EnglishEdward
Deity
Public expenditure as a proportion of GDP.
That is one of the 2.Public expenditure as a proportion of GDP.
I am fairly sure that is included in public expenditure, so no.State or Canton expenditure as a portion of GDP
A little bit more specific.Well... public and private (investor etc) expenditure?
No. More the what rather than the who.Public and George Soros investments![]()
No. Here is the leader table of just that:Infrastructure investments?
> data.frame(tail(world_tmp[order(world_tmp$second_value),c("name","value","second_value")], n = 10))[c(1,3)]
name second_value
8 Argentina 3.965538
105 Israel 3.976223
225 Uruguay 4.017336
161 Netherlands 4.333051
15 Australia 4.394454
40 Chile 4.580939
178 Paraguay 4.965759
32 Brazil 5.414530
226 United States 10.564632
39 Switzerland 15.787526
> data.frame(head(world_tmp[order(world_tmp$second_value),c("name","value","second_value")], n = 10))[c(1,3)]
name second_value
220 Turkey 0.8394288
112 Kazakhstan 0.9327844
130 Luxembourg 0.9875326
29 Belize 1.0207242
56 Czech Rep. 1.0372586
51 Cuba 1.1097835
203 Slovakia 1.1357899
153 Malaysia 1.2257552
107 Jamaica 1.3690158
206 Swaziland 1.3735291
No. That would basically be Government expenditure - Deficit? This is a value that makes a lot of sense to add to Government expenditure to get a value that is comparable around the world.Taxes?
No. I was not being that easy.Deficit?
You win. The second value is % GDP spent on private healthcare.Or it may be healthcare system expenditures. I know we spend a lot of money there as well, fortunately we get some quality care in return, whereas the American one is just expensive, without the benefits. ;-)