Because tankies can't mention it without victim-blaming. Case in pointWhy?
Some misguided people tried to start a counter-revolution but made a slight error of about one billion in their estimate of the support they could muster.![]()

Because tankies can't mention it without victim-blaming. Case in pointWhy?
Some misguided people tried to start a counter-revolution but made a slight error of about one billion in their estimate of the support they could muster.![]()
It is indeed a huge disparity.If Chinese citizens really didn't want it, they would throw out the current lot.
As it is though, the national government has about 95% support, while local governments have < 20%.
That level of support, and particularly the huge disparity between national and local, came as a real surprise to Harvard researchers in their 15 year study of recent Chinese politics.
Yes, it surprised me. That level of satisfaction is remarkable, and the researchers seem to have tried the best they could to eliminate biases.It is indeed a huge disparity.
Was this not surprising for you?
And do you think this reflects well on the national government?
Thanks for sharing with us the hidden wisdom that authoritarian governments don't exist because if people didn't want them, they would just rebel.If Chinese citizens really didn't want it, they would throw out the current lot.
Awwww. Did a big bad commie scare you when you were a baby?Thanks for sharing with us the hidden wisdom that authoritarian governments don't exist because if people didn't want them, they would just rebel.
Also evil doesn't exist, because people would just fight it.
If you want to be insulting, at least try to do it with style.Awwww. Did a big bad commie scare you when you were a baby?![]()
One could also say over 80% do have a problem on the level where it matters or where they interact directly.Awwww. Did a big bad commie scare you when you were a baby?
Over 90% don't have a problem with the CCP at the national level, so it's moot anyway.![]()
Who could believe such a thing!!!!!!
Foreign influencers used to whitewash Xinjiang abuses
This report explores how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses foreign social media influencers to shape and push messages domestically and internationally about Xinjiang that are aligned with its own preferred narratives.
Our research has found key instances in which Chinese state entities have supported influencers in the creation of social media content in Xinjiang, as well as amplified influencer content that supports pro-CCP narratives. That content broadly seeks to debunk Western media reporting and academic research, refute statements by foreign governments and counter allegations of widespread human rights abuses in Xinjiang. Often, such content is then promoted by party-state media and diplomatic accounts across major international social media networks and in Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) briefings. This trend is particularly notable given the difficulty faced by journalists reporting in Xinjiang.
Our research also examines how the CCP’s use of foreign influencers presents a growing challenge to global social media platforms, and in particular their efforts to identify and label state-affiliated accounts.
![]()
Click for interactive version
I am not quite sure what you mean, but as I understand it that is derived from publicly available social media posts with freely available software.Get out with that CIA-made image.
No, it's because they've been trying to kill us for the last two years!Awwww. Did a big bad commie scare you when you were a baby?
Really? Even those that want re-unification?No, it's because they've been trying to kill us for the last two years!
Song by none other than Generalissimo Chiang himself!
Who could believe such a thing!!!!!!
Foreign influencers used to whitewash Xinjiang abuses
This report explores how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses foreign social media influencers to shape and push messages domestically and internationally about Xinjiang that are aligned with its own preferred narratives.
Our research has found key instances in which Chinese state entities have supported influencers in the creation of social media content in Xinjiang, as well as amplified influencer content that supports pro-CCP narratives. That content broadly seeks to debunk Western media reporting and academic research, refute statements by foreign governments and counter allegations of widespread human rights abuses in Xinjiang. Often, such content is then promoted by party-state media and diplomatic accounts across major international social media networks and in Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) briefings. This trend is particularly notable given the difficulty faced by journalists reporting in Xinjiang.
Our research also examines how the CCP’s use of foreign influencers presents a growing challenge to global social media platforms, and in particular their efforts to identify and label state-affiliated accounts.
![]()
Click for interactive version
I do it because I really love propaganda wars.If you want to be insulting, at least try to do it with style.
And if you love so much China and their government and despise the West so much, I wonder why you are living in Australia.
Well, maybe because Australia won't jail you because you spit all over its government and culture, while China would. Funny how it works.
And it's got a cool theme song.The amadeus TimesFebruary 24th, 2022amadeus says amadeus is great!
Price: ¥0
amadeus reports that amadeus Times’ journalistic integrity is unmatched and is not a mouthpiece for amadeus.