General Politics Three: But what is left/right?

Status
Not open for further replies.

US Senate passes $95bn package of aid for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan​

The US Senate has approved a long-awaited $95bn (£75.2bn) aid package for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan after months of political wrangling.

While Democrats were in favour of passing the bill, Republicans were divided and previously voted it down.

The package includes $60bn for Kyiv, $14bn for Israel's war against Hamas and $10bn for humanitarian aid in conflict zones, including in Gaza.

Lawmakers voted 70 to 29 to approve the package.

The bill will now go to the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, where its fate remains uncertain.

The measure passed the Senate despite criticism from Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson and former President Donald Trump.

In the end, 22 Republicans voted for the legislation, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

"History settles every account," Mr McConnell said in a statement following the vote. "And today, on the value of American leadership and strength, history will record that the Senate did not blink."

Ukraine's president also said he was "grateful" to senators for passing it.

The vote came after an all-night Senate session during which several Republicans made speeches criticising the measure.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68284380

Looks like nothing about the US border.
The House might not bring it to a vote unless pressure increases on the Speaker somehow.

In related news, the House impeached the Homeland Security Secretary today over the border.


The House of Representatives has voted 214-213 to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for "willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law" in enforcing border policy and "breach public trust." Three Republicans voted with all Democrats against the impeachment.

Mayorkas is the first cabinet member to be impeached since William Belknap, secretary of war under President Ulysses S. Grant, in 1876. It is highly unlikely that he will be convicted in the Senate or removed from office.
 
Which ones? They're not exactly created equal(ha!).
 
Why is it valuable?

Hm - even without the US we would still want to be allied with the others, for us it is particularly important to cooperate with the neighbouring nations, France, Germany, UK and the Netherlands, Denmark.

Belgium is very small, modern artillery shoots straight across it, our F16 pilots can hardly complete their post take-off checks before they reach the border, only way to operate a military here is in some form of multinational alliance.

NATO's primary function is ofcourse to protect the trans-Atlantic trade routes and the Channel.

In more general terms - you either compete or cooperate, it is not practical to compete with all, so you ally with some to compete with others, in this manner you shape and control your surroundings which is ultimately beneficial to the individual.

Alliances have been formed since the beginning of history, it's a force multiplier, cowboys join a posse, criminals join a gang, nations join an alliance :)
 
Last edited:
I mean I get the argument by analogy with labor unions (very clever, but not really accurate given that NATO countries don't pool their resources for defense), but I have no real idea of what you're trying to say. I asked Snowygerry to explain their perspectice on the value of NATO since they said the alliance is valuable.

Well yes, as above, if you mean the value to the US, I'm sure you don't need me to explain that...

Reps and Dems don't agree on anything else but they do agree that US leaving NATO would be a bad idea,

so if you're not leaving, and we're not leaving, I guess we're stuck with eachother :)


Under the provision, a president would be required to notify key committees in both the House and the Senate no later than 180 days before deliberating whether to "suspend, terminate, denounce, or withdraw" from NATO. If a president pressed forward, a withdrawal would require an act of Congress or two-thirds of the senators present to approve of such an action.
(...)

President Joe Biden later signed the overall legislation into law.
 
You act like Nato has two countries, one of which is the US.
Besides, there is no Nato without the US, but certainly plenty of Natos where up to quite a few other countries leave. Even within current Nato the serious or even half-serious armies are few and far between.
 

A nation like Switzerland, with full deployable militia spends, 0.8 of gnp according the table above.

NATO is an incredibly wasteful organisation, on account of the US' useless wars mostly, but also because we buy expensive US weapon systems like the F35 that are rarely delivered in time, and sufficient numbers.

Strictly for self-defence, we'd probably be better off without it.
On reflection, an open-ended commitment to buy endless over inflated weaponry from the US arms sector, scaled directly to economic growth, actually does sound a bit like the protection racket Trump seems to imagine.
 
At moment the bottleneck is not the available funds, but production capacity, even if we ordered an extra 30 F35s or just a single patriot battery they wouldn't be available, worse we would compete with those that might actually need them, the Germans wanted to spend 100 billion iirc, they could only spend 3.
And anyway, Strack-Zimmermann said, €100 billion isn't something that can easily be spent in a year. Manufacturing sophisticated new equipment takes time. The first eight F-35s, for example, are expected to be delivered in 2026 (they will initially stay in the US while Bundeswehr pilots are trained), with the remaining 27 to be delivered by 2029. Some goods, like new digital communication equipment, will be available more quickly, while others will take even longer.

 

Delhi: Farmers face tear gas trying to resume march to India capital​

Indian police have used tear gas for a second day to stop farmers demanding minimum crop prices from marching on the capital Delhi.

Mostly from Punjab state, the farmers are still 200km (125 miles) from Delhi at the Shambhu border in Haryana state.

The capital is ringed by razor wire, cement blocks and fencing on three sides to block their entry.

On Tuesday, Haryana police had fired tear gas after farmers began removing barricades on the way.

Later at night, farm leaders called a "ceasefire" and said they would resume their march in the morning.

Video footage on Wednesday morning showed thousands of riot police and paramilitary troops deployed along Delhi borders to keep the protesters away.

Farmers on the Shambhu border have been distributing protective eyewear to protesters as police deployed tear gas shells to stop their march.

Farm leaders there also held a press conference, alleging that plastic and rubber bullets had been used against them.

They also criticised the media coverage of the protests saying a perception was being created that farmers were "terrorists" or aligned with opposition parties.

"We have nothing to do with anyone else," farm leader Sarwan Singh Pandher told reporters. "Our demands have been the same from the very beginning."

Mr Pandher appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi "to give us a law for MSP".

Minimum support price (MSP) is a guaranteed price that allows farmers to sell most of their produce at government-controlled wholesale markets, or mandis. The farmers are also demanding that the government fulfil its promise of doubling their income.

Farm leaders say at least a dozen farmers have been detained by the police since Tuesday, the day the protest march began after two rounds of talks between farm unions and federal ministers failed to break the deadlock.

More than 200 unions are participating in the march and the farmers aim to reach the capital after crossing the state of Haryana.

On Tuesday, images from the city of Ambala, 200km north of the capital, showed thick clouds of tear gas. At the Shambhu border, clashes broke out between police and protesters as they tried to press past the barricades. Police dropped tear gas on the crowd using drones.

Several protesters were injured in the police action. Security personnel also suffered injuries from stones pelted at them by the protesters.

Traffic jams and disruptions were reported across Delhi as authorities diverted routes and blocked roads.

Earlier, Mr Pandher told ANI news agency that there were approximately 10,000 people at the Shambhu border. Calling the attack on the farmers "shameful", he said, "we are farmers and labourers of the country and we do not want any fight".

Farmers form an influential voting bloc in India and analysts say the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be keen not to alienate them. His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is seeking a third consecutive term in power in general elections this year.

"Our objective is that the government listens to our demands," Mr Pandher had said ahead of the march.

In 2020, protesting farmers had hunkered down for months, blocking national highways that connect the capital to its neighbouring states. Their year-long protest, seen as one of the biggest challenges to Mr Modi's government, forced the authorities to rollback controversial agriculture reforms.

The protesters have received some support from the Punjab and Haryana High Court which has said that as citizens of the country, the farmers had the "right to move freely".

India's opposition leaders have also extended support to them and condemned the government's attempt to stop them from reaching Delhi.

Congress party leaders Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge said on Tuesday that they would enact a law to guarantee minimum price for the farmers if the party was voted to power in the elections.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-68271364
 
At moment the bottleneck is not the available funds, but production capacity, even if we ordered an extra 30 F35s or just a single patriot battery they wouldn't be available, worse we would compete with those that might actually need them, the Germans wanted to spend 100 billion iirc, they could only spend 3.


Wonder what greases production capacity. We'd need less if we didn't pledge our sons for everywhere. Especially nonreciprocal pledges. Like I said, if it won't be paid for in easy times under weird half-promises then it definitely won't be honored when it's hard and costs kids.

Delhi: Farmers face tear gas trying to resume march to India capital​

Indian police have used tear gas for a second day to stop farmers demanding minimum crop prices from marching on the capital Delhi.

Mostly from Punjab state, the farmers are still 200km (125 miles) from Delhi at the Shambhu border in Haryana state.

The capital is ringed by razor wire, cement blocks and fencing on three sides to block their entry.

On Tuesday, Haryana police had fired tear gas after farmers began removing barricades on the way.

Later at night, farm leaders called a "ceasefire" and said they would resume their march in the morning.

Video footage on Wednesday morning showed thousands of riot police and paramilitary troops deployed along Delhi borders to keep the protesters away.

Farmers on the Shambhu border have been distributing protective eyewear to protesters as police deployed tear gas shells to stop their march.

Farm leaders there also held a press conference, alleging that plastic and rubber bullets had been used against them.

They also criticised the media coverage of the protests saying a perception was being created that farmers were "terrorists" or aligned with opposition parties.

"We have nothing to do with anyone else," farm leader Sarwan Singh Pandher told reporters. "Our demands have been the same from the very beginning."

Mr Pandher appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi "to give us a law for MSP".

Minimum support price (MSP) is a guaranteed price that allows farmers to sell most of their produce at government-controlled wholesale markets, or mandis. The farmers are also demanding that the government fulfil its promise of doubling their income.

Farm leaders say at least a dozen farmers have been detained by the police since Tuesday, the day the protest march began after two rounds of talks between farm unions and federal ministers failed to break the deadlock.

More than 200 unions are participating in the march and the farmers aim to reach the capital after crossing the state of Haryana.

On Tuesday, images from the city of Ambala, 200km north of the capital, showed thick clouds of tear gas. At the Shambhu border, clashes broke out between police and protesters as they tried to press past the barricades. Police dropped tear gas on the crowd using drones.

Several protesters were injured in the police action. Security personnel also suffered injuries from stones pelted at them by the protesters.

Traffic jams and disruptions were reported across Delhi as authorities diverted routes and blocked roads.

Earlier, Mr Pandher told ANI news agency that there were approximately 10,000 people at the Shambhu border. Calling the attack on the farmers "shameful", he said, "we are farmers and labourers of the country and we do not want any fight".

Farmers form an influential voting bloc in India and analysts say the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be keen not to alienate them. His Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is seeking a third consecutive term in power in general elections this year.

"Our objective is that the government listens to our demands," Mr Pandher had said ahead of the march.

In 2020, protesting farmers had hunkered down for months, blocking national highways that connect the capital to its neighbouring states. Their year-long protest, seen as one of the biggest challenges to Mr Modi's government, forced the authorities to rollback controversial agriculture reforms.

The protesters have received some support from the Punjab and Haryana High Court which has said that as citizens of the country, the farmers had the "right to move freely".

India's opposition leaders have also extended support to them and condemned the government's attempt to stop them from reaching Delhi.

Congress party leaders Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge said on Tuesday that they would enact a law to guarantee minimum price for the farmers if the party was voted to power in the elections.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-68271364
The markets have been cruddy.
 
Last edited:
Tasmanian election called a year early, for March 23. This is mostly notable because if Labor win, it will eliminate the last Liberal Party government in the country, leaving nine Labor governments federally and in the states and territories. That'll mean the mayor of Brisbane is then pretty much their most powerful elected government member.

The trigger was, loosely, members quitting the government over a controversial plan to build a new stadium in order to meet prerequisites to get Tasmania granted a professional football team.
 
Wonder what greases production capacity. We'd need less if we didn't pledge our sons for everywhere. Especially nonreciprocal pledges. Like I said, if it won't be paid for in easy times under weird half-promises then it definitely won't be honored when it's hard and costs kids.


The markets have been cruddy.

Well for sure throwing money at our army will not increase your production capability, much wiser is investing in our own production, which might as well be in the US.


FN Herstal, the defence and security branch of the Herstal Group, is based near Liège but also has three fully owned subsidiaries: FN America, FNH UK and Noptel, which is based in Finland.
 
It would seem logistically wise to have it spread around. But it still has to be there.
 
And at scale.
 
@Farm Boy curious to hear your thoughts on this interview
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom