Bigfoot3814
Deity
Of course not. But you said no reason, not better reasons not to.
OK sure. It's just that space exploration costs so much money and usually they don't find very much.
Of course not. But you said no reason, not better reasons not to.
You're just saying that because you haven't been let in on the big secret: All the chimps they sent into space came back superintelligent. Keep it on the QT, would you?OK sure. It's just that space exploration costs so much money and usually they don't find very much.
Dumbass, everybody knows all the chimps they send into space end up in the future on the Planet of The Apes.You're just saying that because you haven't been let in on the big secret: All the chimps they sent into space came back superintelligent. Keep it on the QT, would you?
How come the Russians never went? How come we are not still going today? How come we don't even have a very small mine on the moon?
I'd have loved to hear his reasoning how electric devices actually work then...I think I told this story once before, but I once met a fairly intelligent and well-read guy who insisted electricity wasn't real, and demonstrated this fact to me by touching high voltage power lines, naturally resulting in electrocution and hospitalisation. People believe lots of stupid things.
I'd have loved to hear his reasoning how electric devices actually work then...
The Russians watched the broadcast from the moon. Had the signal come from elsewhere, they would have been quite happy to say "hey, that footage isn't being broadcast from the moon."
This is what frustrates me about so many conspiracy theories is that I don't actually need physical proof of anything when logic disproves it outright
We don't wanna bear the cost of space exploration. The most effecient means of moving around in space consists of nuclear bomb propulstion, with it we could get a cryo ship to the nearest star at around .5c for a one way ticket of several years here on earth, maybe more taking into account time dilation.
But nuclear is evil, must be exterminated! Must never be used. We could get to the moon in a lot less time and to Mars in a few days if I remember correctly.
I would say solar sails are a LOT more efficient. Nuclear bombs would first have to be built, and when used in a spacecraft there must be someway of containing the explosion (or at least focusing it). Current nuclear stockpiles are aging
OK sure. It's just that space exploration costs so much money and usually they don't find very much.
# Actual lunar landing - faked filming – Still others believe that men did land on the moon, but that the photography was of very low media quality and in most cases unsuitable or even unusable. Therefore the U.S. government (NASA), since it had to present proof of the space program's success to justify taxpayers' money and keep the program alive, altered, modified and even faked many of the pictures and video, launching a subsequent media campaign with great success.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKedyQQkZQ&feature=relatedOf course we went to the moon. There's a great deal of evidence, including the fact that artifacts left behind on the moon are clearly visible through telescopes, of that fact. The only good thing about this conspiracy theory is watching 70-odd year old Buzz Aldron KTFO a guy half his age who was dissing him about it. Instantly made Buzz the best astronaut ever.