I'm in Sweden. We don't do the Euro-thing either. Had a referendum and all. If there's someplace in the EU that resembles the UK in surprising ways, it's Sweden.
Not anymore

I'm in Sweden. We don't do the Euro-thing either. Had a referendum and all. If there's someplace in the EU that resembles the UK in surprising ways, it's Sweden.

I'm in Sweden. We don't do the Euro-thing either.
Actually still, for yet a while.Not anymore![]()
![]()
Actually still, for yet a while.
A difference between Sweden and the UK is the old adagio of the EU being made up of two kinds of small countries — the ones that have realized it, and the ones that yet have to do so.
But when "myopia" is no longer present, everyone will clearly lose sight of what the EU actually does, ditch the common market and strike out into the brave new world of near-autarchic-national-protectionism. Greece is already there, is it not?
Enter 2004 (mass expansion with client microstates and others)
Already addressed by others.Even after the "Thatcher" rebate, the UK remained (after Germany) the second biggest net contributor to the EEC/EC/European Union.
Even then we still paid more than France in most years because the financial shenigans of the city of London inflated GDP
and the UK has much less land than France so the UK benefited less from CAP payments. Now I have never advocated
Leaving because of that net contribution, but I do get a little tired of all this grumbling about the UK's special deal.
What history am I ignoring? Are you going to claim that what is now India wanted to be a part of the British Empire?EnglishEdward said:The role of force in that is greatly over estimated. Suggest you look at respective population figures and death rates experienced by British from native diseases.
Anyway that is greed motivated capitalism, in the form of the East India Company, for you. Point is that the Indians wanted self determination and they got it.
I could have used other examples such as US colonies, Ireland or the break up of Czeckoslovakia but it wouldn't matter to those determined to ignore history.
England and Wales is one single entity.EnglishEdward said:You are wrong.
Wales voted to leave the European Union and by a larger margin than England.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36612308
854,572 (52.5%) voters in Wales chose to leave the EU, compared with 772,347 (47.5%) supporting Remain.
You even have a neighbour with a blue and white flag with a cross on it that professes to hate your guts, drinks a lot and sometimes admits to speaking your language.I'm in Sweden. We don't do the Euro-thing either. Had a referendum and all. If there's someplace in the EU that resembles the UK in surprising ways, it's Sweden.
Isn't that what the common market was, anyway, barring the tax rebates imposed on a helpless Britain by the EU during Thatcher's tenure?
Yes, just imagine if Sweden would remain in one piece if it was forced through the crap we have been subjected to.
Not to mention some lands closer to Weimar.
Regardless of your ninjutsu-based edit, the question remains: cui bono?I have to agree that the expansion of the EU into the Balkans was a huge mistake.
Regardless of your ninjutsu-based edit, the question remains: cui bono?
So the entity created to prevent any further disasters such as those caused mainly by France and Germany trying to gain ascendancy over one another is almost fatally weakened by… the struggle between France and Germany trying to gain ascendancy over one another. XD
Well, according an ICM poll for the Guardian, it appears we Brits are pretty much behind Mrs May’s stance on the EU negotiations.
And not many want a second referendum.
From The Guardian news feed: