MobBoss
Off-Topic Overlord
Wait a second, you disparage liberal arts degrees, yet consider a communications degree to make someone "intelligent enough"?
If you can quote me on saying a liberal arts degree means someone is not intelligent then go for it.
Otherwise, get the context right.
I am not saying Palin is a genius. Heck no. But come on people, she's intelligent enough to apparently get a degree and be wildly successful in life. You may disagree with her policys and she may say something off the wall every now and then, but come on...of course she is 'intelligent' enough, and fwiw, certainly getting better at sharpening her public image and conduct. Some people seem to want to view intelligence as some kind of black and white thing - your either intelligent or your not, but thats not how it works.
Just cause someone believes in something or says things you dont agree with doesnt make them a moron.
Form said:So it would appear that Palin actually fails on all 3 grounds. But of course you deny it again as you usually do, even though you can't provide any actual "proof" as I can.
I dont count proof from hugely biased websites and opinion as valid no, and fwiw, I think your own bias is so ingrained that you have made it personal to you, and it renders you completely unable to give even a modicum of credit to anyone not subscribing to your own brand of politics. And yes, thats just my opinion.