@innonimatu The logical conclusion of your argument seems to be that any time a state with a stronger military threatens a weaker one, the weaker state should immediately capitulate and negotiate a surrender.
If they cannot win any way, of course. Cut the losses. That's the only rational thing. What, you thing people want to go Afghanistan "for glory"? Die for the convenience of
other's strategic goals? Are you drunk on the propaganda also?
NATO's goal in Ukraine was to use it as a weapon. This war has already outright been called a "proxy war". Its aim has already been described as being about "bleeding Russia". Both on record as statemented from the US administration, which effectively sets policy in NATO. What is absent in the goals of ukranians fighting on? Protecting Ukraine. Protecting the ukranians.
It's like Churchill telling the french to fight on in 1940, to have their capital wrecked. No, they were smart to surrender and negotiate peace even though the price was high. They bounced back years later. Or even better, it's like the security guarantees given to Czechoslovakia and later Poland. There were even Dow when Poland got invaded, but there wasn't any actual invasion of Germany. The plan was to have the poles fight and die.
Is Canada reintroducing a two year universal draft? Is Canada changing its state budget in the major way it would be required if it was envisaging fighting WW3? No. Nor are any european countries, not the US. And all know that WW3 cannot be won anyway. But not even a serious conventional proxy war is on the plans. Ukranians though are expected to all die for... "glory"? For NATO bleeding Russia.
Loot at the cynicism of the whole "ukranian food exports" thing.
Read this piece. Despite the link text, it's about the ukranian food exports. It is being claimed in the media that grain is "rotting in silos" and needs to be exported. Apparently these silos are worse storage than cargo ship holds, or silos on teh destination countries. Grain only rots inside ukranian silos. Despite a history of grain being the staple of much of mankind because it's easy to stiore long ter, you'se supposed that there is now a need ro quickly export all of Ukraine's stockpiled food because "it's rooting".
To cut things short, this is a lie. What is happening is that foreign governments are in a panic about food prices. Ukraine's silos are to be emptied before it surrenders - to fill western european silos.
Estonia and Lithuania are pushing for European nations to send warships into the Black Sea to protect freighters carrying Ukrainian grain from potential Russian interference.
Russia has effectively blockaded Ukrainian ports as part of its invasion, leaving the government in Kyiv struggling to get grain shipments out and sending prices to near-record highs.
The concern is not food security in Ukraine, is having the ukranians pay for the "help" they get with they food they still have. Because high prices. And futuire scarcity finally being factored in. And
the russians get accused of looting and starving Ukraine?
It's like the essential workers fairy tale about medics, nurses, retail workers, etc during early covid waves, isn it? Pure cynicism from our rulers and their servants. They mean nothing of it. There were no raises, no improvemente of working conditions, nada.
And in this ukraine war there is no concern for the ukranian population, they're just to be used and dumped, and all the talk of "glory" is bait to get them to sacrifice themselves. From our governments, their mouthpieces throughout the media, and the poppet in Kiev.