You only have one government for the whole age, as far as I know. You can't change anyway.Revolution stops you from changing government. Oh, the irony!
Like I said elsewhere, it's just not to my taste, same reason I don't love a lot of the Romantic composers or Hans Zimmer.What’s wrong with bombast?
Malinche would be very interesting, I thinkSomeone in other of my posts said something about Malintzin and now I think is possible the maya and mexican leader is gone be the same person so...
It doesn't say you can't change it. It says you can't enter any other type. As in, at the beginning of the Age.Really? Odd to specify that Mexico can't change then...
No. It forbids entering other governments, not changing. Entering other governments at the beginning of the Age.Which is what makes me think government changes are something in Modern.
What? Goodness I hope not - where was this suggested?You only have one government for the whole age, as far as I know. You can't change anyway.
It was in one of the Livestreams, probably Exploration.What? Goodness I hope not - where was this suggested?
Correct. It's more of the Civ boardgame >> Civ immersion stuff. There's a lot of it in Civ 7. You're really just picking the flavor of Celebration (1 out of 3 possible pairs of options per Age, excepting Mexico). There's no other practical benefit for choosing democracy over totalitarianism in the game, besides how they party.I just went back to the Exploration livestream thread to have a look, here are the governments. This may change in Modern, of course, but it seems that they are primarily (only?) about picking the flavour of your celebrations through that Age, bearing in mind that all policy cards are now wildcards. With this in mind, I'm not sure that changing governments is especially useful anyway? It's all about keeping your people happy to get the benefits of whichever one you choose.
View attachment 711872
Let us hope, but, yes, I'm sure you're right!Government in Civ7 is so... bland. This seems to me like something that will be reworked in the future, alongside Religion.
Huapango de Moncayo if anyone wants to listen to the original piece, perfect choice, it's almost the second national anthem.
Sor Juana is still my absolute pick, and looking at Mexico's abilities she would fit perfectly.I guess Benito Juarez won't be the Mexican "leader" in Civ7, if they get any. I prefer Juana Ines de la Cruz to be a leader instead of Frida Kahlo. But I guess Frida is more famous.....
R I E M P E N D OLike I said elsewhere, it's just not to my taste, same reason I don't love a lot of the Romantic composers or Hans Zimmer.
Is it not El Son de la Negra? (A blend of the two?)Huapango de Moncayo if anyone wants to listen to the original piece, perfect choice, it's almost the second national anthem.
Or simply put, a summary of the political history of most of Latin AmericaRevolution stops you from changing government. Oh, the irony!
Well if there IS a latinx leader, it is not Benito Juárez, as he's a unique GP for the Mexicans.I’m onboard with the Porfirio Díaz leader theory. Civ VII needs someone with a walrus moustache!