"based on interactions"
You're going to need to explain that a little more, Winston.
Snerk's pretty much my only town read, otherwise.
I can't easily explain it, except to say that a review of all the interactions between remaining players left me feeling like Snerk has positioned himself quite carefully.
What looks townie about him to you?
And why Lohren?If it's not Snerk, though, then who could Lohren's buddy be?
Well, Cuthillius could pop up and claim that he's actually a vigilante, a la the Biblical David, but otherwise...
Could be scum looking to score insight points.If Cuthilius killed Yako, he is either a (town?) vigilante or a scum. Al's not voting for him, after making a point about this statement, is very strange.
Wouldn't comment on the game design before you see the whole picture though.I don't really see why letting the lynched people keep talking in the thread instead of revealing allignment (and potentially role) would be a good game design decision
especially since this change doesn't apply to those killed as well
And why Lohren?
Anyway, long story short, someone claims to have vigged both Cuth and Tak. The story seems plausible though my gard remains up.
Just telling you what I've heard. You don't have to accept it as gospel.
Got some theories on how the scum could fit in but I dunno.