This is honestly the first time someone has so ... well ... objected to the idea of club goods being separated from charity giving. I wonder if it's because civ would rather think of them in terms of 'operating costs'?
I dunno. If I go to a dinner with $100 plates and then find out that setting up the even cost $90 per head, I'd say it's fundamentally different to insist I gave $100 to charity. We're merely seeing that as a 90% operating cost, and ignoring that it's money being spent on myself?
I dunno. If I go to a dinner with $100 plates and then find out that setting up the even cost $90 per head, I'd say it's fundamentally different to insist I gave $100 to charity. We're merely seeing that as a 90% operating cost, and ignoring that it's money being spent on myself?