MNOTW XVII: The Cursed Blade (Game Thread)
- Thread starter Autolycus
- Start date
That's my problem too. We all know that Day 1 votes are notoriously bad early on, but usually things start shifting when people get near the lynch threshold. That didn't happen.
Well, of course it was. Day one, no mere plurality lynch? Might as well not play.
Hi! My name is choxorn.
Al Sipsclar
Prince
Town:
Renata- Hunter
15 posts. Missing D1, interacting, fair bit of scumhunting D2. Pressing Lohr, switching to Cuth.
Winston Hughes-Fisherman
12 posts. D1: Fisherman talk - good tone. D2: 1 posts.
Lean town:
Snerk-Alchemist
11 posts. D1: questions Cuth's purpose, vote Renata, where are rules, insight into Tak's mind, pie fluff, Winston is softclaiming scum
D2: Meta-analysis. Votes Cuth, defends Lohr.
I'm probably just tinfoiling about Snerk.
Lohrenswald-Painter
16 posts. D1:Vote Tak, lore questions, forgot to read the rules, fluff. D2: Mostly on the defense.
Not sure if this is a clueless townie Lohr or a cunning scum Lohr.
Null:
Arakhor- Historian
9 posts.Mostly no game content: rules questions, explanations, tally-related, lamenting about the lack of game content.
Lean scum:
Takhisis-Farmer
13 posts. D1: Farmers are simple folk, bad Winston vote, interacting with Al. D2: fluff
Cuthillius- Child
4 posts. Keeps voting Lohrenswald. Disengaged.
I think Cuth is the only one who would kill Yako, because he's not new to Cuth. Vote: Cuthillius
Renata- Hunter
15 posts. Missing D1, interacting, fair bit of scumhunting D2. Pressing Lohr, switching to Cuth.
Winston Hughes-Fisherman
12 posts. D1: Fisherman talk - good tone. D2: 1 posts.
Lean town:
Snerk-Alchemist
11 posts. D1: questions Cuth's purpose, vote Renata, where are rules, insight into Tak's mind, pie fluff, Winston is softclaiming scum
D2: Meta-analysis. Votes Cuth, defends Lohr.
I'm probably just tinfoiling about Snerk.
Lohrenswald-Painter
16 posts. D1:Vote Tak, lore questions, forgot to read the rules, fluff. D2: Mostly on the defense.
Not sure if this is a clueless townie Lohr or a cunning scum Lohr.
Null:
Arakhor- Historian
9 posts.Mostly no game content: rules questions, explanations, tally-related, lamenting about the lack of game content.
Lean scum:
Takhisis-Farmer
13 posts. D1: Farmers are simple folk, bad Winston vote, interacting with Al. D2: fluff
Cuthillius- Child
4 posts. Keeps voting Lohrenswald. Disengaged.
I think Cuth is the only one who would kill Yako, because he's not new to Cuth. Vote: Cuthillius
vote: Takhisis
Didn't like his D1; like his D2 even less.
Feels different to the French rev game, where his irreverence carried a hint of towniness. Here it just feels like he's grabbing the first excuse.
Didn't like his D1; like his D2 even less.
Feels different to the French rev game, where his irreverence carried a hint of towniness. Here it just feels like he's grabbing the first excuse.
Tak looks worse to me, but I'd be fine with Cuth instead.
Al Sipsclar
Prince
Vote: Takhisis
I probably won't be around at EOD, so I'd like to consolidate while I can. I'm willing to give Cuth a chance, though now I feel convinced he killed Yako.
I probably won't be around at EOD, so I'd like to consolidate while I can. I'm willing to give Cuth a chance, though now I feel convinced he killed Yako.
Al Sipsclar
Prince
I'm voting with my town. Who are you voting with, choxorn impostor?
Lohrenswald
世界的 bottom ranked physicist
Not just clueless, but lazy as well, unfourtunately
Cuthillius, what do you have to say
Why would you say that? If you're convinced that he killed someone and then don't vote for them...
Vote: Al Sipsclar.
Is it actually scummy to do that, though?
Eh?
I still don't understand why you think that what Al said makes him scummy.
I still don't understand why you think that what Al said makes him scummy.
Al Sipsclar
Prince
Why do you think there's a town vig? There was only a single kill.
I actually did vote for Cuth after proposing that he might be the one killing Yako. Then Winston showed up and voted Tak. I might feel convinced about Cuth, but I don't have any evidence (other than Yako suggesting that Cuth's little fingers took the sword). OTOH, there's plenty of evidence against Tak, and I actually trust Winston's judgement about Tak more than my flimsy conviction about Cuth.
However, you, sir, like Tak, are super opportunistic with your vote, so I have to downgrade my read on you from Null to scum.
I actually did vote for Cuth after proposing that he might be the one killing Yako. Then Winston showed up and voted Tak. I might feel convinced about Cuth, but I don't have any evidence (other than Yako suggesting that Cuth's little fingers took the sword). OTOH, there's plenty of evidence against Tak, and I actually trust Winston's judgement about Tak more than my flimsy conviction about Cuth.
However, you, sir, like Tak, are super opportunistic with your vote, so I have to downgrade my read on you from Null to scum.
Well, you see, if I've understood Arakhor correctly, an alternative to your not wanting to lynch a mafia partner is your wanting not to be seen as the leader of the lynch of a vigilante. Either way, saying that a person is the killer and wanting to take the lynch away from them is very bad™.
What is this ‘plenty of evidence’ against me? I will assume it is another April Fools' prank until you can conclusively prove otherwise.
What is this ‘plenty of evidence’ against me? I will assume it is another April Fools' prank until you can conclusively prove otherwise.
