Gori the Grey
The Poster
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 12,136
Or more precisely, one: a Sri Lankan, an Indian. We are okay with one of your kind (it shows how broad-minded and inclusive we are).Which is: none.
By the way, Coulter's specific way of putting the point is very telling regarding the anxieties that drive the right. They know the demographic trends. They know that by 2050, there will no longer be any majority "we" to make decisions about how many of those others we will let in. This "our core identity is WASP" is a last desperate grasping at straws. It will be increasingly aggressive in proportion to the mounting desperation as that date approaches.
We* need to teach white people some way of being white within a "majority-minority" situation--or more precisely encourage them to pre-imagine how they will handle that (since many would reject any teaching on the matter). One of the key elements of white privilege is not having to think of oneself in racial terms at all. One can regard oneself as the default. But one ramification of that is that individual whites have by and large developed no ways of being just one race in a group that includes people of many different races. If a particular White person's working group included two South Asians, one East Asian, two Middle-Easterners and an African-American, how could that person contribute to the group's workings "the White perspective"? Most White people's minds recoil: there's not one thing that being White means; you can be anything if you're White. Until something fills that conceptual space, the anxieties that drive Coulter's formulation will prevail. Because what most white people presently feel in that space is nothing.
*The "we" here is "people of all races who pre-imagine without anxiety a post-White America"