Formaldehyde
Both Fair And Balanced
The Daily Show recently had a segment about how right wing Russia is.
They have a 13% flat tax, no deficit, and the highest level of wealth disparity in the world. They prefer Christian immigrants to Muslims and “in just 25 years they figured out the free market and institutionalized xenophobia”. Some of them even complain about "feminist power" due to having so many female legislators under Soviet rule. They have employers who force their employees to attend their own private bible studies. They can even fire them if they don't believe in Jesus, if they are adulterers, had a baby out of wedlock, or even had an abortion. There are even companies with the own private churches. Then there is the matter of same sex marriage and the vilification of homosexuals...
Even Pat Buchanan seems convinced that Putin is a paleoconservative like him:
They have a 13% flat tax, no deficit, and the highest level of wealth disparity in the world. They prefer Christian immigrants to Muslims and “in just 25 years they figured out the free market and institutionalized xenophobia”. Some of them even complain about "feminist power" due to having so many female legislators under Soviet rule. They have employers who force their employees to attend their own private bible studies. They can even fire them if they don't believe in Jesus, if they are adulterers, had a baby out of wedlock, or even had an abortion. There are even companies with the own private churches. Then there is the matter of same sex marriage and the vilification of homosexuals...
Even Pat Buchanan seems convinced that Putin is a paleoconservative like him:
Is Vladimir Putin a paleoconservative?
In the culture war for mankind’s future, is he one of us?
While such a question may be blasphemous in Western circles, consider the content of the Russian president’s state of the nation address.
With America clearly in mind, Putin declared, “In many countries today, moral and ethical norms are being reconsidered.”
“They’re now requiring not only the proper acknowledgment of freedom of conscience, political views and private life, but also the mandatory acknowledgment of the equality of good and evil.”
Translation: While privacy and freedom of thought, religion and speech are cherished rights, to equate traditional marriage and same-sex marriage is to equate good with evil.
No moral confusion here, this is moral clarity, agree or disagree.
President Reagan once called the old Soviet Empire “the focus of evil in the modern world.” President Putin is implying that Barack Obama’s America may deserve the title in the 21st century.
Nor is he without an argument when we reflect on America’s embrace of abortion on demand, homosexual marriage, pornography, promiscuity, and the whole panoply of Hollywood values.
Our grandparents would not recognize the America in which we live.
Moreover, Putin asserts, the new immorality has been imposed undemocratically.
The “destruction of traditional values” in these countries, he said, comes “from the top” and is “inherently undemocratic because it is based on abstract ideas and runs counter to the will of the majority of people.”
Does he not have a point?
Unelected justices declared abortion and homosexual acts to be constitutionally protected rights. Judges have been the driving force behind the imposition of same-sex marriage. Attorney General Eric Holder refused to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act.
America was de-Christianized in the second half of the 20th century by court orders, over the vehement objections of a huge majority of a country that was overwhelmingly Christian.
And same-sex marriage is indeed an “abstract” idea unrooted in the history or tradition of the West. Where did it come from?
Peoples all over the world, claims Putin, are supporting Russia’s “defense of traditional values” against a “so-called tolerance” that is “genderless and infertile.”
Do you think there is any basis to this comparison?Putin says his mother had him secretly baptized as a baby and professes to be a Christian. And what he is talking about here is ambitious, even audacious.
He is seeking to redefine the “Us vs. Them” world conflict of the future as one in which conservatives, traditionalists and nationalists of all continents and countries stand up against the cultural and ideological imperialism of what he sees as a decadent west.
“We do not infringe on anyone’s interests,” said Putin, “or try to teach anyone how to live.” The adversary he has identified is not the America we grew up in, but the America we live in, which Putin sees as pagan and wildly progressive.