It's 9/11 again

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd be far more interested in exploring this subject than talking about the World Trade Center again. In before the conspiracy theories!

EDIT: This seems like a Tavern thread.
 
Yes, let us talk about a puppet leader propped up by the Soviet Union during the height of the Cold War in the New World. From the OPs link...

Soviet role

Material based on reports from the Mitrokhin Archive, the KGB said of Allende that "he was made to understand the necessity of reorganising Chile's army and intelligence services, and of setting up a relationship between Chile's and the USSR's intelligence services". It is also claimed that Allende was given $30,000 "in order to solidify the trusted relations" with him. According to Vasili Mitrokhin, a former KGB major and senior archivist in the KGB intelligence central KGB office in the Yasenevo area of Moscow, Allende made a personal request for Soviet money through his personal contact, KGB officer Svyatoslav Kuznetsov (codenamed LEONID), who urgently came to Chile from Mexico City to help Allende. The original allocation of money for these elections through the KGB was $400,000, a personal subsidy of $50,000 was sent directly to Allende, with an additional $100,000 funneled through funds provided to the Chilean Communist Party.

Historian Christopher Andrew, argued that help from the KGB was a decisive factor, because Allende won by a narrow margin of 39,000 votes of a total of the 3 million cast. After the elections, the KGB director Yuri Andropov obtained permission for additional money and other resources from the Central Committee of the CPSU to ensure an Allende victory in Congress. In his request on 24 October, he stated that the KGB "will carry out measures designed to promote the consolidation of Allende's victory and his election to the post of President of the country". In his KGB file, Allende was reported to have "stated his willingness to co-operate on a confidential basis and provide any necessary assistance, since he considered himself a friend of the Soviet Union". He willingly shared political information.

Andrew writes that regular Soviet contact with Allende after his election was maintained by his KGB case officer, Svyatoslav Kuznetsov, who was instructed by KGB's the 'Centre' to "exert a favorable influence on Chilean government policy". Allende was said to have reacted "positively."

Political and moral support came mostly through the Communist Party and unions. For instance, he received the Lenin Peace Prize from the Soviet Union in 1972. However, there were some fundamental differences between Allende and Soviet political analysts who believed that some violence – or measures that those analysts "theoretically considered to be just" – should have been used. According to Andrew's account of the Mitrokhin archives, "In the KGB's view, Allende's fundamental error was his unwillingness to use force against his opponents. Without establishing complete control over all the machinery of the State, his hold on power could not be secure."

Declarations from KGB General Nikolai Leonov, former Deputy Chief of the First Chief Directorate of the KGB, confirmed that the Soviet Union supported Allende's government economically, politically and militarily. Leonov stated in an interview at the Chilean Center of Public Studies (CEP) that the Soviet economic support included over $100 million in credit, three fishing ships (that distributed 17,000 tons of frozen fish to the population), factories (as help after the 1971 earthquake), 3,100 tractors, 74,000 tons of wheat and more than a million tins of condensed milk.

In mid-1973 the USSR had approved the delivery of weapons (artillery, tanks) to the Chilean Army. However, when news of an attempt from the Army to depose Allende through a coup d'état reached Soviet officials, the shipment was redirected to another country.
 
So, better the military jackboot than a democratic election?
 
The military jackboot, of course, being unofficially supported by the US Government. In many ways, this was a typical proxy conflict between the Soviet Union and United States, and much less about silly ideas like self-rule and democratic governance.
 
So, better the military jackboot than a democratic election?

Well compare it to your opinion if Golden Dawn was elected, would the military jackboot be ok then?
 
I'd take an accountable, democratic government, even one whose leader I disagreed with, over a dictatorship any day.
 
Well compare it to your opinion if Golden Dawn was elected, would the military jackboot be ok then?
I'm failing to see the relation to the Golden Dawn. Allende, for all his flaws, was a democraticaly elected president who managed to completely alienate an important part of his coalition and had the unfortunate luck to be president when world copper prices took a nosedive. Pinochet, on the other hand, was a brutal dictator whose economic policies only showed some effectiveness once world copper prices rose to their previous level.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom