuff on its ground, as a history of this semi-mythical "Anglosphere" (itself a construction of this Protestant-Whig narrative to which supposedly Anglo-critical commentators are surprisingly deferential) before expecting us to handle the rest of the world without screwing it up.1. I am annoyed with Anglospherians "knowing history" in a very lopsided way in general.
I.e. it's either incredibly blinders-down Anglo-history or it's some pseudo-woke "world history" that gives ever so mildly condescending credit to all the cute "brown" peoples who could (this is usually about Mali or about Swahili traders or Majapahit; it's curiously never about the Taungu and Ayutthaya or about Ming China or about the Ottoman Empire at any point before 1811; and it sure as heck makes a strenuous effort to pretend continental Europe doesn't exist).
I'm not buying this. You went to the trouble of constructing 10 riddles. The total meaning of your rant is going to lie in the total meaning of those ten riddles. They have to be cracked each in turn, then their aggregate meaning assembled.You guys are making this way too complicated.
I mean, if I was going to find something to object to in the dominant way of public history education in the English speaking, it would be the uncritical adherence a narrowly Protestant-Whiggish triumphal narrative, rather than, like, "insufficiently Ottoman". Challenge this stuff on its ground, as a history of this semi-mythical "Anglosphere" (itself a construction of this Protestant-Whig narrative to which supposedly Anglo-critical commentators are surprisingly deferential) before expecting us to handle the rest of the world without screwing it up.
Also, I don't know where you're getting this idea that Mali or Majapahit figure large in Western historical education... Except that both of these kingdoms happened to feature in recent episodes of the animated YouTube channel, ExtraHistory, which seems a bizarrely narrow sample.
It's LA. I'm sure they'll have a vegetarian option.
Sure, but they probably weren't so insufferably Protestant about the whole thing.I mean, this also seems to imply that that wasn't a Thing German and French social thinkers/historians were doing at precisely the same time.