Mirror, Mirror, land in American politics.

Cutlass

The Man Who Wasn't There.
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
48,259
Location
US of A
So a transporter accident happened and for a day we got the Mirror, Mirror version of white supremacist Attorney General Jess Sessions. And a very strange result occurred. He essentially demolished all the standard right wing talking points about the Civil War.

Weird, huh?



Southerner Sessions: 'Slavery' alone caused the Civil War

by Paul Bedard | Feb 12, 2018, 3:36 PM


Jeff Sessions, a son of the South and President Trump’s attorney general, celebrated former President Abraham Lincoln’s 209th birthday with a blunt and bold statement that clashes with some of his fellow Alabamians and White House Chief of Staff John Kelly.

Speaking Monday at the Union League of Philadelphia’s Annual Lincoln Day celebration, he said slavery alone was the cause of the Civil War.

Though many Southerners try to say otherwise — and I love my people — slavery was the cause of the war. It was not states’ rights or tariffs or agrarian versus industrial economies. Those issues were all solvable and would have been solved. The cloud, the stain of human bondage—the buying and selling of human beings—was the unsolvable problem and was omnipresent from the beginning of the country,” said Sessions.

And the failure, the refusal of the South to come to grips with it — really to actually change this immoral system of enslavement — led to the explosion,” added Sessions.

The surprising statement in a thoughtful speech on Lincoln was the boldest — and bluntest — statement by the administration about the Civil War, ending some confusing and conflicting past statements.

Some Trump advisors saw Sessions as the best to deliver the message, being from the South and being the attorney general.

And a few saw it as correcting Kelly, who stepped into a controversy when he cited other reasons for the war such as a failure to compromise.

In October, he appeared on the new Fox show hosted by Laura Ingraham and said “men and women of good faith on both sides made their stand where their conscience had them make their stand,” and that “the lack of an ability to compromise led to the Civil War.”

Sessions didn’t mince words.

It is fair to say Lincoln did not start the war. He inherited it, and through extraordinary determination, eloquence, judgment, and courage, he finished it. His magnificent soldiers fighting other magnificent soldiers fought it out over four years, deciding the fate of the nation. The enslaved people of the South were emancipated and that by military victory. They venerated Father Abraham for it.

“The Union was preserved—the unwavering vision to which Lincoln was dedicated. The Constitution was preserved,” he said.

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/s...ry-alone-caused-the-civil-war/article/2648867
 
I mean he was keen on the KKK until he found out they liked the wacky tobacky.
"The war was over slavery and we should have won!"
 
how did his name escape me
 
I'd like to see Sessions' donor list, I'm sure there's plenty of drug dealers been paying him protection money

that episode is one of my favs, Uhura was hotter than usual
 
The Republicans have been trying to claim the heritage of Lincoln lately (and have tried to use it to "prove" that they're not racist). I assume that this is part of that campaign.
 
But nobody knows why the Civil war started ?
 
It started because Americans couldn't just sit down, listen to each other, and agree to ignore the fact that the country was built on one of the most hideous crimes in all history.
 
It's pretty similar to now! Where everybody forgets about the 2nd half of Sherman's career and the last chapter of Forrest's life.

Not amusing and easy? Not going to deal with it. Stonerlazy intellect chops man.
 
I'm not an American, so perhaps I am wrong about this, but I always thought there was more to the US civil war than just slavery. As I remember it, slavery was one of the issues but not the only one.
Letter to Horace Greeley said:
As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men every where could be free.
http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm
 
I'm not an American, so perhaps I am wrong about this, but I always thought there was more to the US civil war than just slavery. As I remember it, slavery was one of the issues but not the only one.

http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm


The only issue for the cause of the war was slavery. Slavery apologists like to claim otherwise. The quote you have is out of context. Lincoln didn't enter the war because of slavery; Lincoln entered the war because the South started a war to protect slavery.
 
And the whole 'State's rights" is a lie, as well. The southern states had spent the years leading up to the war trying to force a federal law on the northern states to make them capture and repatriate escaped slaves.

When that failed, they turned the argument around and demanded that their states should have the right to hold slaves, and that no federal law should get in their way.
 
It's pretty similar to now! Where everybody forgets about the 2nd half of Sherman's career and the last chapter of Forrest's life.

Not amusing and easy? Not going to deal with it. Stonerlazy intellect chops man.
But the 1st half of Sherman's career wasn't amusing, nor were the chapters of Nathan Bedford Forrest's life you reference...
 
Back
Top Bottom