Jehoshua
Catholic
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 7,284
Presuming the Ardavan segment referred to me, I did not second-guess Thlayli's knowledge of Ardavan at all. I simply disagreed on the most likely trajectory of the Vithanama Empire (Thlayli's points are incidentally entirely valid, I just think that multiple compounding circumstances [dislocation, demographic imbalance in favour of natives, fragile hold on Empire and various other things] make nativisation theoretically more likely than the alternative).
On an aside though, I think its foolish to be hostile to inquiry and questioning on any topic (particularly in the context of a game). Spewing forth belligerence whenever someone questions some little thing, only makes the relevant party appear immature and petty. People receiving such queries should just step out of their ivory towers, point out why the inquirer is wrong defending their position, and move on to something else. So much better than angry bickering no?
On an aside though, I think its foolish to be hostile to inquiry and questioning on any topic (particularly in the context of a game). Spewing forth belligerence whenever someone questions some little thing, only makes the relevant party appear immature and petty. People receiving such queries should just step out of their ivory towers, point out why the inquirer is wrong defending their position, and move on to something else. So much better than angry bickering no?