Martial Law in South Korea!

The "with military support" is perhaps the most surprising part. I mean, if I'm a general and I get the call that the president has just declared martial law completely out of the blue, I suppose technically you're obligated to comply but I'd have expected some consultation between generals and delaying actions to see if Parliament was going to suspend it (as they did a couple of hours later after hopping some fences), but clearly at least one commander jumped into action and had their troops occupy Parliament.

I'm not sure I'd be too concerned with the privates who were part of that action and got swept up in it, but I'd definitely want to investigate why there were choppers and who went along with that and ordered the troops to be sent in.
 

Military says martial law will be maintained until lifted by president​

The South Korean military says it will maintain martial law until it is lifted by President Yoon Suk Yeol, despite the nation's parliament voting to block its enforcement, according to the country's national broadcaster.

It follows clashes between protesters and the security forces who tried to barricade the National Assembly.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn38321180et

Moderator Action: Split, as requested, from General thread by Birdjaguar

Does the south korean military do any move without US approval?
The US current ambassador in SK was about to retire and has an interesting story, having been kicked out of Bolivia by Morales in 2008 for plotting a coup, and nearly kicked out of the Philippines dy Duterte for the same reason.
Notably, this ambassador so often fond of plotting with the opposition where he had been posted remained silent until after it was obvious that the coup attempt had failed.

Make of all this what you will. I think the south koreans know how their country has been run. They may decide to change that quicker now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pob

Military says martial law will be maintained until lifted by president​

The South Korean military says it will maintain martial law until it is lifted by President Yoon Suk Yeol, despite the nation's parliament voting to block its enforcement, according to the country's national broadcaster.

It follows clashes between protesters and the security forces who tried to barricade the National Assembly.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn38321180et

Moderator Action: Split, as requested, from General thread by Birdjaguar

Wait, the short-lived martial law isn't over yet?

If the military ignores the vote on martial law being lifted, what if they ignore an impeachment vote too?
 
The "with military support" is perhaps the most surprising part. I mean, if I'm a general and I get the call that the president has just declared martial law completely out of the blue, I suppose technically you're obligated to comply but I'd have expected some consultation between generals and delaying actions to see if Parliament was going to suspend it (as they did a couple of hours later after hopping some fences), but clearly at least one commander jumped into action and had their troops occupy Parliament.
It seems that actually, what happened is rather close than what your initial take is : the military (at least the grunts) followed order to the letter but without a lot of motivation - for example they prevented people entering fromt he front, but didn't bother to deploy enough to prevent people jumping over fences.
There is definitely heads to hunt though, because the President order to block the Assembly is not constitutional - considering that the Assembly has the power to lift the martial law by a vote. The officers who gave these orders should definitely be in hot water.
And the ones to target the most would be the higher-up who refused to back down once the vote had been passed - they might argue that they were following the letter of the law because it appears that it's the President who lifts the martial law situation after the vote forces him to do it, but that feel like a pretty flimsy excuse, especially if they are the same ones who obeyed the illegal order to block the Assembly.
 
There is to my mind a subtle distinction in law between preventing protestors from entering and preventing assembly members from entering the assembly buildings.
 
Yeah, well, the whole problem is that the army was ordered to prevent the REPRESENTATIVES to enter the Assembly...
 

South Korea president expected to face impeachment vote Saturday for martial law push​

Police also investigating claims of treason against President Yoon Suk Yeol, top ministers

South Korean opposition lawmakers said on Thursday they would vote this weekend to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol for his botched attempt to impose martial law, and police said they were investigating claims of treason against him and top ministers.

Yoon's declaration of martial law late on Tuesday sought to consolidate power, ban political activity and censor the media, a move that sparked outrage in the streets and concern among South Korea's international allies.

Fighting for his political future, Yoon accepted the resignation of Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun on Thursday and nominated his ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Choi Byung-hyuk, as a replacement.

Lawmakers of the opposition Democratic Party planned to seek a vote in parliament to impeach Yoon at about 7 p.m. ET on Saturday, a party spokesperson told reporters.

"The Yoon Suk Yeol regime's declaration of emergency martial law caused great confusion and fear among our people," Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Seung-won told the National Assembly earlier.

Yoon's ruling People Power Party is divided over the crisis but said it would oppose impeachment, with the party in turmoil and two years left in Yoon's five-year term.

The Democratic Party needs at least eight of the 108 ruling-party lawmakers to back the bill for it to pass with a two-thirds majority in the 300-seat parliament.

If the impeachment bill passes, South Korea's Constitutional Court would then decide whether to uphold the motion — a process that could take up to 180 days.

If Yoon were to be suspended from exercising power, Prime Minister Han Duck-soo would fill in as leader.

If Yoon resigned or was removed from office, a new election would be held within 60 days.

No live bullets given, official says​

Defence minister Kim had recommended Yoon declare martial law on Tuesday, according to the interior minister, a senior military official and the opposition's filing to impeach Yoon.

Kim also ordered the deployment of troops to the parliament, Vice-Defence Minister Kim Seon-ho said.

South Korea's army chief has also offered to resign, the Yonhap news agency said.

The chief of investigations for the national police confirmed to a parliamentary hearing that the force was investigating accusations of treason and other related crimes over the declaration of martial law. The complaint was filed by an opposition party and activists.

The probe includes Yoon, his interior minister, and the ousted defence minister.

The former defence minister faces a travel ban while the investigations progress, broadcaster YTN said.

The impeachment plan follows a night of chaos after Yoon declared martial law and armed troops attempted to force their way into the National Assembly building in Seoul, only to stand back when parliamentary aides sprayed them with fire extinguishers.

The commander of the martial law troops said he had no intention of wielding firearms against the public, and Kim, the vice-defence minister, said no live ammunition had been provided to those troops.

"The people and the aides who protected parliament protected us with their bodies. The people won, and it's now time for us to protect the people," the Democratic Party's Kim said.

Many protesters said they feared a return to the dictatorships and martial law that marked much of South Korea's post-war period.

"For the sake of my children, this must be stopped no matter what," one protester, Kim Hye-Min, said on Thursday at a demonstration outside parliament. "We cannot go back to the 1970s."

The crisis rattled global financial markets and South Korea's benchmark KOSPI index.

U.S., Japan taken by surprise​

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Japan's "security situation may be fundamentally changed" in light of the instability in Seoul and North Korea's rising military assertiveness.

"What will happen to South Korea? There appears to be a great deal of domestic criticism and opposition," he told parliament, adding that Yoon's efforts to improve relations with Tokyo "must never be undermined."

There has been no reaction yet from North Korea to the drama in the South.

On Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken told Reuters the U.S. had not been made aware in advance of Yoon's declaration. The U.S. has 28,500 troops stationed in South Korea as a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War.

The commander of U.S. Forces-Korea, General Paul LaCamera, warned American troops to stay vigilant, avoid areas with protests and tell superiors of travel plans in case "something unexpected" happens.

Yoon, a career prosecutor, squeezed out a victory in the tightest presidential election in South Korean history in 2022, riding a wave of discontent over economic policy, scandals and gender wars.

But his support ratings have been at around 20 per cent for months and the opposition captured nearly two-thirds of parliament seats in an April election.

Yoon has caused unease among South Koreans by branding his critics "communist totalitarian and anti-state forces." In November, he denied wrongdoing in response to accusations of influence-peddling against him and his wife, and he has taken a hard line against labour unions.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/south-korea-martial-law-impeachment-1.7401780
 
Why wouldn't it be? Both clearly would lead to a crisis (obv they aren't alone there, but due to magnitude they aren't just an encyclopedic note), and South Korea is in crisis.
personally i think the issue is more that the president has effective powers to call in the military and shut everything down like this. he just played his hand too early (misreading how the numerous disenfranchised elements would react to a takeover), and didn't want to preside over killing thousands in riots.

crisises due to bad underfooting, if this is even that, are bound to happen. a president having the legal option to do this is much more deliberately constructed. issues like tuesday is why the idea of seperation of power exists.
 

South Koreans face danger if Yoon stays - ruling party chief​

South Korea's ruling party chief has called for President Yoon Suk Yeol to "suspend his duties soon", saying that citizens could be in "great danger" if he remained in power.
Han Doong-hoon, the leader of the People Power Party (PPP), added that his party had received "credible evidence" that Yoon had ordered the arrest of key politicians on "anti-state charges" when he declared martial law on Tuesday night.
His comments, made at an emergency party meeting on Friday, are a departure from his earlier stand that his party would block the opposition's impeachment motion, which was tabled on Wednesday.
The opposition needs at least eight ruling party MPs to back the impeachment motion for it to succeed.

Yoon shocked the country on Tuesday night when he declared emergency martial law, citing threats from "anti-state forces" and North Korea.

But it soon became clear that his move had been spurred not by external threats but by his own domestic political troubles.

The order was abruptly reversed hours later after 190 MPs managed to make it into the parliament and vote it down - some of them climbing fences and breaking barricades to get into the chamber.

Han on Friday expressed concerns that "extreme actions", such as the martial law declaration, could be repeated if Yoon remained in office.

"[These are] putting the Republic of Korea and its people at great risk," he said.

He added that his party had learnt about plans to jail arrested opposition politicians in a detention centre in Gwacheon, a city south of Seoul.

His comments are the first clear indication that the president's own party may now vote with the opposition to help impeach him.

Opposition lawmakers are concerned that there will be another attempt to impose martial law. Some of them earlier told BBC they have been staying close to the National Assembly grounds so they could get there quickly to vote down any such declaration.

Meanwhile, ruling party MP Cho Kyung-tae became the first ruling party MP to publicly voice support for Yoon's impeachment.

"The choice between standing on the side of the people by suspending the president's duties or becoming an ally of the forces that imposed martial law is a matter for politicians to judge," Cho said on Friday.

"I hope that all the politicians of the People's Power will stand on the side of the people," he added.

The capital, Seoul, has seen more than two days of street protests demanding Yoon's resignation, while police said he is being investigated for "insurrection".

People have also been flooding PPP lawmakers with text messages, urging them to vote for Yoon's impeachment, according to South Korean media reports.

One MP, Shin Sung-bum, received more than 4,000 such messages on Facebook, The Chosun Daily reported.

More than seven out of 10 South Koreans were in favour of the impeachment, a survey by local pollster Realmeter showed on Thursday.

The impeachment motion needs 200 votes to pass. The opposition have 192 seats and would need at least eight of the 108 ruling party MPs to back their motion for it to pass.

Before his attempt to place the country under military rule, Yoon had been beset by low popularity ratings, corruption allegations and an opposition-led legislature that reduced him to a lame-duck leader.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy8y7ggm89lo
 

South Korea ruling party opposes impeachment despite its leader's stunning comments about president​

Party leader Han Dong-hun said president wanted to arrest officials this week, still poses 'high risk'

South Korea's ruling party leader said President Yoon Suk Yeol needs to be removed from power for trying to impose martial law, though members of his People Power Party reaffirmed late on Friday its formal opposition to impeaching the president.

Yoon shocked the nation — and his own conservative PPP — on Tuesday, when he gave the military sweeping emergency powers in order to root out what he called "anti-state forces" and overcome obstructionist political opponents.

Yoon rescinded the declaration about six hours later after parliament, including some members of his party, voted to oppose the decree.

The main opposition Democratic Party has submitted a motion to impeach Yoon and scheduled a vote in parliament for Saturday, scheduled to begin at 3 a.m. ET. The PPP has vowed to oppose the motion, a position it reaffirmed following a lengthy meeting of its lawmakers — at least some of whom would need to back it for the motion to succeed — on Friday night.

PPP leader Han Dong-hun had earlier suggested the party's stance on impeachment might be shifting, when he said there was "a high risk of extreme actions such as this emergency martial law being repeated" while Yoon remained in power.

He also cited "credible evidence" that Yoon had intended to arrest and detain political leaders at Gwacheon, just south of Seoul.

"I believe that President Yoon Suk Yeol's immediate suspension of office is necessary to protect the Republic of Korea and its people in light of the newly revealed facts," Han said.

He did not explicitly call for impeachment or respond to reporters when asked for clarification.

The presidential office later denied any such order to arrest prominent politicians had been given, the Yonhap news agency reported.

Yoon's term would expire in 2027, but some PPP members urged Yoon to resign before the vote, saying they did not want a repeat of the 2016 impeachment of then-President Park Geun-hye, which triggered the implosion of the party and a victory by liberals in presidential and general elections.

"We cannot impeach the president tomorrow and hand over the regime to Lee Jae-myung's Democratic Party," PPP lawmaker Yoon Sang-hyun told reporters.

Lee said the opposition party has been contacting and persuading PPP members to join efforts to impeach Yoon. He downplayed the significance of Han's comments, saying it will likely be "his individual opinion," noting that PPP's official position remains unchanged.

Yoon absent from meeting discussing his future​

To succeed, an impeachment bill would need support from two-thirds of the 300-member assembly. Yoon's party has 108 legislators, so eight would have to side with the opposition for the bill to pass.

If parliament votes to impeach, the president is suspended from exercising his powers until an impeachment trial is held by the Constitutional Court. The prime minister serves as leader in an acting capacity.

Yoon has not been seen in public since rescinding martial law early on Wednesday and did not attend the PPP meeting on Friday.

Police have launched investigations into the president and Kim Yong-hyun, the defence minister who allegedly encouraged him to declare martial law and who has since resigned.

The defence ministry said three army commanders were suspended over the imposition of martial law, while military prosecutors were seeking to bar 10 officers from travelling overseas.

Details were slowly emerging about the chaos that engulfed Seoul on Tuesday night following Yoon's surprise declaration, which stirred painful memories of the country's long years of military rule following the Second World War.

Kwak Jong-geun, the special warfare commander, said he defied an order from then-defence minister Kim to drag lawmakers out of parliament and instead ordered his troops not to enter the area where lawmakers were meeting.

Yoon's approval ratings had swooned since his election, with damaging results in legislative elections earlier this year and a number of politically damaging stories. Yoon moved his presidential office to the defence ministry compound in central Seoul, a step estimated to cost $40 million, and his wife has been criticized for accepting luxury items as gifts

Ahn Gwi-ryeong, a spokesperson for the opposition Democratic Party, said she believed the people had already psychologically impeached Yoon.

"Who could trust a president declaring martial law, almost like a child playing games, or entrust the nation to such leadership?" she said to Reuters on Thursday.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/south-korea-yoon-president-powers-1.7402948
 

Attempt to impeach South Korean president fails as ruling party boycotts vote​

Boycott by president's ruling party prevents passage of motion against Yoon Suk Yeol

A South Korean legislative push to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol over his short-lived imposition of martial law fell through on Saturday after most lawmakers from his conservative governing party boycotted the vote.

The defeat of the motion is expected to intensify public protests calling for Yoon's ouster and deepen political chaos in South Korea, with a survey suggesting a majority of South Koreans support the president's impeachment.

Yoon's martial law declaration drew criticism from his own ruling conservative party, but it is also determined to oppose Yoon's impeachment apparently because it fears losing the presidency to liberals.

Impeaching Yoon required support from two-thirds of the National Assembly, or 200 of its 300 members. The opposition parties who brought the impeachment motion had 192 seats, but only three lawmakers from PPP participated in the vote. The motion was scrapped without ballot counting because the number of votes didn't reach 200.

National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik called the result "very regrettable" and an embarrassing moment for the country's democracy that has been closely watched by the world.

"The failure to hold a qualified vote on this matter means we were not even able to exercise the democratic procedure of deciding on a critical national issue," he said.

Opposition parties could submit a new impeachment motion after a new parliamentary session opens next Wednesday.

South Korea's main opposition Democratic Party said it would not give up its attempt to impeach Yoon. But Yoon's People Power Party said it would find a "more orderly, responsible" way to resolve the crisis than impeachment of the president.

There are worries that Yoon won't be able to serve out his remaining 2½ years in office because his leadership took a huge hit. Many experts say some ruling party lawmakers could eventually join opposition parties' efforts to impeach Yoon if public demands for it grow further.

If Yoon is impeached, his powers will be suspended until the Constitutional Court decides whether to remove him from office. If he is removed, an election to replace him must take place within 60 days.

Members repeatedly called to vote​

Woo repeatedly urged ruling party members to return to the chamber to participate in the vote, waiting several hours for them to come.

At one point, Democratic Party leaders visited a hall on the floor below the main chamber where PPP lawmakers were gathered, attempting to persuade them to vote. After being blocked from entering, they angrily accused the conservatives' leadership of preventing its lawmakers from voting freely.

Earlier Saturday, Yoon issued a public apology over the martial law decree, saying he won't shirk legal or political responsibility for the declaration and promising not to make another attempt to impose martial law. He said would leave it to his party to chart a course through the country's political turmoil, "including matters related to my term in office."

"The declaration of this martial law was made out of my desperation. But in the course of its implementation, it caused anxiety and inconveniences to the public. I feel very sorry over that and truly apologize to the people who must have been shocked a lot," Yoon said.

Since taking office in 2022, Yoon has struggled to push his agenda through an opposition-controlled parliament and grappled with low approval ratings amid scandals involving himself and his wife.

In his martial law announcement on Tuesday night, Yoon called parliament a "den of criminals" bogging down state affairs and vowed to eliminate "shameless North Korea followers and anti-state forces."

The turmoil resulting from Yoon's bizarre and poorly-thought-out stunt has paralyzed South Korean politics and sparked alarm among key diplomatic partners like the U.S. and Japan.

Troops had encircled parliament building​

Tuesday night saw special forces troops encircling the parliament building and army helicopters hovering over it, but the military withdrew after the National Assembly unanimously voted to overturn the decree, forcing Yoon to lift it before daybreak Wednesday. The declaration of martial law was the first of its kind in more than 40 years in South Korea. Eighteen lawmakers from the ruling party voted to reject Yoon's martial law decree along with opposition lawmakers.

Yoon's speech fuelled speculation that he and his party may push for a constitutional amendment to shorten his term, instead of accepting impeachment, as a way to ease public anger over the marital law and facilitate Yoon's early exit from office.

Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the main liberal opposition Democratic Party, told reporters that Yoon's speech was "greatly disappointing" and that the only way forward is his immediate resignation or impeachment. His party called Yoon's martial law "unconstitutional, illegal rebellion or coup."

The passage of Yoon's impeachment motion appeared more likely Friday when the chair of Yoon's party called for his removal on Friday, but the party remained formally opposed to impeachment.

On Saturday, tens of thousands of people densely packed several blocks of roads leading up to the National Assembly, waving banners, shouting slogans and dancing and singing along to K-pop songs with lyrics changed to call for Yoon's ouster.

Protesters also gathered in front of PPP's headquarters near the Assembly, angrily shouting for its lawmakers to vote to impeach Yoon.

A smaller crowd of Yoon's supporters, which still seemed to be in the thousands, rallied in separate streets in Seoul, decrying the impeachment attempt they saw as unconstitutional.

Lawmakers on Saturday first voted on a bill appointing a special prosecutor to investigate stock price manipulation allegations surrounding Yoon's wife. Some lawmakers from Yoon's party were seen leaving the hall after that vote, triggering angry shouts from opposition lawmakers.

On Friday, PPP chair Han Dong-hun, who criticized Yoon's martial law declaration, said he had received intelligence that during the brief period of martial law Yoon ordered the country's defence counterintelligence commander to arrest and detain unspecified key politicians based on accusations of "anti-state activities."

Hong Jang-won, first deputy director of South Korea's National Intelligence Service, told lawmakers in a closed-door briefing Friday that Yoon had ordered him to help the defence counterintelligence unit to detain key politicians. The targeted politicians included Han, Lee and Woo, according to Kim Byung-kee, one of the lawmakers who attended the meeting.

The Defence Ministry said Friday it suspended three military commanders including the head of the defence counterintelligence unit over their involvement in enforcing martial law.

Vice-Defence Minister Kim Seon Ho has told parliament that Defence Minister Kim Yong Hyun ordered the deployment of troops to the National Assembly after Yoon imposed martial law. Opposition parties accused Kim of recommending to Yoon to enforce martial law.

Kim resigned Thursday, and prosecutors imposed an overseas travel ban on him.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/yoon-south-korea-impeachment-vote-1.7404432
 
the chaos continues... S.Korea is overdue for political violence it seems to me, but then I think most western nations are ripe for general violence (they all seem to be voting for it whether they realize it or not, including S.Korea) So reading into this deeper, this guy was feeding off the manosphere right wing grievance politics? I'm not surprised he won off that platform, and I'm not surprised that he very quickly became deeply unpopular after trying to run the nation with such a brain-dead platform.
 
There is chaos everywhere in "the west". Massive incompetence leads to that. It is a matter of time.

There is already an autogolpe by the sitting government - prompted by the EU - in Romenia, where they annuled an election because they disliked the result.
The germans are openly discussing banning political parties that disagree with the "governing consensus".
The french 5th republic is in collapse, wainting for the providential man (or woman) who'll set up the next regime, as usual there.
The british have the most unpopular government ever just a few months adter their last election, an election held today would gove a french scenario with three opposed blocks unable to gorm a government, and on top of that the economy is about to collapse because it can't suspain the balance of payments through the new economic crisis.

Both SK and France are now ingovernable. They can still be managed, "caretaker governemnts", but not governed until they have some kind of regime change. Presidentialist regimes where the president lost authority don't wont.
 

S Korea's President Yoon vows to 'fight to the end'​

Embattled South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol has defended his shock decision to declare martial law last week, saying he did it to protect the country's democracy.
In a surprise televised address on Thursday, he said the attempt was a legal decision to "prevent the collapse" of democracy and counter the opposition's "parliamentary dictatorship".
Yoon has suggested that he would not step down ahead of a second vote to impeach him in parliament on Saturday.
"I will stand firm whether I'm impeached or investigated," he said. "I will fight to the end".

The president and his allies are facing investigations on insurrection charges, and he and several of them have been banned from leaving South Korea.
On Thursday, the opposition-led parliament voted to impeach police chief Cho Ji-ho and justice minister Park Sung-jae. The two officials have been immediately suspended.
Unlike impeachment motions against presidents, which require 200 votes in the 300-strong National Assembly to be passed, other officials can be impeached with 150 votes.
In his address, his first since his apology over the weekend, Yoon denied that his martial law order was an act of insurrection, claiming that his political rivals were creating "false incitement" to bring him down.
Yoon repeated many of the same arguments that he used on the night he declared martial law: that the opposition was dangerous, and that by seizing control, he had been trying to protect the public and defend democracy.
However, Yoon added that he would not avoid his "legal and political responsibilities".

Last Saturday, an attempt by opposition lawmakers to impeach the president failed after members of his own ruling People Power Party (PPP) boycotted the vote. But opposition members are set to hold another impeachment vote this weekend and have vowed to hold one every Saturday until Yoon is removed from office.
The floor leader of the PPP, Choo Kyung-ho, stepped down after the failed impeachment attempt, and on Thursday the party elected Kwon Seong-dong, a Yoon loyalist, as his replacement.
Kwon told reporters on Thursday that he would hold discussions with PPP lawmakers on whether they should continue opposing Yoon's impeachment.
Yoon's party had been hoping to convince the president to leave office early, rather than force him out.
Minutes before Yoon spoke, his party leader Han Dong-hoon appeared on television saying it had become clear that the president was not going to step aside. Han then urged members of the party to vote to remove him from office this Saturday.
The opposition tabled another impeachment motion on Thursday, setting the stage for a vote at 17:00 local time (09:00 GMT) Saturday.
If South Korea's parliament passes the impeachment bill, a trial would be held by the Constitutional Court. Two-thirds of that court would have to sustain the majority for Yoon to be removed from office permanently.
Yoon has been a lame duck president since the opposition won the April general election by a landslide - his government has not been able to pass the laws it wanted and has been reduced to vetoing bills proposed by the opposition.
Yoon also accused North Korea sympathisers of trying to undermine his government when he declared martial law on the night of 3 December.
The announcement plunged the country into political turmoil. Protesters faced off against security forces in front of the National Assembly building while lawmakers scrambled to vote down Yoon's order.
Yoon withdrew his martial law order hours after it was blocked by lawmakers.
Since then, the country has remained on edge. There have been huge protests and strikes calling for Yoon's impeachment, and the presidential office was raided on Wednesday as Yoon faces multiple investigations on charges of insurrection and treason.
Meanwhile, ex-defence minister Kim Yong-hyun, who resigned and took responsibility for announcing martial law, attempted suicide while in detention on Tuesday, officials said. He is in a stable condition.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gp8p875g8o
 
🤡

North Korea media is calling South Korea a dictatorship after its short-lived martial law​

North Korea has called South Korea a dictatorship after the latter's short-lived attempt at martial law.

Last week, South Korea's president, Yoon Suk-yeol, declared martial law in the country in a surprise announcement, citing the need to eliminate "anti-state" forces.

The unexpected decision was met with widespread protests, and hours later South Korea's parliament voted down the measure. Yoon's government quickly rescinded it.

In an article published by North Korea's state-run KCNA news agency on Wednesday, the situation in South Korea was characterized as "pandemonium."

It referred to Yoon as a "puppet" who proclaimed martial law "in a bid to escape from the worst ruling crisis."

Kim Jong Un exerts near-total control over North Korea's population, using extensive surveillance, state-run media, suppressing dissent, and offering no real choice in elections.

The article also criticized South Korea as a "fascist dictatorship," which it said was under the watch of the international community.

In reality, North Korea is widely regarded as a global pariah due to Kim's authoritarian governance, whereas South Korea is recognized as a democratic nation.

According to Freedom House's Freedom in the World rankings, South Korea scores 83 out of 100. In contrast, North Korea scores just 3 out of 100 and is designated "not free."

Martial law is no longer in place in South Korea, and Yoon is now under investigation for treason, with a travel ban preventing him from leaving the country.

But over the weekend an attempt to impeach Yoon narrowly failed after many lawmakers from his ruling People Power Party boycotted the vote. The main opposition party is expected to continue its impeachment efforts.

During the political chaos that rocked South Korea last week, there were concerns that North Korea might exploit the turmoil, using a moment of weakness to its advantage.

Business Insider reported that this could take the form of propaganda designed to erode trust in democracy in South Korea.
 
Some of the details emerging re: the South Korean coup attempt are wild...and it is wild not only that the impeachment vote against Yoon failed but that he has not been arrested himself.
 
Someone's playing too many Splinter Cell games. Rumors that Yoon's defense minister wanted to provoke a war with North Korea so Yoon could stay in power, sending drones into NK to try and get them to attack.
I'm sure the guys in US Army 2 ID would've loved that...


There are mounting suspicions that former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun intended to justify the declaration of martial law or a state of united defense by instigating a military conflict with North Korea by ordering strikes on the sites from which the North was launching trash-filled balloons and flying unmanned drones to Pyongyang.

Democratic Party lawmaker Park Beom-kye revealed Monday that he received a tip-off from a military whistleblower that the unmanned drones North Korea claimed Seoul had sent to Pyongyang in October were indeed sent on orders of the South Korean military — more specifically, on the orders of the former defense minister.
 
The french 5th republic is in collapse, wainting for the providential man (or woman) who'll set up the next regime, as usual there.
To be fair, that's just France being France. Nothing much to worry about. The only real question is if they'll have a short stint at empire again in the interim. xD
 
Top Bottom