EU looks East, proposes new partnership to the Eastern countries

Winner

Diverse in Unity
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
27,947
Location
Brno -> Czech rep. >>European Union
Something tells me that Moscow won't like this :)

EU sets out Eastern Partnership plans

The EU's Eastern Partnership with former Soviet states will demonstrate the “power of soft power”, European Commission's president says.

The European Commission today presented proposals for an enhanced formal relationship that could see the creation of “comprehensive” free-trade relationships with five former Soviet states.

Presenting the plans for the new ‘Eastern Partnership' on 3 December, José Manuel Barroso, the European Commission's president, said that “the message [to the five countries] is clear: we want to help you with the political and economic challenges you are facing”.

The Eastern Partnership will supersede and go beyond the EU's current European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) with the five countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. The door has also been left open to a sixth country, Belarus.

Barroso said he was convinced that the Partnership would demonstrate the “power of soft power” and acknowledged that the conflict in Georgia in August had influenced the decision to launch the Partnership. He nonetheless insisted that the proposal should not be seen as an attempt to establish a “sphere of influence” vis-à-vis Russia. “We don't need a new Cold War,” he said. “We need cool heads.”

No prospect of EU membership

As expected, the proposal for the Eastern Partnership, which has been championed by Sweden, Poland and the Czech Republic and which will be launched at a specially convened summit during the Czech presidency of the EU next year, does not give the five countries a road-map to EU membership. It does offer ‘association agreements' to any of them that make sufficient reforms, an agreement that has in the past meant that a country has a long-term prospect of joining the EU. However, an ‘association agreement' given to Ukraine in September was not accompanied by any suggestion that Ukraine might ultimately become a member of the EU and today, while saying that Ukraine will be the “avant-garde” of the group, Barroso ruled out offering Ukraine the prospect of EU membership for the time being.

“We have made most progress with Ukraine and have strong bilateral relations with Kiev, but an association agreement is all we can offer Ukraine,” the Commission president said.

Proposals

The association agreement envisaged within the Eastern Partnership would include the establishment of a “deep and comprehensive” free-trade agreement with a partner country, once it has joined the World Trade Organization (WTO). The EU will also encourage the partner countries to establish a free-trade network among themselves, which it hopes might in the long term lead them to create an economic community.

Benita Ferrero-Waldner, the European commissioner for external affairs, did not rule out the possibility that Alyaksandr Lukashenka, Belarus's president, could attend the launch of the Partnership, which could occur in April. She said, however, that Belarus, the only country whose participation in the Partnership is uncertain, still has much to do before it can be considered “mature” either in the framework of the ENP or of the Eastern Partnership.

The partnership includes both bilateral initiatives, targeted to needs of each individual country, and multilateral programmes. A total of €600 million will be set aside to be spent between 2010 and 2013. Most of that sum (€350 million) will be fresh money. The remainder (€250) will come from the redeployment of resources from current aid programmes.

Ferrero-Waldner revealed that a conference to raise funds for investment in upgrading Ukraine's pipelines is planned for the spring and also said that the EU is keen for Ukraine and Moldova to move from being observers of the European Energy Community to becoming full members. Brussels is also keen on signing memoranda of understanding with the three southern Caucasian republics on their relationship with the Energy Community, which sets up a regulatory framework for its members. Georgia currently has observer status. Neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan have a formal relationship with the grouping.

Bilateral initiatives in the proposals include talks aimed first at waiving visa fees and, in the longer term, at ending visa requirements. Pledges to support a comprehensive institution-building programme and further assistance with economic and social development are also included in the package, as is mutual energy security.

The package also contains five multilateral initiatives, with programmes on integrated border management; on technical and financial assistance for small and medium-sized enterprises; on developing plans for a future southern energy corridor; on improvements to regional electricity markets; and on preventing man-made disasters and preparing for natural disasters and man-made disasters. All are designed with an eye to encouraging the Partnership's member countries to pool their experiences in these areas.

Source: European Voice


EU press release:

Spoiler :
The Eastern Partnership –an ambitious new chapter in the EU's relations with its Eastern neighbours

The Commission's proposal for a new Eastern Partnership represents a step change in the EU’s relations with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus[1], Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. This ambitious Partnership foresees a substantial upgrading of the level of political engagement, including the prospect of a new generation of Association Agreements, far-reaching integration into the EU economy, easier travel to the EU for citizens providing that security requirements are met, enhanced energy security arrangements benefitting all concerned, and increased financial assistance. The EU proposes much more intensive day to day support for partners' reform efforts through a new Comprehensive Institution Building programme, and a new multilateral dimension which will bring partners together to address common challenges. The new Partnership includes new measures to support the social and economic development of the 6 countries, and five flagship initiatives that will give very concrete evidence of the EU's support.

President José Manuel Barroso stated: “Only with strong political will and commitment on both sides will the Eastern Partnership achieve its objective of political association and economic integration. We need to make an even greater investment in mutual stability and prosperity. This will be quickly compensated by important political and economic benefits and will lead to more stability and security both for the EU and for our Eastern partners.”

“The time is ripe to open a new chapter in relations with our Eastern neighbours” –Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy Benita Ferrero-Waldner added. “Building on the progress of the last years we have prepared an ambitious and at the same time well-balanced offer. The security and stability of the EU is affected by events taking place in Eastern Europe and in the Southern Caucasus. Our policy towards these countries should be strong, proactive and unequivocal. The EU will continue with the successful approach of tailor-made programmes on a new scale and add a strong multilateral dimension. It remains our principle though that progress must go hand in hand with reform efforts by our partners, but this new package also offers more intensive assistance to help them meet their goals."

The Eastern Partnership responds to the desire of the EU's Eastern neighbours to move closer to the European Union. Yet, it is also in the EU’s vital interest to contribute to the development of stability, better governance and economic development at its Eastern borders.

Since 1989 sweeping changes have occurred on the EU’s eastern flank. Successive enlargements have brought greater geographic proximity with our Eastern neighbours, while reforms supported by the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) have brought these countries politically and economically closer to the EU. The EU has a growing responsibility to the partners to help them address the political and economic challenges they face and support their aspirations for closer ties, not least in the light of the conflict in Georgia last summer. Following the conflict in the Caucasus the European Council of the 1st September requested the Commission to present its proposal earlier than previously foreseen.

Following consultations with the Eastern Partners the Commission proposes to engage more deeply bilateral relations with the Eastern Partners and to launch a new multilateral framework for cooperation. The main new points of the initiative are:

New association agreements including deep and comprehensive free trade agreements for those willing and ready to take on the far-reaching commitments with the EU that these entail;

Comprehensive programmes funded by the EU to improve partners’ administrative capacity;

Gradual integration into the EU economy (with the asymmetry appropriate to the partners’ economies) including legally binding commitments on regulatory approximation;

Encourage partners to develop a free trade network between themselves which could in the longer term join up into a Neighbourhood Economic Community

The conclusion of “mobility and security pacts”, allowing for easier legitimate travel to the EU while at the same time stepping up efforts to combat corruption, organized crime and illegal migration. These pacts would also cover the upgrading asylum systems to EU standards and the establishment of integrated border management structures, etc. the ultimate goal being visa-free travel with all cooperating partners;

The Commission will study possibilities for labour mobility with the aim of opening the EU labour market further;

Enhanced energy security for the EU and its Eastern Partners;

Programmes addressing economic and social development in the partner countries, particularly addressing sharp economic and social disparities in their countries

Creation of four multilateral policy platforms: on Democracy, good governance and stability; Economic integration and convergence with EU policies, Energy security; and Contacts between people to further support partners' individual reform efforts

Flagship initiatives: Integrated Border Management Programme; SME facility; promotion of Regional electricity markets, energy efficiency and renewable energy sources; development of the Southern energy corridor; and co operation on Prevention, preparedness for and response to natural and man-made disasters

More people-to-people contacts and greater involvement of civil society and other stakeholders, including the European Parliament;

Additional Financial Assistance – a substantial increase from € 450 million in 2008 to € 785 million in 2013. This means a supplementary envelope of € 350 million in addition to the planned resources for 2010-2013. Moreover we will redeploy €250 million already allocated to the ENP regional programmes.

The Commission proposes to launch this initiative in spring 2009 at a special “Eastern Partnership Summit”.

Translation: "follow us and we'll help you to modernize, give you money and one day we might even consider giving you a membership". See the repeated mention of energy security? It's clear Brussels wants to use this to challenge Russia's gas transportation monopoly.

Side note: cooperation with Eastern European countries is a top priority for the Czech Rep.'s EU presidency.

Wiki article:

Spoiler :


The Eastern Partnership is a project which was formally proposed to be initiated by the European Union (EU). It was presented by the foreign minister of Poland with assistance from Sweden at a the EU's General Affairs and External Relations Council in Brussels on 26 May 2008.[1]

It is meant to complement the Northern Dimension and the Union for the Mediterranean by providing an institutionalised forum for discussing visa agreements, free trade deals and strategic partnership agreements with the EU's eastern neighbours, while avoiding the controversial topic of accession to the European Union. Its geographical scope is to consist of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine.[2] Belarus will only participate at a technical level (due to the EU's opposition to Alexander Lukashenko, whom it considers a dictator), while Russia will be invited to participate in some local initiatives, for instance regarding its Kaliningrad Oblast exclave. Unlike the Union for the Mediterranean, the Eastern Partnership will not have its own secretariat, but would be controlled directly by the European Commission.[3]

It was discussed at the European Council on 19 June and 20 June 2008, together with the Union for the Mediterranean.[4]

The Czech Republic endorses the proposal completely, while Bulgaria and Romania are cautious, fearing that the Black Sea Forum for Partnership and Dialogue and the Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation could be undermined. Meanwhile, Germany, France and others are not quite happy with the possibility that the Eastern Partnership will be seen as a stepping stone to membership (especially for Ukraine), while Poland and other Eastern states have explicitly welcomed this effect.[5]

There are plans to model the concept on the Stabilisation and Association Process used by the EU in the Balkans, including a possible free trade area encompassing the countries in the region, similar to BAFTA or CEFTA. A membership perspective for 2020 or later is not ruled out, either.[6]
 
I like it. I like it a lot

Bringing the East into the EU will antagonize Russia too much.

But this... this helps bring the east into the 21st century and eventually into de-facto western orbit. And Russia can't say a damn thing. In time, they will join. In time, Russia might join. I am talking in terms of decades however.

To top it all off, the EU wouldn't have to deal with a even greater flood of immigrants. It is a pretty big problem now, but bringing the east into EU would basically open the floodgate.
 
Well, it seems that Brussels is on the way to learn how to play this kind of a game.

You see, Russia bases its influence in Eastern Europe and Caucasus on the good old carrot&stick tactics. Be nice to Putin, and you'll get oil and natural gas cheaper. Betray Mother Russia, and she will punish you by cutting oil/gas supplies, imposing economic embargo and if you're a really bad boym for example if you want your territory back, she'll throw some bombs as a bonus.

If the EU wants to win in this game, it has to follow suit: follow us, and we'll fully open markets for your goods, we'll help you with the modernization, we'll fund the development of your infrastructure, we'll make it easier for your people to travel and work in Europe and in some point in the future, we might even offer you a membership.

Clearly, the EU is much stronger than Russia economically (the biggest economy in the world), so if it really commits, it can draw the Eastern countries to its orbit, protect them from Russia's wrath and help them Westernize.

See, they even offered this to Lukashenko, in order to widen the rift between him and Putin :lol:

Is it a power game? Yes, partially. But being in EU's orbit is MUCH better than being in Russia's orbit. I can tell.
 
Hmm this is a pleasant surprise from the constant whining about how the EU is apparantly caving to Russian 'threats'.
 
If the EU wants to win in this game, it has to follow suit:
In the case of EU the real suit is:
follow us, and we'll fully open markets for your goods,
Follow us, and fully open your markets for our goods.
we'll help you with the modernization,
We will help you with de-industrialization, and our TNCs will happily buy what will left after, and in return we will give you a lot of cheap loans so your economy could crush later, and you were our debtors forever.
we'll fund the development of your infrastructure,
We will help you to close down your nuclear power plants, and even compensate you some cost of scrapping it.
we'll make it easier for your people to travel and work in Europe
We need cheap labour and solution for our demographic problems. Why developing your own industry and infrastructure if you can just work in our already developed countries?
and in some point in the future, we might even offer you a membership.
Feel cheated? Do not mind it - one day we will offer you a membership so you could be cool.
 
Hmm this is a pleasant surprise from the constant whining about how the EU is apparantly caving to Russian 'threats'.

The best thing on this is, that it's no half-hearted "we will offer any verbal support we have at our disposal" kind of useless gesture, or some reckless sabre-rattling without substance. This actually looks as constructive and ration use of soft power.
 
In the case of EU the real suit is:

Follow us, and fully open your markets for our goods.

We will help you with de-industrialization, and our TNCs will happily buy what will left after, and in return we will give you a lot of cheap loans so your economy could crush later, and you were our debtors forever.

We will help you to close down your nuclear power plants, and even compensate you some cost of scrapping it.

We need cheap labour and solution for our demographic problems. Why developing your own industry and infrastructure if you can just work in our already developed countries?

Feel cheated? Do not mind it - one day we will offer you a membership so you could be cool.

Funny, but utterly wrong.

It's the first step, we (Czech Rep,. Poland and others) went through something similar too and now we're much better off economically, socially and politically. Marginalization? Absolutely not. EU offered us memberships and this has provided us with the incentive to do often painful, but necessary reforms, and here we are not: my country is about to assume the rotating presidency of the EU as the first ex-Soviet bloc state.

They way you talk, it's pretty common among Russians. This "you don't like us anymore? You wanna go with your new friends? Yeah, so f*** off and don't come back to us crying when they betray you!" attitude. It only proves how little you understand the countries you once "protected".

Anyway, Russia either provides these countries with a viable alternative to the EU, or it loses. Or it can use military force to trumph the EU, but that would only prove my point.
 
Can I just say that Russians attacking the EU for being too rapaciously greedy and exploitative and generally ruthlessly capitalistic is a fantastic counterpoint to Americans calling it communist? I can? Good.
 
The good card for Russia, is to align itself with US and help restrain the federalization of Europe, to keep/regain Western Europe under US control. However, since Russia hates US more than EU, this card is useless.
 
Anyway, Russia either provides these countries with a viable alternative to the EU, or it loses. Or it can use military force to trumph the EU, but that would only prove my point.
What the point to conquest them? The fall of USSR could be blessing for Russia in a long run. Managing such a big empire as USSR + Warsaw block is too much waste of resources. Of course, if USSR leader were more smart and took Chinese approach we would not have to go through hardships of 90s and economy perils because of broken economy ties inside of former USSR and Warsaw pact coutries but what's done is done. The good thing is that it gave a lesson not to conquest territories blindly just for the sake of it, and not to industrialize, develop infrastructure, teach them how to read and so on for free, just because they are our "Communist brothers". New Russia is pragmatic Russia.

What Russia is really need is economy and military union with Belarus and Kazakhstan (couple of years ealier I would mention Ukraine but this state is going to crash soon, so Russia will just have to pick pieces left after Ukraine's dissolution), maybe a couple of other countries, and maintain decent business relations with Europe and China. That's all what is needed, and Moon is the next step ;).
 
Can I just say that Russians attacking the EU for being too rapaciously greedy and exploitative and generally ruthlessly capitalistic is a fantastic counterpoint to Americans calling it communist? I can? Good.

If it makes you feel better.

I'll just add that each time somebody says "ruthless capitalism", a picture of Russian oligarchs attending a Millionaires Fair while millions of Russians are living in poverty comes to my mind...
 
The good card for Russia, is to align itself with US and help restrain the federalization of Europe, to keep/regain Western Europe under US control. However, since Russia hates US more than EU, this card is useless.
Actually, there is nothing bad in federalization of Europe. EU is magnificient idea though realization sucks (it have not much future in its current form). And US is much more dangerous than EU, even kids knows that.
 
What the point to conquest them? The fall of USSR could be blessing for Russia in a long run. Managing such a big empire as USSR + Warsaw block is too much waste of resources. Of course, if USSR leader were more smart and took Chinese approach we would not have to go through hardships of 90s and economy perils because of broken economy ties inside of former USSR and Warsaw pact coutries but what's done is done. The good thing is that it gave a lesson not to conquest territories blindly just for the sake of it, and not to industrialize, develop infrastructure, teach them how to read and so on for free, just because they are our "Communist brothers". New Russia is pragmatic Russia.

Oh please, stop talking like it was Russia who helped the Warsaw Pact countries. We've been through that many times before - you exploited them as colonies and inhibited their natural development and progress.

"Teach them how to read" :lol: I remember how my grandmother used to tell me about the Russian liberators, who washed hands and faces in water toilets, because they've never seen them before and didn't know what was their purpose :lol: Yeah, and then the story about how they got scared when an alarm clock they had stolen from their house started ringing in one soldier's backpack :lol:

Even to my peasant grandparents back in the 1940s, most Russians looked like hardly literate rednecks, and you're telling me that you brough civilization here? That's just: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Never mind, I don't wanna derail the thread, so consider this a friendly reminder that what you're saying is utterly wrong. You might have a superiority complex with regards to Georgia or Belarus, but hardly in case of any non-Soviet WP members.

What Russia is really need is economy and military union with Belarus and Kazakhstan (couple of years ealier I would mention Ukraine but this state is going to crash soon, so Russia will just have to pick pieces left after Ukraine's dissolution), maybe a couple of other countries, and maintain decent business relations with Europe and China. That's all what is needed, and Moon is the next step ;).

Stop dreaming. Belarus is poor and without natural resources, and Kazakhstan won't be happy to hand over all its natural gas to Russia. The economic strength of such a bloc would be puny compared to the EU + friendly partner countries.

For some reason, all these countries feel that EU offers a better deal than Russia. Why is that? Think about it.
 
Russian response?

Putin warns Ukraine of gas cut if debt is not paid

MOSCOW, December 4 (RIA Novosti) - Russia could reduce natural gas supplies to Ukraine if the country fails to pay its debt on time, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said on Thursday.

"If our partners do not fulfill agreements, we will have to reduce supplies. What else can we do?" Putin said in a live televised question-and-answer session, adding that Moscow would notify European consumers of any such decisions.

Russian energy giant Gazprom last month quoted Ukraine's outstanding debt at $2.4 billion. Some of the funds have reportedly been repaid, but Gazprom has demanded full payment, and threatened supply cuts.

Ukraine transits about 80% of Russia's Europe-bound gas.

The countries have also agreed on a gradual shift to market gas prices. Ukraine currently pays $179.5 per 1,000 cubic meters for gas imported from Russia or via Russian territory.

Gas supplies have been a thorny issue in recent years, triggering bitter rows between the two former Soviet republics. A pricing row between the countries at the start of 2006 led to a brief cut in supplies to Ukraine. Some consumers in Europe reported supply shortfalls during the dispute.
 
With the international market of fuel is falling... Russia? Mother Russia? Can you hear me? Are you cold?
Fear not. Blessfully, not only global financial crisis is happening, but seems like we also passed Peak Oil (the more crises the merrier).
 
If Peak Oil is really passed than supply will start to contract rapidly (about 8-9 % per year), so prices will start to rise again even if demand contracted due to world crisis.
 
Top Bottom