Duke of Britain
Emperor
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 1,600
Probably, but nothing is impossible.
And nobody could've controlled it anyway, and rightly, nobody even tried.So i am wrong? do you think the powers of Europe would allow say, the UK, that already owned India, to (try to) colonize China?
China was rich and populous, controlling it would mean a lot, resources and a market.
And nobody could've controlled it anyway, and rightly, nobody even tried.
Realistically, the closest any European state came to controlling China was actually Russia, which was an ace away from it from about 1850 to 1905. And nobody was working to block Russia.
Just out of curiosity : Why not? I'd guess not nationalism, considering that the Manchu ruling class was not chinese, but...
Probably something about the "mandate of heaven" thing?
I do agree that it was a very hard country to conquer/control, that's why the europeans tried to get economic concessions instead of land.
When exactly will Magna Mundi for DW come out?
It didn't have a lot of options and under the circumstances they managed the best that could reasonably have been expected of them.
The mere act of modernization destroyed the legitimacy of the state, though. Shame.
I was in the middle of a 15 year regency counsel when Milan DoW meThese our old screen shots as i now own all of southern Italy.
How long do the resisting westernisation events go on for?Spoiler :![]()
![]()
How long do the resisting westernisation events go on for?
That's a big Bohemia. Also, what is TEAM ATTACK!? And is that Scotland or Castille in Britain and Brittany?
How to fully westernise?Until you fully westernize, not like these events are a problem tough, -2 RR![]()
How to fully westernise?
ULM! praise him!I was in the middle of a 15 year regency counsel when Milan DoW meThese our old screen shots as i now own all of southern Italy.
How long do the resisting westernisation events go on for?Spoiler :![]()
![]()
Modernize the army, until around tech 28 or so it isn't worth to do it as Ottomans.
ULM! praise him!
He was right for the wrong reasons. The Qing Empire's social/economic/political system was not perfect - but if it had been changed (you know, just like how it was changed) the Qing Empire would not have survived. Is it reasonable to have demanded steps from these men that would have precipitated the destruction of their state? It's like berating Austrian politicians for failing to confront the Magyars with the only thing that they would respond to: military force...as though the prospect of civil war in and of itself wouldn't have destroyed the Habsburg monarchy anyway.Even if you just focused on the reform-minded Chinese officials, they didn't go far enough in their own principled thinking, much less their practical action. Feng Kuei-Fen felt it was only necessary to adapt European firearms and nothing else, believing the social/economic/political system of China was perfect. And he wasn't the only one.