And I thought we weren't supposed to be accusing each other of powergaming and metagaming..
I had a similar experience in Government and Politics 2. I was a fresh noob, playing a forum game that I had no idea how to play. Over the course of the game, I said some really stupid stuff and experienced players (jehoshua) called me out on it. I then saw a threat brewing, and went for the jugular (jehoshua's offspring, to be exact), and I slayed them all.
Did jehoshua whine about me metagaming? Did he cry about how I shouldn't be able to do that? How it's unfair?
No. He gathered up his allies and after a few turns, managed to find and kill me.
I have much respect for jehoshua, even though he may be annoying and rude sometimes. Just because a player is good does NOT mean they should be brought down to the level of other players.
I read the rules. I invaded Partitionania. I took a risk, and I'm reaping the diplomatic benefits and penalties from that decision. In my opinion, I think some people went too far in adding the penalties. Had I invaded christos, or maybe double A, or even kinich, I'm sure the international response would have been extremely different.
And I also did many diplomacy deals with other players, including the Diamond Coalition. I didn't get to my position because the rules are broken, just like jehoshua didn't become (self-proclaimed) Regent of Government and Politics because he was handed the position by the GM. I earned what I have now, and accusing me of powergaming or abusing the system is so absurd.
And finally, the reason I oppose sub-GM control of China is because of comments like yours. You obviously want me gone, and you blatantly oppose me (including the "poll" to get me booted) When you say
anne frankly, we would all be better off without him
,
how can I trust you to be a fair and unbiased sub-GM towards me?