IBM's Watson on Jeopardy.

There are a few other things to be said, such as how poorly Trebek treats his contestants (although that one is sort of par for the course for game shows) and how liberally he makes judgments taking away or awarding players points after the fact.
I thought there was a panel of judges deciding those things, and Trebek just announces it.
 
There is don't let that get in the way of Japanrocks getting high and mighty though.
 
A little OT, but my English teacher's son recently won on Jeopardy.
 
Well it makes you have to answer quickly, it's a different beast.

I've dominated my share of trivia nights at drinking establishments ;)

No, you are penalized for interrupting the question to answer. You're forced into a stupid buzzer race at the end.
 
No, you are penalized for interrupting the question to answer. You're forced into a stupid buzzer race at the end.

What? I wasn't aware that it was possible to interrupt Trebek's questioning.
 
If you buzz before he finishes, I think your buzzer locks out for a short time.
 
Well that makes it much less impressive. I don't think it comprehends language either, it could do something like this:

Trebek: "This city was founded by dutch colonists and referred to as the big apple."

The computer does a Google-type of search for key words. "This city was founded by dutch colonists and referred to as the big apple."

Watson: ...New York City.

That's probably an easy example, but it would be "brute force speed," as Classical Hero said, and not actual comprehension.

61107344.png

Yeah that is what I meant. It can do massive amounts of calculations to get the right result, but it will not understand exactly what it is doing.

I would love to see a Celebrity version of that show on SNL. I am sure there is plenty of humour to be had with this.
 
All the annoying people saying "omg you can just google the answers lolz", you do realise that Google has a highly sophisticated algorithm for "understanding" questions too, right? One that depends on a global network of thousands of supercomputers, each containing thousands of cores, and multi-million dollar datacentres all across the globe? A database and processing network larger than anything ever created by mankind?

How big is Watson again...?

Sure, a lot of Google's capacity is required for the billions of requests it services all day, every day, globally. But the database required to hold all of that information, and the processing power and data structures required to interrogate that databse, is unfathomably immense.

The whole point of Watson's AI is to create a reasonably sized system that doesn't need a huge amount of processing power or data to understand and respond to basic human-language questions. That's the challenge.
 
Lemme know when Watson can start engaging in debates here on CFC :lol:

But really, this is impressive. Just don't let him become self-aware. I haven't let any of my appliances watch Jeopardy for fear they might get ideas.
 
reasonably sized? Don't get me wrong, I think this is impressive. But I think this is backwards technology. It was long ago realized you can't put that much computing power into one machine. This thing reminds me of the huge gigantic supercomputers of the 50's (though it is much more capable). The internet is much more capable and reliable. This is mostly just a gimmick.

The only practical application is AI, but as I said, it can't be fit into a reasonably sized machine (ie: a robot/android), and until it can, it's usefulness is very limited. If we ever do develop any kind of android/robot technology, it will probably be necessary for it to connect to some kind of network system. Although that increases the likelihood it can be hacked. Rise of the machines. :) A stand alone unit is much more secure, but until we develop machines that can do what Watson does into the size of a human brain, that isn't realistic.
 
...But I think this is backwards technology...This is mostly just a gimmick...
It is nothing of the sort. You just apparently don't understand what the real challenges were.

ibm_watson_team.jpg


IBM Watson Algorithm Team

The only practical application is AI...
There are a multitude of applications for these algorithms. For instance, call centers can use Watson to help find answers to problems. Doctors can use Watson to help them in diagnosing patients. Or the US intelligence apparatus can use thousands of Watsons to help sift through all the internet traffic in the US looking for "terrorists" and other supposed threats.

Not to mention merely developing these algorithms likely led to advances in all sorts of fields, such as natural language, computer architecture, semantic analysis, etc, etc.
 
I'd like to see evidence Watson truly understands the context of what's being said, rather than just having a good search engine and large database.
 
The way a lot of jeopardy questions are asked just doing a straight up search won't work. Sure, the real answer will be on the first page somewhere, maybe, but Watson usually had the right answer at the top of his list. That's the impressive part.
 
I'd like to see evidence Watson truly understands the context of what's being said, rather than just having a good search engine and large database.
I'd like to see evidence that you understand the context of what's being said.
 
From here

A System Designed for Answers
A computer system that can understand natural language and deliver a single, precise answer to a question

Mise, is that an insult, a challenge, or philosophical nonsense? :)
 
Watson can spit out points somewhat related to the topic at hand but struggles with context? My guess is that Watson has been posting here for a while.
 
Back
Top Bottom