Pavel Chichikov
King
- Joined
- May 26, 2012
- Messages
- 674
Perhaps, although you could argue they were responsible for their own decline by failing to advance and sticking to largely inefficient methods of government and organisation. Stagnation = decline.
Not really. Even at it's worst, the Byzantine Empire was far safer, more stable and better governed than the illiterate Ottoman tribes who conquered them.
Byzantine Empire never had anything like a traditional system where a new ruler murdered all his (possibly close to 100) brothers from what was essentially a glorified brothel. Byzantine Empire didn't build it's shock-troops from enslaved children who later became a corrupt caste of soldiers who refused to fight and murdered any Monarch who tried to modernize the state in the slightest way.
Byzantines 'stagnated' because they were subject to constant raids, piracy, economic blockade, huge mass migrations (goths, huns, slavs, albanians, bulgars, arabs, seljuks, ottomans) and invasions and backstabbings (which is really what destroyed them in the end) from north, south west and east for 1000 years. It's amazing they survived so long and still managed to deeply stamp their identity over most over eastern europe and the largest country in the world. pretty impressive if you ask me.