wait a second, we're going to get judged for allowing SSM, when we're already allowing murder?
I agree, the US should abolish the death penalty and properly sanction berserker police officers.
wait a second, we're going to get judged for allowing SSM, when we're already allowing murder?
I would do the time-honored Canadian thing: First, I'd pour the soda over his head. Then I'd smush a pie in his face.Would you go to a bar and have a glass of soda with Romney?
Obama removed the Churchill bust from the WH oval office. Thats quite contemptible.
Perhaps Obama didn't want an overweight Brit bearing a resemblence to a maladjusted toad staring at him every day.Obama removed the Churchill bust from the WH oval office. Thats quite contemptible.
Why do you keep harping on something that you know with certainty did not happen?
Perhaps Obama didn't want an overweight Brit bearing a resemblence to a maladjusted toad staring at him every day.
Obama removed the Churchill bust from the oval office. A few years later Obama showed DC around the White House and pointed out a DIFFERENT bust in a unimportant part of the white House. Hillariously the WH claimed that no bust was returned to the embassy and provided evidence of this second burst to prove it; basically the white house is full of liars. It was then, the British embassy pointed out that Obama HAD returned the oval office burst at the start of his term.
Only because he didn't remove it via the window.Obama removed the Churchill bust from the WH oval office. Thats quite contemptible.
Honestly dude? Are you that blind or stupid? You said the same thing in another thread and i disproved it.
Obama removed the Churchill bust from the oval office. A few years later Obama showed DC around the White House and pointed out a DIFFERENT bust in a unimportant part of the white House. Hillariously the WH claimed that no bust was returned to the embassy and provided evidence of this second burst to prove it; basically the white house is full of liars. It was then, the British embassy pointed out that Obama HAD returned the oval office burst at the start of his term.
So to recap:
1) Obama removes bust,
2) Obama claims he never did it and cites the other bust,
3) British embassy soundly disproves that,
4) White House look like a bunch of incompetant liars.
So did he remove the churchill bust from the oval office? The answer is a resounding yes.
What damage? We back you over the Falklands, the 'special relation' is still intact, we haven't invaded any countries in the Commonwealth. We didn't drag you into two of our wars though.As I said before and before you blow a gasket - it's a symbol of the damage done to British interests by Obama.
If it's just a symbol, then why is it "contemptible"?
What damage? We back you over the Falklands, the 'special relation' is still intact, we haven't invaded any countries in the Commonwealth. We didn't drag you into two of our wars though.
If the Churchill bust such a big deal why isn't Romney using it against Obama? Who do Brits like more? Obama or the guy who insulted them about the Olympics?
How so? Isn't it more likely that he simply didn't think that many Britons would find the action offensive- which, given that the only Britons who seem to have noticed are you and the staff of the Daily Telegraph, seems to be the case?It demonstrates how much importance he places on British relations and that manifests in his actions with these little things and foreign policy.
No idea, I'm just one Briton's POV. Most of the public won't care, those who do will drool over Obama because how cool, black, trendy and handsome he is. At least my reasoning isn't spurious![]()