Random Rants 76: Argh! Augh! Ahhh!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, well, but it's ‘football’ so… well, I'll just chalk it down to the fact that I cannot connect with that ‘sport’.
There are a lot of pieces here, actually, not all of which are directly made clear by my comment, so I'll try to make them clearer. By doing that, I'm going to draw out the explanation and highlight a bunch of assumptions - making the warrants for what I have to say explicit, as it were - so I apologize about the wall of text.

One team, the LA Rams, is in the Super Bowl because they won a game against my favorite team, the New Orleans Saints, that turned largely on the most egregious uncalled penalty in the history of the NFL playoffs. This is not a particularly large amount of hyperbole; most NFL writers and fans seem to also agree and the primary narrative arising from the game is that the refs screwed up and it threw the game. So I was already a salt mine in time for the second game of the night.

That game pitted the New England Patriots, a team that has been at the top of the sport for 18 years, against the Kansas City Chiefs, a team that has not been at the top of the sport for 18 years and which in fact has won zero titles in the Super Bowl era. The Chiefs are fun to watch and they have an outstanding rookie quarterback with a cannon arm and a ton of personality. It's been fun to see Chiefs fans happy lately, which is not a thing you get to see very often. On the other side of the ledger, the Patriots are, obviously, a good team, but their fanbase is arguably the worst and most obnoxious in American sports, and they gained notoriety over the last few years because some of their players, staff, and owners have close relationships with Donald Trump (who, as usual, ruins everything) and, bizarrely, Vladimir Putin. The Pats have been connected to cheating and spying scandals to varying degrees of culpability. They're simply the most hateable team in the country. If you're not a New England fan, you're really not a New England fan.

They have also appeared in two straight Super Bowls (now three) and four of the last seven. So a big chunk of that comment was about Patriots fatigue.

Anyway, the Pats led for most of the game before the Chiefs' rookie quarterback led them storming back for the tie at the end of regulation by racking up 24 fourth-quarter points. Then, the NFL's overtime rules, which have sucked for a long time and probably will continue to suck even if changed, allowed the Patriots, once they won the coin toss, to march down the field and score to win the game without once putting the ball in the Chiefs offense's hands. This was a predictable and legal outcome; nobody got jobbed like in the Saints-Rams game. But it was a frustrating and lame outcome all the same.

Another big chunk of it was just sportscaster fatigue. It is very easy to make fun of the stupid memes that color commentators bring up during games. They love to talk about football players who played basketball in college, because it gives them a "reason" to be good at jumping and catching balls thrown extremely high. They love to cite absurd statistics in hyperspecific situations that are not predictive in any way, imply that they are predictive, but fail to give any logical reason why they would be.

Most obviously, in this situation, they love to bring up the history of the game. I guarantee you that the shadow of the 2002 Super Bowl will be long over this game. It won't be because of the players. Pretty much the only two people on the 2018-19 Patriots who also went to the 2002 Super Bowl are the head coach and the quarterback; none of the Rams are in that situation. The similarity is the fans - and oh they will stroke Pats fans' egos by rerunning footage and doing interviews and exhausting all possible avenues of comparison. I was trained as a historian. I love contextualizing things and making this past meaningful. But this isn't meaningful. It's just a bukkake-like spray of semi-relevant information, none of which will actually affect or condition the outcome on the field. Besides, those are bad memories for me, and I don't want to relive them.

I don't necessarily think that the outcome of the game will be the same. I hope the Rams win and will be pleased if that happens. Watching the game, though, will be uncomfortable. My friends and I have better ways to enjoy ourselves with alcohol and snacks than any of this.

Normally, again, I could accomplish this by saying to a fellow American, "the Saints got jobbed and the Pats are the worst, I'm not watching this year". But not all of the assumptions make sense if you're not a fan, so here's the explanation.
 
My take away from all is that Los Angeles must really lack of sports franchise-ready identity if they had to call their team "the Rams". Or is picking a vaguely tough-seeming animal the norm, and it's just coincident that the other three team in this situation happened to have very regionally-specific names?

(In Britain, only only sports which use colourful names are Good Rugby and Bad Rugby, and all their names are all generic and mostly terrible, so I don't have a frame of reference.)
 
Last edited:
My take away from all is that Los Angeles must really lack of sports franchise-ready identity if they had to call their team "the Rams". Or is picking a vaguely tough-seeming animal the norm, and it's just coincident that the other three team in this situation happened to have very regionally-specific names?

(In Britain, only only sports which use colourful names are Good Rugby and Bad Rugby, and all their names are all generic and mostly terrible, so I don't have a frame of reference.)


Well, technically they were the Rams before they moved to LA (the first time) so it isn't like LA is responsible for naming them that. However, the fact that LA has all these imported teams and has no identity calling for renaming any of them does say something about LA. The most egregious is the Lakers, named for their home in the 'land of 10,000 lakes' state who got shipped out to the desert and met with "Yeah, Lakers, fine, whatever."
 
My take away from all is that Los Angeles must really lack of sports franchise-ready identity if they had to call their team "the Rams". Or is picking a vaguely tough-seeming animal the norm, and it's just coincident that the other three team in this situation happened to have very regionally-specific names?
It's mostly the latter (although vaguely tough-seeming references to indigenous people are also popular). Like Tim said, the Rams didn't start in Los Angeles (although they spent five decades there) and only recently moved back to the city.

The Chiefs aren't really a "regional" name either (there's nothing particularly "regional" to Kansas and Missouri about indigenous Americans) and actually refer to a nickname that the city's then-mayor had on account of his history with the Boy Scouts.
 
My take away from all is that Los Angeles must really lack of sports franchise-ready identity if they had to call their team "the Rams". Or is picking a vaguely tough-seeming animal the norm, and it's just coincident that the other three team in this situation happened to have very regionally-specific names?

(In Britain, only only sports which use colourful names are Good Rugby and Bad Rugby, and all their names are all generic and mostly terrible, so I don't have a frame of reference.)


American sports teams get their names from whatever. Like the others said, many of them come from something to do with the place they are from. But for the most part, they don't. And from that starting point, many pro sports teams have moved over the years.

Los Angeles is not considered a great sports city, despite being the second largest city in the country, with a metro area population over 10million. For some reason, despite that, it's a hard city for teams to make a profit in. And so teams have often left for smaller cities. Possibly it has to do with that there is just so much entertainment possibilities in and around LA that sports is just one of many, and not a center of the community.
 
I really need to be more careful. I left my wallet out on my desk (personal documents are in it) and she asked why I had it out. :undecide:
 
I apologize about the wall of text.
I've just finished reading it and think you should withdraw that apology.
 
American sports teams get their names from whatever. Like the others said, many of them come from something to do with the place they are from. But for the most part, they don't. And from that starting point, many pro sports teams have moved over the years.

Los Angeles is not considered a great sports city, despite being the second largest city in the country, with a metro area population over 10million. For some reason, despite that, it's a hard city for teams to make a profit in. And so teams have often left for smaller cities. Possibly it has to do with that there is just so much entertainment possibilities in and around LA that sports is just one of many, and not a center of the community.

Actually, sports teams in LA are always among the most profitable in their leagues. The problem with LA is that the city plays hard ball in ways that leagues cannot allow their teams to accept.Times have changed and the NFL has allowed Kroenke to foot the bill for his own stadium, mostly because Jerry Jones has demonstrated that there is just too much money in owning a stadium to insist that he can't. But when the Rams left LA it was because the city would not, under any circumstance, go along with what at the time was considered 'the way the NFL does business,' meaning the city pays to provide a place for the team to play.

Whether the Rams owner could, or would, have footed that bill wasn't the issue. The issue was that at that time there were certainly less than half of the owners who could, and a lot of teams were in cities where even if the owner did foot the bill they'd lose money if they did. How would you like to have been handed the management contract for a 70,000 seat open air arena in 1970s Cincinnati and told "I paid for this out of pocket, now you have to book enough business to make it pay off"? If the Rams had agreed to LA's demands it would have set a precedent that at least half the league couldn't have afforded to follow.

Kroenke brought the Rams back to LA because St Louis was playing the "if you'll pay to build a stadium in LA why should we pay to build you one here" game, which is a dead play. Spend five billion for a building that has a tenant EIGHT DAYS A YEAR in a city where there is basically no other demand for it and half the year it will be shut down by the weather? Yeah, hard pass.
 
Here's a very silly rant: I had Calibre ebook management download the metadata for an eBook I just downloaded. Unfortunately, the description came along with a review that spoiled the ending. :(
 
some of their players, staff, and owners have close relationships with Donald Trump (who, as usual, ruins everything) and, bizarrely, Vladimir Putin.

Putin still has one of Robert Kraft's Super Bowl rings, doesn't he?

From my perspective, I don't know how much I'd enjoy watching the game even without the added context of how the Rams and Patriots managed to win their games- the former team is my favorite team's biggest rivalry right now, with a penchant for beating the Seahawks in ridiculous ways before they got good and a penchant for winning in humiliating ways now that they are good, and the latter team is the Patriots, which, well, you explained what's with them pretty well in your post. Of all possible Super Bowl matchups, I think this is the one I least want to see (Rams-Steelers is really the only one giving it a run for its money), and I can't honestly decide which one of them I want to win more (the Rams are certainly the more exciting of the two, though).
 
Here's a very silly rant: I had Calibre ebook management download the metadata for an eBook I just downloaded. Unfortunately, the description came along with a review that spoiled the ending. :(
That's unfortunate. :( A good reviewer never spoils the ending.


My rant: Still in the hospital. The doctor wanted to kick me out before I know everything I'm supposed to do at home (different doctor every 2-3 days and they don't seem to compare notes). The hospital is full now and someone else needed my space so I'm stashed in the patient lounge (fortunately no roommates yet). It was a weird conversation when I asked where the washrooms and the kitchenette were (they seemed mystified as to why I would want water, and I had to explain that I wanted to drink it). Oh, and they started asking odd questions I didn't understand and then realized that they were confusing me with my former roommate. There's a considerable difference between her issue and mine.

Rant #2: Didn't get to see the eclipse last night.
 
Last edited:
It might just be a placebo thing but I've always found that putting on fuzzy socks can help you stay warm, even though it only covers like 5% of your skin's surface area.

Extremities are the most important :yup:
 
badly hurting from a cold that doesn't end and on the web after a full week and ı see , in the interests of commercial amicability , like so that ı will not bombard their HQs from the orbit , ı see elsewhere ı have been permitted to speak . That Özal was bribed by the Italians to buy Tornados , but to balance that my post on Phantom wing drops has been deleted , as unworthy of being heard about ? Let's just start , shall we ?
 
I am getting nearly frozen feet after my usual open water training, which means swimming in the sea for about a hour or more. In winter, with sea water temp at around 13 Celsius such activity leads inevitably to very cold feet but lately it is going to far. I get out of the water with my feet completely white and insensible. It lasts about a hour until I return home and get a warm shower, then blood and life start coming back, being the small toe the last one leaving such zombied status among pins and needles.

So, I have bought a pair of silicone socks but they are so difficult to put on I will have to use vaseline or talc powders. Conclusion, I see myself visiting the pool more often, at least in winter.
 
It might just be a placebo thing but I've always found that putting on fuzzy socks can help you stay warm, even though it only covers like 5% of your skin's surface area.
And it works the other way too - I almost always feel overly warm, and for some reason going barefoot seems to make a huge difference keeping me cool. I could be wearing a heavy sweater and slacks, but if my feet are bare I'll be comfortable pretty much regardless of how warm it is inside. I do think it's interesting how much that affects you, maybe Lieutenant Dan was right about taking care of your feet, lol!

On a little bit of a personal and maybe unpleasant side, I've been having a problem like Aimee was recently when she went to the hospital. So on Thursday I bought a jar of prunes, and I've been eating three a day, and over the weekend I hadn't noticed any effect. Oh dear, until this morning, and all seemed to decide to work all at once!
 
On a little bit of a personal and maybe unpleasant side, I've been having a problem like Aimee was recently when she went to the hospital. So on Thursday I bought a jar of prunes, and I've been eating three a day, and over the weekend I hadn't noticed any effect. Oh dear, until this morning, and all seemed to decide to work all at once!

That's how it works. Hopefully you had something other than toilet paper. Even the softest of it feels awful afterwards. I used wet wipes (although disposing of them was disgusting, because you can't flush them).
 
My take away from all is that Los Angeles must really lack of sports franchise-ready identity if they had to call their team "the Rams". Or is picking a vaguely tough-seeming animal the norm, and it's just coincident that the other three team in this situation happened to have very regionally-specific names?

(In Britain, only only sports which use colourful names are Good Rugby and Bad Rugby, and all their names are all generic and mostly terrible, so I don't have a frame of reference.)
Our sports teams can move around, from time to time, so you'll get weird names that way sometimes. The Utah Jazz, for example, started out as the New Orleans Jazz and didn't change their name when they moved. Partly, it's because we don't have promotion and relegation, or inter-league continental competitions, and we have a geographically immense country (the contiguous states are about the size of Europe, but with half the population), so the business model has to be different. You're right about the animal-names thing, though, and they don't even need to sound tough. The current New Orleans basketball team is the Pelicans. :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom