Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
They're the ones trying to start a war with Iran, so it's probably going to come up at some point.I'm not interested in discussing right-wingers or their values here, sorry.
They're the ones trying to start a war with Iran, so it's probably going to come up at some point.I'm not interested in discussing right-wingers or their values here, sorry.
Conservatives believe in natural hierarchy. The belief in natural hierarchies is what constitutes conservatism as an ideological perspective, as a political tradition. Without this belief, "conservatism" is nothing but a cluster of mindless prejudices, a reflexive prejudice for the familiar, devoid of any historical perspective. And say what you like about Hungtington, I would not deny that he had a very strong sense of historical perspective.
I would challenge you to name one "conservative ideal and value" that isn't fundamentally about defending either some specific hierarchy, or the principle of hierarchy itself.
Except Huntington explicitly argues against western intervention (imperialism) throughout the essay.
I genuinely don't think that what I'm saying is very contentious.You've slipped into being full of yourself.
I genuinely don't think that what I'm saying is very contentious.
On the contrary, the whole point of the essay was how to avoid a major inter-civilizational conflict. He believed tension between some blocks (not all) was inevitable, but an actual major conflict was not only avoidable but also something that should be avoided. He stated that respect, understanding and cooperation between the different Civilizations was the only path to peace in the post Cold War world.It has been a while but that was not the idea I got at the some, and retain now, from reading his book. He did argue that there were different cultural blocs, but his tone struck me as one that assumed confrontation between the blocs was inevitable and should be prepared for. Which necessarily becomes a self-fulfilling concern: one arms against the others, one then has to make use of those arms...
Not that I disagree with the idea that there are different cultural blocs. I only disagree with the idea that hostility should be assumed and confrontation becomes inevitable.
I don't know what this means.Then I challenge you to think of a conservative value that isn't fundamentally about defending a hierarchy. Or, more realize that the same game could literally be played with any value.
When looking at Pelosi i.e., there are imperialistic rogues on the blue side as well.
I wonder how many more applaud Trump on that when nobody is looking (or in some cases, even when they are looking).
So business as usual then?
It is very contentious. And he knows it.Then I challenge you to think of a conservative value that isn't fundamentally about defending a hierarchy. Or, more realize that the same game could literally be played with any value.
We did flip from 'rightwing' to 'conservative' in the conversation. "Conservatives have no values" is certainly not contentious.
Anyway one pillar of conservatism is that there is no universal recipe valid for all time periods and all cultures
I don't see why Russia can't touch them. If NATO is what you are referring to, I'm not so sure the alliance will stand up for Turkey given all the bridges Erdo has been burning. So if Russia decides to step in, there is a good chance Turkey will have to take them on alone and that doesn't end well for Turkey.
A lot?Wow! Which conservative believes this then? And why is it that the idiotic and deluded have nonetheless inherited the leadership of conservatism?
A lot?
I was feeling lazy, and I'm neither much of a conservative nor a philosopher, so I actually copied and pasted that line from noted conservative philosopher Roger Scruton. So he believes in that, for one.
And I said conservatism is not necessarily idiotic nor delusional. Burke was a conservative, arguably he created tye tradition of British conservatism, and he was neither. That doesn't mean that there aren't deluded idiots who call themselves conservative, rightly or wrongly.
And for what it's worth, the leadership of far-left parties and movements, the kind Traitorfish approves, is entirely made up of delusional idiots.
Well he moved towards conservatism and fear of populism and mob rule after witnessing the horrors of the French Revolution. Quite sensible, really.Burke was a liberal before he was a conservative.
His earlier liberal writings supporting better treatment of the American colonies and in support of Irish emancipation are more palatable than his later writings around the time of the French revolution when he showed a deep contempt for the masses.
I don't think that's true, unless you believe the majority of people are delusional idiots.If the majority of people who call themselves conservative are deluded idiots, isn't it fair to call conservatism idiotic and delusional? Maybe I'm just tired posting this early, but isn't an answer of 'no' just a no true scotsman?