Prostitution & Porn Legality/Morality?

Which is moral/immoral? (assuming free choice / non-coercion)


  • Total voters
    113
Sex isn't any worse, than say, plumbing. Is the profession of plumbing immoral because it treats men as plumbing objects?

actually the more I think about it, it doesn't seem so wrong. Women enjoy porn too, and women can enjoy prostitutes as well. Although no woman actually goes to a prostitute by herself (and I don't think our brothels in Nevada accept single women- but they will accept couples). So provide it's equal and women are able to enjoy the same activities, it isn't so bad.

And a more interesting poll would have been: Have you ever solicited a prostitute. And make it a public poll :lol:. Okay if it was public no one would vote yes, you'd have to make it private.
 
So if I've earned the means to secure the services of a prostitute, that should not be taken away?

I'm not sure what you are asking. I was talking about the libertarian view of taxes (which I don't necessarily agree with). They basically don't believe in taxes. but I'm get OT for this thread, let's not turn it into yet another political discussion.
 
Everytime I think you're actually pretty smart you go and repeat these same BS conservative talking points.

I don't necessarily agree with it. But I still think it's a good and legitimate question. It's not a conservative talking point (the repugs have no problem taxing you to get money to fight their illegal wars), it's a libertarian talking point.
 
I don't necessarily agree with it. But I still think it's a good and legitimate question. It's not a conservative talking point (the repugs have no problem taxing you to get money to fight their illegal wars), it's a libertarian talking point.
Most American libertarians(who aren't actually libertarians seeing as they support capitalism) would consider themselves conservative as well.
 
By government outlawing prostitution, it has limited my freedom to enjoy the money that I have earned.

very libertarian point of view. I like it.

I'm not a libertarian mind you. But they are right on a couple things.
 
So my question is (I won't make a thread on this, as I think it will be closed):

If you believe prostitution (or porn) is moral, would you participate in it? Say for example you had no hope of getting a gf (disabled for example), would you do it? If not, why?
 
is it wrong to keep what you earn? You earned it after all.
"Earn" and "obtain" are held to be distinct concepts by many on the left (and some on the right). As such, Right-Libertarians often appears to be primarily self-interested to such people, because they express greater interest in the protection of individual obtainment than the ethical distribution of wealth. Just to clarify, you see.
 
Their morality is irrelevant to the fact that both should be legal.
 
A-okay and they should be legal, taxed, and regulated. :goodjob:

More freedom, more tax dollars, less money spent on enforcement. We all win.

The only issue with prostitution would be say, STDs. But if we REGULATE it, we establish health standards that prevent this, more or less.

Progressive victory!
 
Their morality is irrelevant to the fact that both should be legal.

This, and a lot of stuff about how shoving markets underground fills them with poison. Legalize and regulate. Keep the whores and the drug dealers and the bookies honest.
 
This, and a lot of stuff about how shoving markets underground fills them with poison. Legalize and regulate. Keep the whores and the drug dealers and the bookies honest.
But don't call them "whores", at least not in this context. It's a slur, and its use is complacent in the marginalisation that causes many of the problems faced by sex workers. (Just saying, y'know. It's important to keep this stuff straightened out.)
 
But don't call them "whores", at least not in this context. It's a slur, and its use is complacent in the marginalisation that causes many of the problems faced by sex workers. (Just saying, y'know. It's important to keep this stuff straightened out.)

I appreciate what you're trying to do. :) FWIW, if I knew any more demeaning words to describe drug dealers and bookies I would have used those too.
 
But don't call them "whores", at least not in this context. It's a slur, and its use is complacent in the marginalisation that causes many of the problems faced by sex workers. (Just saying, y'know. It's important to keep this stuff straightened out.)
1The word of the LORD that came unto Hosea, the son of Beeri, in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah, and in the days of Jeroboam the son of Joash, king of Israel.

2The beginning of the word of the LORD by Hosea. And the LORD said to Hosea, Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms: for the land hath committed great whoredom, departing from the LORD.
 
Google leads to an alternate translation:

2 When the LORD began to speak through Hosea, the LORD said to him, "Go, take to yourself an adulterous wife and children of unfaithfulness, because the land is guilty of the vilest adultery in departing from the LORD."

The King James Version isn't always the best reference for progressive Christianity. ;)
 
Top Bottom