I assume you're kidding?
Wait, you aren't kidding????
A whole thread about female objectification and we don't even have any pictures of females being objectified?
the pope.
seriously, if i want porn, i get me some porn, i dont pick up a vaguely pornographic crap magazine at my dentists.
You're sitting in a dentist's waiting room for a root-canal. There are two magazines lying on the table in front of you. One has Kim Kardashian, Megan Fox or Rosie Huntington-Whiteley (your choice) on the cover. The other magazine has Milton Friedman, Mr. Charles Windsor, or Pope Benedict XVI on it.
Assuming you're heterosexual with no female significant others present, which magazine do you pick-up first?
You're sitting in a dentist's waiting room for a root-canal. There are two magazines lying on the table in front of you. One has Kim Kardashian, Megan Fox or Rosie Huntington-Whiteley (your choice) on the cover. The other magazine has Milton Friedman, Mr. Charles Windsor, or Pope Benedict XVI on it.
Assuming you're heterosexual with no female significant others present, which magazine do you pick-up first?
So are we just supposed to assume that you're cool with rape, or...?Females can never be objectified "too much".
Why would I want to pick up a magazine featuring some woman who appeared to be manufactured for the purpose of appearing on a magazine? I wouldn't be caught dead "reading" one of those.You're sitting in a dentist's waiting room for a root-canal. There are two magazines lying on the table in front of you. One has Kim Kardashian, Megan Fox or Rosie Huntington-Whiteley (your choice) on the cover. The other magazine has Milton Friedman, Mr. Charles Windsor, or Pope Benedict XVI on it.
Assuming you're heterosexual with no female significant others present, which magazine do you pick-up first?